Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

    The powerful 16C/32T chip achieved a Cinebench R15 score of 4122cb at this speed.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked
    304 times in 221 posts

    Re: AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

    Holy crap, a >5GHz clock on 16 cores is insane!

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    ATLANTIS
    Posts
    1,207
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    28 times in 26 posts

    Re: AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

    this makes it the fastest processor on earth?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,919
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    183 times in 153 posts

    Re: AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

    My cinebench is 586
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  5. #5
    HEXUS.timelord. Zak33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I'm a Jessie
    Posts
    35,176
    Thanks
    3,121
    Thanked
    3,173 times in 1,922 posts
    • Zak33's system
      • Storage:
      • Kingston HyperX SSD, Hitachi 1Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 1050
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 800w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT01
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTC uber speedy

    Re: AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

    that is very very fast!

    Quote Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
    "The second you aren't paying attention to the tool you're using, it will take your fingers from you. It does not know sympathy." |
    "If you don't gaffer it, it will gaffer you" | "Belt and braces"

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Huntingdon
    Posts
    555
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    28 times in 22 posts
    • Rubarb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI H81m-E33
      • CPU:
      • G3258
      • Memory:
      • 8GB hyper x beast
      • Storage:
      • 120ssd, 2gb hdd
      • Graphics card(s):
      • msi gtx960 4gb
      • PSU:
      • seasonic 450w
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake mozrt tx
      • Operating System:
      • windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • samsung 24'
      • Internet:
      • 100mb

    Re: AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

    Hate claims about overclocks on LN2, it's pointless in a way, only heads up is with enough cold air or water pumps going mental you can get higher than stock clock speed.

    Yes it overclocks but by how much for the average user or even semi-normal enthusiast ... who knows?.

    As far as LN2 shows me . who cares?, you cant run it 24/7 with out staying up all night and topping the levels up and I doubt it would even work for half that time.

  7. #7
    Now with added Ruffus Dog Tattysnuc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    1,373
    Thanks
    283
    Thanked
    207 times in 133 posts
    • Tattysnuc's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus 570X Strix F
      • CPU:
      • 3900X @ Stock
      • Memory:
      • 32Gb Rysen C18 Corsair
      • Storage:
      • 2x 1TB nvme
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2080 ti under Bykski water
      • PSU:
      • eVGA 850W
      • Case:
      • TT Core 5
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Lg 43"
      • Internet:
      • Utility Warehouse

    Re: AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

    It sounds very impressive, but my 8/16 5960X @ 4.25 Ghz (normal, not "suicide" speed run) gives a score of half that chip, around 1700cb. Put that into perspective - the chips a year or so old, been overclocked rock solid and with half the cores, gets half the score of a chip nearing the silicon afterlife, cooled on liquid Nitrogen.

    Quick - yes. Impressive? Not really. I'm sure if you could overclock the top end Xeon chips they'll do those sorts of speeds. This is however, great news for consumers as the price of these Ryzen chips is kicking the ludicrous prices which intel have been charging into touch...
    Join the HEXUS Folding @ home team

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Redditch, United Kingdom
    Posts
    434
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked
    17 times in 13 posts

    Re: AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

    I think the biggest point of this is that the cb score outperforms 2nd best score by a good third... Unlike intel incremental updates which gave at best 10% increase, if that...

  9. #9
    Previously known as Wozza365
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    439
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    18 times in 17 posts
    • Wozza63's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS M5A99X EVO
      • CPU:
      • FX 8150 @4.2GHz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Kingston HyperX 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • Intel 120GB SSD, 4TB Seagate
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX R9 390
      • PSU:
      • Corsair TX850
      • Case:
      • Akasa Venom Toxic
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer XG270HU + Iiyama E2473HDS x2

    Re: AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

    Quote Originally Posted by Tattysnuc View Post
    It sounds very impressive, but my 8/16 5960X @ 4.25 Ghz (normal, not "suicide" speed run) gives a score of half that chip, around 1700cb. Put that into perspective - the chips a year or so old, been overclocked rock solid and with half the cores, gets half the score of a chip nearing the silicon afterlife, cooled on liquid Nitrogen.

    Quick - yes. Impressive? Not really. I'm sure if you could overclock the top end Xeon chips they'll do those sorts of speeds. This is however, great news for consumers as the price of these Ryzen chips is kicking the ludicrous prices which intel have been charging into touch...
    A 5960X isn't really much worse than Intel's current offerings. It's been a slow few years, AMDs results are right where they should be.

  10. #10
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    99
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • meuvoy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z97-G45
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i5 4460
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Kingston 1866Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Adata 128GB SSD + 1,7TB HDD (inTotal)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia Geforce GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • EVGA 750B2
      • Case:
      • Cougar 6GR1 Evolution
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 29" 21:9 Philips Brilliance 298P4QJEB

    Re: AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

    Well, at least we know that AMD have quite the headroom for architecture improvements on the zen cores.

  11. #11
    Pork & Beans Powerup Phage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    6,260
    Thanks
    1,618
    Thanked
    608 times in 518 posts
    • Phage's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Crosshair VIII
      • CPU:
      • 3800x
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb @ 3600Mhz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 960 512Gb + 2Tb Samsung 860
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 1080ti
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet 850w
      • Case:
      • Fractal Define 7
      • Operating System:
      • W10 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Iiyama GB3461WQSU-B1

    Re: AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

    Quote Originally Posted by Tattysnuc View Post
    It sounds very impressive, but my 8/16 5960X @ 4.25 Ghz (normal, not "suicide" speed run) gives a score of half that chip, around 1700cb. Put that into perspective - the chips a year or so old, been overclocked rock solid and with half the cores, gets half the score of a chip nearing the silicon afterlife, cooled on liquid Nitrogen.

    Quick - yes. Impressive? Not really. I'm sure if you could overclock the top end Xeon chips they'll do those sorts of speeds. This is however, great news for consumers as the price of these Ryzen chips is kicking the ludicrous prices which intel have been charging into touch...
    Yep my CB score on Noxavyl's old 1700x is 1712 @ 3.9
    Society's to blame,
    Or possibly Atari.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    100
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    10 times in 9 posts

    Re: AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

    Quote Originally Posted by Tattysnuc View Post
    It sounds very impressive, but my 8/16 5960X @ 4.25 Ghz (normal, not "suicide" speed run) gives a score of half that chip, around 1700cb. Put that into perspective - the chips a year or so old, been overclocked rock solid and with half the cores, gets half the score of a chip nearing the silicon afterlife, cooled on liquid Nitrogen.

    Quick - yes. Impressive? Not really. I'm sure if you could overclock the top end Xeon chips they'll do those sorts of speeds. This is however, great news for consumers as the price of these Ryzen chips is kicking the ludicrous prices which intel have been charging into touch...
    The point you're missing is that if you doubled the number of cores in your chip it wouldn't necessarily run at the same clocks in the same scenario. So essentially your have less cores hitting the same per core score, that doesn't change the fact that they have twice your total score and the world record by the sounds of it.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

    Just so people know, this is literally the higher cinebench score of all time by a single CPU. if you check HWBOT, all the scores above it are 2-4 CPUS.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: AMD Threadripper 1950X clocked to 5.2GHz on LN2

    Quote Originally Posted by Rubarb View Post
    who cares?,

    I care! I want to see what the max a chip can do. Topfuel drag cars are fast as heck too but can't drive on the road, no one brings that up when they are watching them do 0-100MPH in .4secs.

    And when you compare it to the competition we start to under stand a few new things like Intel's skylake-x cpus are clocking to 6GHz on LN2 but still losing by about 50% to TR.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •