Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 2345678 ... LastLast
Results 65 to 80 of 137

Thread: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

  1. #65
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    That sounds more reasonable, actually. Presumably the leaked spec is a non-X part, or maybe a 1500X? (like the R7 has 1800X, 1700X and 1700). That'd essentially make the 6 and 8 core variants 95W processors with low-power variants (1700 and 1500), while the 4 core parts are inherently 65W.


    That is the leak - the top three SKUs were accurate.

  2. #66
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,231
    Thanked
    2,291 times in 1,874 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    Yeah - the if the one listed as as the 1600X is actually a 1500X, the 1600X from your slide just drops in on top of them (at $289, maybe?).

    That'd make the 8 and 6 core range 1800X (95W), 1700X (95W), 1700 (65W), 1600X (95W), 1500X (95W), 1500 (65W). That'd make a lot of sense, I think...

  3. #67
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    Yeah - the if the one listed as as the 1600X is actually a 1500X, the 1600X from your slide just drops in on top of them (at $289, maybe?).

    That'd make the 8 and 6 core range 1800X (95W), 1700X (95W), 1700 (65W), 1600X (95W), 1500X (95W), 1500 (65W). That'd make a lot of sense, I think...
    I am hoping AMD gets to at least Haswell level IPC in gaming on average,because that is going to be a very competitive range there.

    So unless the pound gets weaker,a £200ish 4C/8T Ryzen with 4GHZ XFR boost clockspeeds in a mini-ITX motherboard will be a nice upgrade over my Xeon E3 1230 V2 and I know I have an upgrade path to an 8C/16T CPU and probably a greater chance of having long-term motherboard support for my CPU too.

    Its kind of why I want to move away from Intel - my original motherboard was a higher end H67 one and when it went kaput,Intel had moved to Haswell and I had to get a lower spec B75 based one as the only two mini-ITX motherboards with a reasonable spec available in the UK by that time were B75 based ones.

  4. #68
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    A planet
    Posts
    77
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • DeathByDuke's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte 970A-DS3P AM3+ AMD SB910/950 Chipset
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX-8320 8 Core "Vishera" Core Socket AM3+ CPU
      • Memory:
      • Corsair TWINX 8Gb DDR3-800 (2X 4Gb) CAS6
      • Storage:
      • 1x EVO 840 120Gb, 2x Samsung 1Tb, 1x Seagate 2Tb, 1x Samsung 750Gb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSi AMD Radeon R9 270 2Gb
      • PSU:
      • Thermaltake 680W
      • Case:
      • Antec Sonata 3
      • Operating System:
      • Microsoft Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • DELL U2414H
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 2 Unlimited

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    I am hoping AMD gets to at least Haswell level IPC in gaming on average,because that is going to be a very competitive range there.

    So unless the pound gets weaker,a £200ish 4C/8T Ryzen with 4GHZ XFR boost clockspeeds in a mini-ITX motherboard will be a nice upgrade over my Xeon E3 1230 V2 and I know I have an upgrade path to an 8C/16T CPU and probably a greater chance of having long-term motherboard support for my CPU too.

    Its kind of why I want to move away from Intel - my original motherboard was a higher end H67 one and when it went kaput,Intel had moved to Haswell and I had to get a lower spec B75 based one as the only two mini-ITX motherboards with a reasonable spec available in the UK by that time were B75 based ones.
    I think anyone with a current AMD system will see an enormous jump. Indications are IPC is equal to Skylake in some benchmarks. In fact, in the video posted earlier they stated that they exceeded the 40% IPC goal and got 52%. Can't wait to see how prices settle and Intel's reaction.
    Warcraft gamer on #bloodhoof Avid AMD supporter (we need competition!)

    System: AMD FX 8320 | 8GB DDR3 | 120GB EVO 840 | Radeon R7 270X
    Work: SEO | AdWords | Web Design | Recent Website: MaddForCakes

  5. #69
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by DeathByDuke View Post
    I think anyone with a current AMD system will see an enormous jump. Indications are IPC is equal to Skylake in some benchmarks. In fact, in the video posted earlier they stated that they exceeded the 40% IPC goal and got 52%. Can't wait to see how prices settle and Intel's reaction.
    The CPC leaked of the qualification tested six games with a Fury X. Four of them only scaled to four cores at most and did not really use SMT that well,and the other two tend to need at least 4 decent cores and could use up to 8 threads. The score hinted at close to BW-E level IPC. I am only estimating Haswell level to be more conservative.

  6. #70
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,669
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked
    123 times in 100 posts
    • Percy1983's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte x570 Aorus Pro
      • CPU:
      • AMD 5900x + Cooler Master Nepton 140XL
      • Memory:
      • 64GB (4x16GB ) Corsair Vengence 3200mhz @ 3600mhz CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1tb SP US75 Boot + Fast 4tb SP XS70 + Slow Raid 0 4tb (2tbx2) with 100gb NVME cache
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Vega 56 8GB
      • PSU:
      • 875w Thermaltake Toughpower XT
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 11 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Acer UHD x2
      • Internet:
      • Vodafone

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    Just priced an upgrade.

    ASRock X370 K4
    1700
    32GB ram (2x16gb to leave room for later 64gb upgrade if needed).

    Comes in around £700 and will low my current system out of the water.

    May be worth doing sooner rather than later while my 3570k has some value before the R5s make it worthless.

  7. #71
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,231
    Thanked
    2,291 times in 1,874 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    iirc my last calculation said 92% of Broadwell E IPC for the main cores, but 97% when SMT kicks in (AMD's SMT implementation appears to be very efficient, at least in the workloads we've got leaked benchmarks for).

    That means on current leaked clocks AMD are going to have a narrow overall lead in HEDT, where Intel's chips have lower clockspeeds (and much higher TDPs, incidentally).

    In the consumer space it's a bit less clear cut because Intel's chips clock higher (and of course the popular-with-enthusiast K chips have higher clocks than the non-K chips). For instance, AMD's 4C/8T 3.6GHz - 3.9GHz+ R5 1400X will probably get compared to the i7 7700k, which is clocked at 4.2GHz - 4.5GHz. That's going to give it a > 10% clock speed advantage, as well as a ~ 10% IPC advantage, so it's going to come out handsomely on top. However, that's a £330 chip compared to a £200 AMD chip. The ordinary 7700 clocks at 3.6GHz - 4.2GHz, so it'll be a LOT closer between that and the AMD chip, and if you go to Intel's £200 you're looking at an i5 7500, which clocks at 3.4GHz - 3.8GHz, a couple of hundred Mhz behind the AMD chip (and without the option to overclock, incidentally). That probably won't be enough to put AMD ahead in single threaded tasks, but it will make it very close, and obviously having SMT the AMD chip will easily win any multi-threaded tests.

    Ultimately though, the end result is likely to be that differences between AMD and Intel CPUs are negligible in all but a small number of outlying edge cases.

    The real question for AMD - as ever - is not winning over the enthusiast but getting Ryzen adopted by the big OEMs. The performance looks like it's going to be thereabouts, and the pricing is definitely right, but without significant OEM market penetration it's going to be difficult for AMD to shift massive volumes of processors - after all, the majority of PCs are bought pre-built from big name integrators, not piecemeal for self assembly.

  8. #72
    Senior Member Smudger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    St Albans
    Posts
    3,866
    Thanks
    674
    Thanked
    619 times in 451 posts
    • Smudger's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gbyte GA-970A-UD3P
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX8320 Black Edition
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 2x8G CML16GX3M2A1600C10
      • Storage:
      • 1x240Gb Corsair M500, 2TB TOSHIBA DT01ACA200
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX Radeon HD4890 1GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520
      • Case:
      • Akasa Zen
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Home
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 24"
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 200Mbit

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    I just searched 'Ryzen' in Amazon, top result is an Intel i7 7700k, followed by An AMD8350. The proper Ryzen chips don't appear until about half way down the page. And this is sorted by relevance, apparently. Think someone has been paying Amazon to skew their search results...

  9. #73
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    1,721
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked
    243 times in 223 posts
    • kompukare's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V LX
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-3570K
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 8GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 850 EVo 500GB | Corsair MP510 960GB | 2 x WD 4TB spinners
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sappihre R7 260X 1GB (sic)
      • PSU:
      • Antec 650 Gold TruePower (Seasonic)
      • Case:
      • Aerocool DS 200 (silenced, 53.6 litres)l)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10-64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x ViewSonic 27" 1440p

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    Its kind of why I want to move away from Intel - my original motherboard was a higher end H67 one and when it went kaput,Intel had moved to Haswell and I had to get a lower spec B75 based one as the only two mini-ITX motherboards with a reasonable spec available in the UK by that time were B75 based ones.
    Well, a lot Intel's crazy market segmentation will now come back to bite them.
    Most likely Intel are going win at AVX2 loads too but luckily for AMD AVX2 software support has been very slow since Intel nicely kept using AVX to segment the market (because fusing it off is a lot simpler than having considered how to introduce wait states during design).
    So that's Intel's market segmentation might work against them. Which is nice.
    The new artificial segmented chipset for each CPU has a major inconvenience for the DIY market for years now.


    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    The real question for AMD - as ever - is not winning over the enthusiast but getting Ryzen adopted by the big OEMs. The performance looks like it's going to be thereabouts, and the pricing is definitely right, but without significant OEM market penetration it's going to be difficult for AMD to shift massive volumes of processors - after all, the majority of PCs are bought pre-built from big name integrators, not piecemeal for self assembly.
    Max frequencies do seem a problem for now, but what we've seen so far would be ideal for servers and big server buyers do actually pay very close attention to benchmarks. If Naples takes off, I wonder if any of the very big data centres would be willing to order a semi-custom part with some specialised fixed-function hardware.

    That new hexcore slide Cat found goes on about Q2 so maybe those will be from a re-spin? Don't know what the lead time for the process is, but if some the initial ES's and what they had back in December had an issue the managed to fix for max frequency and they had to re-spin it Q2 for hex and quad makes sense.
    Maybe the initial stepping was okay running the octocore at the speeds we see now (which are actually quite good for a 8C/16T chip), but for quad they need more.

  10. Received thanks from:

    Biscuit (23-02-2017)

  11. #74
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    1,721
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked
    243 times in 223 posts
    • kompukare's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V LX
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-3570K
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 8GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 850 EVo 500GB | Corsair MP510 960GB | 2 x WD 4TB spinners
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sappihre R7 260X 1GB (sic)
      • PSU:
      • Antec 650 Gold TruePower (Seasonic)
      • Case:
      • Aerocool DS 200 (silenced, 53.6 litres)l)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10-64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x ViewSonic 27" 1440p

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by Smudger View Post
    I just searched 'Ryzen' in Amazon, top result is an Intel i7 7700k, followed by An AMD8350. The proper Ryzen chips don't appear until about half way down the page. And this is sorted by relevance, apparently. Think someone has been paying Amazon to skew their search results...
    Nah, Amazon have one the worst search engines where anything which has a comment with the word gets a hit. Almost no filters nor any intelligent search keywords (AFAIK). At one point ebay took away their OR (which you get by using brackets and comma separate list like (1, 2, 3) and so on), but they put it back. Plus they have tons of filters too.
    Crazy to think such a poor website like Amazon is one of the world's biggest retailer.

  12. #75
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    11,193
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked
    1,091 times in 833 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD 2700X (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Patriot Viper 2 @ 3466MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB WD Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post

    It seems the Ryzen 5 1600X is a 3.6GHZ to 4.0GHZ part and not a 3.3GHZ to 3.7GHZ one as leaked before!!
    That's the ticket!

    IMO that's the perfect balance between gaming, productivity and price.

    I'm loving that the totally artificial segregation of consumer and professional Intel has been driving all these years with Z*70 and X*9 is being flattened with AM4. The constant socket changes have also been a real drag.
    If previous AMD chipsets are anything to go by, AM4 should stick around for a while.
    Last edited by Biscuit; 24-02-2017 at 11:24 AM.

  13. #76
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    Think my next upgrade will be a Ryzen system
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  14. #77
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,978
    Thanks
    778
    Thanked
    1,586 times in 1,341 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by kompukare View Post
    Maybe the initial stepping was okay running the octocore at the speeds we see now (which are actually quite good for a 8C/16T chip), but for quad they need more.
    There was rumour of a cache bug that hit when disabling cores, so perhaps things don't scale down well with the current silicon? Just guessing, trying to read between lines that might not even be there

  15. #78
    Orbiting The Hand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lincoln, UK
    Posts
    1,580
    Thanks
    170
    Thanked
    96 times in 73 posts
    • The Hand's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte AB350 Gaming-3
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4 3200mhz (8GBx2)
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Kingston SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Geforce RTX 2060 Super 8GB Dual Series
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX 520 Modular
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Praetorian
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Sony 32 inch HD TV
      • Internet:
      • 20Mbps Fibre

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    Think my next upgrade will be a Ryzen system
    I'm going to wait until Vega has settled in, then maybe get a complete AMD system. The highest level Ryzen chip I'll consider is the Ryzen 7 1700. You never know, there maybe bundle deals with a Ryzen chip, a Vega card, a mobo and some ram etc even if it's just a retailer doing it, although I'm thinking AMD will be considering such an offer too.
    Last edited by The Hand; 24-02-2017 at 04:56 PM. Reason: typo

  16. #79
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    1,721
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked
    243 times in 223 posts
    • kompukare's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V LX
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-3570K
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 8GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 850 EVo 500GB | Corsair MP510 960GB | 2 x WD 4TB spinners
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sappihre R7 260X 1GB (sic)
      • PSU:
      • Antec 650 Gold TruePower (Seasonic)
      • Case:
      • Aerocool DS 200 (silenced, 53.6 litres)l)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10-64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x ViewSonic 27" 1440p

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs

    Timely article over at ComputerBase:
    "6, 8 or 10 core CPUs beat 4 faster cores"
    https://www.computerbase.de/2017-02/...e-spiele-test/
    Nicely done in this review is that you can select only the games you want (click on 'Bearbeiten' and uncheck the ones you don't want).

    Most of the games are fairly recent which helps. With the amount of people doing video recording while playing or doing other things in the background the real world benefit of more cores even for games is quite high.

  17. Received thanks from:

    Phage (24-02-2017),The Hand (24-02-2017)

  18. #80
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD officially announces Ryzen 7 CPUs



    DinoPC just leaked that - its comparing a 65W TDP R7 1700 against a 91W TDP Core i7 7700K.

    GTA V tends to not scale well beyond 4 cores or use SMT well:

    http://www.techspot.com/articles-inf...nch/CPU_01.png
    http://media.gamersnexus.net/images/...u-1080-max.jpg

    Interestingly enough the difference in minimums seems similar to the difference in base clockspeeds of each CPU,ie, 3.0GHZ to 3.7GHZ for the AMD CPU and 4.0GHZ to 4.5GHZ with the Intel CPU.

    I suspect the AMD CPU is throttling due to TDP,but if that is the case the 95W TDP R7 1800X and 95W TDP R5 and R3 CPUs,might actually do better than we think.

    Also,a bit of info from Gibbo over on OcUK about the leak:

    I'd ignore test, 1700, base is 3.0GHz, turbo is 3.7GHz, AMD do this so it qualify as 65W part. If you switch it over to manual mode in a good motherboard like Crosshair you just lock it to run at 4GHz all the time, then the performance is vastly better, even beats 1800X.
    I suspect that hints that even the R7 1800X might be somewhat limited by its TDP.

    Edit!!

    Apparently in CB R15 the chip scored 153 points at 3.4GHZ,which places it close to BW level ST IPC,but SMT scaling seemed better.

  19. Received thanks from:

    The Hand (24-02-2017)

Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 2345678 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •