Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 18

Thread: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    26,062
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,401 times in 524 posts

    Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    Including the 18C/36T Intel Core i9 Extreme Edition processor with teraflop performance.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    I'm special azrael-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Posts
    705
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked
    57 times in 50 posts
    • azrael-'s system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8C-WS
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon E3-1245v2 3.4 GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16 GB ECC DDR3 1333 MHz
      • Storage:
      • 256 GB Samsung 830, 1 TB Samsung 850 EVO, 6 TB WD HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970 TurboOC 4 GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic X-Series 560W
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian 550D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2209WA
      • Internet:
      • VDSL 55/12 Mbit/s

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    I do so love how Intel can't help themselves artificially segmenting their processors.

    While AMD has no problem supporting ECC in their mainstream Ryzen processors Intel fuses off this functionality in their desktop offerings. And of course that must equally be so for their rebranded Xeon processors.

    Heaven forbid that anyone get Xeon features when not paying Xeon prices...

  3. #3
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    69
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • 00oceanic's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabertooth
      • CPU:
      • 4770k H90 Corsair
      • Memory:
      • 16GB DDRIII 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • 7TB (Hitachi + Seagate)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 7990 XFX
      • PSU:
      • 750W
      • Operating System:
      • Linux Mint / Win 8.1
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x 22" Belinea, 1 x 22" Samsung, 5040x1050
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb Virgin + 20Mb BT

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    I can't help but think that none of this would have happened if AMD didn't have a strong product.

  4. #4
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10,249
    Thanks
    1,445
    Thanked
    849 times in 737 posts

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    Apparently they won't be soldering the die to the IHS again, which could be a bit of a nightmare with so many cores able to boost to very high clocks: https://www.overclock3d.net/news/cpu..._be_soldered/1

    Also of note is how they're moving away from an inclusive L3 cache, which is interesting given the similar design choices made by AMD for Ryzen. It seems Intel's isn't quite a victim cache as it still has prefetchers, but I also wonder how the ring-bus is implemented in these HEDT Skylake parts.
    Last edited by watercooled; 30-05-2017 at 12:22 PM.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    It's great that intel actually tries hard now. I'd love to see AMD crush them so they try even harder

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    143
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    For withholding stuff Intel is not getting my money again. My next build will be AMD.

  7. #7
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    912
    Thanks
    103
    Thanked
    44 times in 43 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 PRO
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 2700K
      • Memory:
      • 12GB DDR3-1600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    Hahaha, can you *imagine* the pricing of these if it wasn't for Ryzen ?

    Also, I hear the 18c/36t is going to be $2000. Why not just buy a Xeon.

  8. #8
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10,249
    Thanks
    1,445
    Thanked
    849 times in 737 posts

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    Quote Originally Posted by Tunnah View Post
    Hahaha, can you *imagine* the pricing of these if it wasn't for Ryzen ?
    I wonder if the higher core count parts would have even made it to the HEDT space were it not for Ryzen. I mean the silicon would have existed regardless, just in the form of Xeons though.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tunnah View Post
    Also, I hear the 18c/36t is going to be $2000. Why not just buy a Xeon.
    Maybe the HEDT parts will come with higher clock speeds?

  9. #9
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    912
    Thanks
    103
    Thanked
    44 times in 43 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 PRO
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 2700K
      • Memory:
      • 12GB DDR3-1600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    Quote Originally Posted by watercooled View Post
    I wonder if the higher core count parts would have even made it to the HEDT space were it not for Ryzen. I mean the silicon would have existed regardless, just in the form of Xeons though.

    Not a chance in hell. The Xeon mark-up is a gold mine for them, and it pushes people into that segment where hopefully they get used to the features, and in future when they might not need a Xeon, they still buy one. They would have done the 10c/20t part as a natural step up from the 8c/16t of last gen parts, but they would have stopped there. Intel are all about giving you just a slither more, or one boost more, they have absolutely no reason to do otherwise, until now.

    It's despicable, but understandable, they're out to make money, and had no competition. It won't change my opinion of them, I'm still going to buy Intel parts because they're the best part for my needs (high IPC, my system is strictly a gaming rig, more cores does me no good), but I'm glad they had this kick in the pants. If anything it'll mean cheaper parts going forward and I definitely need to upgrade, not my CPU but the underlying system. DDR3 is showing its age.

    Quote Originally Posted by watercooled View Post
    Maybe the HEDT parts will come with higher clock speeds?
    Aye that'll be how they differentiate em, with the ol' go-faster-stripes policy

  10. #10
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10,249
    Thanks
    1,445
    Thanked
    849 times in 737 posts

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    Quote Originally Posted by Tunnah View Post
    Aye that'll be how they differentiate em, with the ol' go-faster-stripes policy
    That and ECC support. I also wonder if AVX-512 support will be segmented somehow? I've read it will be supported on this platform, but will be it all of them I wonder? Obviously not KBL-X which is a pretty strange product IMO.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    809
    Thanks
    134
    Thanked
    44 times in 41 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97MX Gaming 5
      • CPU:
      • i5 4690K @stock, until I upgrade my graphics
      • Memory:
      • 8GB @2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • Crucial MX500 512GB, 2TB storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte 750ti OC
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12G-550
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    Quote Originally Posted by Tunnah View Post
    It's despicable, but understandable, they're out to make money, and had no competition. It won't change my opinion of them, I'm still going to buy Intel parts because they're the best part for my needs (high IPC, my system is strictly a gaming rig, more cores does me no good), but I'm glad they had this kick in the pants. If anything it'll mean cheaper parts going forward and I definitely need to upgrade, not my CPU but the underlying system. DDR3 is showing its age.
    you're fooling yourself - at any sensible resolution, there's no significant difference between intel and AMD processors (and a very large cost difference).

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Where you are not
    Posts
    124
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts
    • Iota's system
      • Motherboard:
      • GA-P67A-UD5-B3
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 2600K
      • Memory:
      • 2 x BL2KIT25664FN2139
      • Storage:
      • 4 x CTFDDAC064MAG-1G1 (Raid 0)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS Radeon R9 290 DC-2
      • PSU:
      • Corsair Professional Series Gold AX750
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-X500B
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2x Samsung 22" widescreen P2270 2ms DVI HD LCD TFT Ecofit
      • Internet:
      • 40Mbps SKY Fibre

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    Quote Originally Posted by azrael- View Post
    I do so love how Intel can't help themselves artificially segmenting their processors.
    It isn't just ECC though. It's also the speed of the memory supported. Add in the differences in PCI-E lanes available as well and it just starts getting worse the more you look at them. Absolutely fine with them having differences for the cache / core count / speeds, no issues with that. The other parts though make zero sense to me personally, why intentionally make your product offerings WORSE?

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Sunny Rugeley
    Posts
    1,841
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    46 times in 41 posts

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    $999 - dead cheap that
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  14. #14
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    912
    Thanks
    103
    Thanked
    44 times in 43 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 PRO
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 2700K
      • Memory:
      • 12GB DDR3-1600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    $999 - dead cheap that
    You gotta love how they priced it though, they match Ryzen parts equally up to what's available, with all the chips being close in price and then being "only" $100 more, for the 8c/16t parts, but above that they're like "lol no competition let's be Intel!" and jacking the price $400 more for the 10c/20t

  15. #15
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    912
    Thanks
    103
    Thanked
    44 times in 43 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 PRO
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 2700K
      • Memory:
      • 12GB DDR3-1600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    Quote Originally Posted by Xlucine View Post
    you're fooling yourself - at any sensible resolution, there's no significant difference between intel and AMD processors (and a very large cost difference).
    You know before you go throwing insults around maybe check what I was referring to first ? For one, you're showing stock benchmarks, when it is the OC potential I care about; it's not unusual (TO BE LOVED BY ANYONE..BADABADABADUUUUM...sorry couldn't resist) for Intel chips to hit 4.8-5ghz, while AMD will struggle for even a moderate overclock. For 2, pulling out a single benchmark means exactly diddly-bum-squat. Pull a game like Just Cause 3, or Civilization VI, 2 games that are not only incredibly CPU dependant, but ones I've personally benchmarked when moving from a non-K part running at 3.5ghz to a K part at 4.8ghz.

    The most important thing to me is steady performance - in the case of Just Cause 3 I went from drops to 20fps to keeping a stable 60fps in the explosive scenes, and in Civ I cut my loading times by literally 400%, and turn times were reduced by a factor of 3, at least.

  16. #16
    Senior Member watercooled's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    10,249
    Thanks
    1,445
    Thanked
    849 times in 737 posts

    Re: Intel introduces its Core-X Series processors at Computex

    I can't see the X299 motherboards being <£100 like AM4, but it will be interesting to see how they price the threadripper (I really can't take the branding seriously, same for EPYC) motherboards.

    The X299 being Intel and X399 being AMD is just going to confuse people though - maybe AMD were just being petty but I don't think it does them any favours.

    But it's quite funny how they've only just pulled out the i9 branding! I was expecting that way back with Gulftown.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •