Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 17

Thread: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    Alongside results for the Core i5-8400K. Comparisons made to previous gen CPUs.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    26
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    One thing I'm not looking forward to is the pricing on these new Intel CPUs when they hit the market. I would not be surprised if the i7-8700K hit the £400-00 mark upwards.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    1,849
    Thanks
    165
    Thanked
    271 times in 202 posts
    • virtuo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Aorus Master X570
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 9 5950x
      • Memory:
      • 64Gb G.Skill TridentZ Neo 3600 CL16
      • Storage:
      • Sabrent 2TB PCIE4 NVME + NAS upon NAS upon NAS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RTX 3090 FE
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850 80+ Platinum
      • Case:
      • Fractal Meshify 2 Grey
      • Operating System:
      • RedStar 3, Ubuntu, Win 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung CRG90 5140x1440 120hz
      • Internet:
      • PlusNet's best, but still poor, attempt

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    Quote Originally Posted by DirtyDean68 View Post
    One thing I'm not looking forward to is the pricing on these new Intel CPUs when they hit the market. I would not be surprised if the i7-8700K hit the £400-00 mark upwards.
    The non-K 8700 was rumoured at $408 ish, and the unlocked K at $485 ish (not sure if that was retail or bulk/OEM)

    Similar to the 7th gen Kaby Lake pricing to be fair - but actual GBP retail prices I'm sure will change.

  4. #4
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    1,340
    Thanks
    132
    Thanked
    94 times in 80 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus somethingorother
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    So a 10% IPC boost give or take, and the rest of the boost is due to the extra cores. No thanks.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    ATLANTIS
    Posts
    1,207
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    28 times in 26 posts

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    Copy-lake

  6. #6
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    17
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    @Virtuo thinking about buying the same case as you have. Do you have any negatives about using the be quiet! Dark Base Pro 900 (Orange)? Thanks

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    1,849
    Thanks
    165
    Thanked
    271 times in 202 posts
    • virtuo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Aorus Master X570
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 9 5950x
      • Memory:
      • 64Gb G.Skill TridentZ Neo 3600 CL16
      • Storage:
      • Sabrent 2TB PCIE4 NVME + NAS upon NAS upon NAS
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RTX 3090 FE
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850 80+ Platinum
      • Case:
      • Fractal Meshify 2 Grey
      • Operating System:
      • RedStar 3, Ubuntu, Win 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung CRG90 5140x1440 120hz
      • Internet:
      • PlusNet's best, but still poor, attempt

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    Quote Originally Posted by AntaresUK View Post
    @Virtuo thinking about buying the same case as you have. Do you have any negatives about using the be quiet! Dark Base Pro 900 (Orange)? Thanks
    It's massive and heavy, which is only a negative if you want to move it or have a weak desk. The fan controller is also pants, though I believe there's a knack to connecting it up that resolves that - never bothered to look in to it.

    I did a review of it on here (reader reviews) where I moaned that it was a bit fiddly putting together, but it is a great case everything considered.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    278
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    28 times in 19 posts

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    50% more performance from 50% more cores. Not so much of an advance on the 7 series then. But we guessed that already.

  9. #9
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Strand, Cape Town, Western-Cape
    Posts
    81
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    • KN1GHT's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Hero 6 x370 (Wi-Fi)
      • CPU:
      • AMD R7-1700 @ 3.918GHz (1.35v)
      • Memory:
      • 32GB's of 3200MHz Gskill Ripjaws @ 3066MHz
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Samsung 960 EVO, 250GB 5400RPM, 500GB 7200RPM, 1TB 7200RPM, 2TB 7200RPM
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1xPalit Zetstream GTX1080ti @ 2025Core & 5900Mem
      • PSU:
      • Andyson AD-700YYZZZ N Series 700W 80 Plus Titanium Certified Semi-Modular Black Desktop Power Supply
      • Case:
      • Phanteks PH-EC416PSTG_BK Eclipse P400S Silent-Edition Tempered Glass Satin Black Steel
      • Operating System:
      • Dual Boot Windows 7 Pro & Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 1xSamsung 32inch LED TV (1366x768 native) & 1xAcer 23inch (1920x1080) using DSR (3840x2160)
      • Internet:
      • 4mbps uncapped

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    I'm quite happy with my R7-1700 @ 3.9GHz thank you.

    I'v got a good feeling that the AMD R5-1600 will still be the best value chip. That said the hardcore Intel guys will at-least have a mainstream option now. That said with a whole system upgrade it's not gonna be worth it.

  10. #10
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,986
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,588 times in 1,343 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    Quote Originally Posted by Tunnah View Post
    So a 10% IPC boost give or take, and the rest of the boost is due to the extra cores. No thanks.
    AIUI the boost when using a single core has increased, so no not a 10% IPC just more clocks. But we always knew that if AMD released a good CPU then Intel would start raising clocks and heat.

    What will be interesting is whether they have used a quality thermal interface this time, that might show how hard Intel are trying.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    281
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked
    15 times in 11 posts

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    Intel provide more cores, it's significantly faster & probably the same price as the the current chips. Yet it's all whinging.

    If they launched it £50 people would whinge they were trying to put AMD out of business. They can't win here no matter what they do.

    However for people like me looking to buy a PC in a few months this is great news, it's just a shame Vega is so pants as now we have to wait until next year for the 11 series cards.

  12. #12
    RIP Peterb ik9000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,704
    Thanks
    1,840
    Thanked
    1,434 times in 1,057 posts
    • ik9000's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7H55-M/USB3
      • CPU:
      • i7-870, Prolimatech Megahalems, 2x Akasa Apache 120mm
      • Memory:
      • 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance 2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • 2x256GB Samsung 840-Pro, 1TB Seagate 7200.12, 1TB Seagate ES.2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB SuperOverClocked
      • PSU:
      • NZXT Hale 90 750w
      • Case:
      • BitFenix Survivor + Bitfenix spectre LED fans, LG BluRay R/W optical drive
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2414h, U2311h 1920x1080
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb/s Fibre and 4G wifi

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    Quote Originally Posted by Andy14 View Post
    Intel provide more cores, it's significantly faster & probably the same price as the the current chips. Yet it's all whinging.

    If they launched it £50 people would whinge they were trying to put AMD out of business. They can't win here no matter what they do.

    However for people like me looking to buy a PC in a few months this is great news, it's just a shame Vega is so pants as now we have to wait until next year for the 11 series cards.
    and for people like me looking to build a PC we already have great news. It's called threadripper. And is much more economical. But to each their own. As the saying goes, a fool and his money are easily parted. There will always be someone stupid enough to pay the intel premium. That won't be me however.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    281
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked
    15 times in 11 posts

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    Quote Originally Posted by ik9000 View Post
    and for people like me looking to build a PC we already have great news. It's called threadripper. And is much more economical. But to each their own. As the saying goes, a fool and his money are easily parted. There will always be someone stupid enough to pay the intel premium. That won't be me however.
    Threadripper is a great, but very niche product. If you hang around forums like this long enough then you start to think that everyone does large amounts of video editing and streaming (at the same time as playing games) and needs such a CPU.

    However the majority of people don't need Threadripper, & would never utilise even half the cores. The majority of fast processor buyers are gamers and benefit more from high clock speeds than 24 cores. Much to the the AMD fanboys disgust Intel still leads the way in several gaming benchmarks, even before this new generation.

    I don't care less about AMD or Intel, but Intel supplying better products for the same price is a good thing & Threadripper is a niche product compared to i3/i5/i7 & Ryzen mainstream.

  14. #14
    RIP Peterb ik9000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    7,704
    Thanks
    1,840
    Thanked
    1,434 times in 1,057 posts
    • ik9000's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7H55-M/USB3
      • CPU:
      • i7-870, Prolimatech Megahalems, 2x Akasa Apache 120mm
      • Memory:
      • 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance 2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • 2x256GB Samsung 840-Pro, 1TB Seagate 7200.12, 1TB Seagate ES.2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB SuperOverClocked
      • PSU:
      • NZXT Hale 90 750w
      • Case:
      • BitFenix Survivor + Bitfenix spectre LED fans, LG BluRay R/W optical drive
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2414h, U2311h 1920x1080
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb/s Fibre and 4G wifi

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted


  15. #15
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    77
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    i agree with you on this.

    Quote Originally Posted by lumireleon View Post
    Copy-lake

  16. #16
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    17
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Intel Core i7-8700K SiSoft Sandra benchmark results spotted

    Quote Originally Posted by virtuo View Post
    It's massive and heavy, which is only a negative if you want to move it or have a weak desk. The fan controller is also pants, though I believe there's a knack to connecting it up that resolves that - never bothered to look in to it.

    I did a review of it on here (reader reviews) where I moaned that it was a bit fiddly putting together, but it is a great case everything considered.
    thanks for the feedback

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •