Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: AMD Navi GPU reference found in latest Linux driver

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    26,433
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,628 times in 565 posts

    AMD Navi GPU reference found in latest Linux driver

    'GFX10 Super Secret’ string is the smoking gun (AMD Vega was codenamed GFX9).
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Geneva, Switzerland
    Posts
    99
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: AMD Navi GPU reference found in latest Linux driver

    If you look Radeon RX 570 Cf results ( in average, slightly better FPS numbers than GTX 1070) and the same for RX 580 CF/ GTX 1080, one has to wonder what would have happened if AMD simply doubled Polaris CUs and made a chip with that design?

    Once on the chip, it should have better numbers than CF can do, so it would be better than 1070/1080 for sure, even tickling 1080ti. The only downside would be TDP, but then Vega is not so much better in that regard.

    What do you guys think?
    The more you live, less you die. More you play, more you die. Isn't it great.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    168
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked
    29 times in 19 posts
    • chinf's system
      • Motherboard:
      • 1: Asus M5A97 R2.0; 2: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0
      • CPU:
      • 1: AMD FX-8320E, Coolermaster Seidon V120 V2; 2: AMD PhenomII X3 710, Corsair H45
      • Memory:
      • 1: 16GB ECC DDR3L-1600; 2: 16GB ECC DDR3L-1600
      • Storage:
      • 1: Sandisk SSD, 4 WD, 1 Seagate, 1 HGST, 2 Toshiba HDDs; 2: Crucial SSD, 4 Samsung HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1: HIS Radeon HD6850, Corsair H55 & NZXT G10; 2: MSI Radeon RX 480 8GB
      • PSU:
      • 1: be quiet! Straight Power 10 400W; 2: Antec EA500D
      • Case:
      • 1: Antec P182; 2: Antec Sonata
      • Operating System:
      • 1: Ubuntu 15.10 & 16.04; 2: Ubuntu 16.04 & Win10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 24" @1920x1080, Iiyama 18" CRT

    Re: AMD Navi GPU reference found in latest Linux driver

    Shame there's no fact checking going on here - the article cited is either someone being sloppy or disingenuous in search of clicks and ad revenue.

    Here's Phoronix's explanation of the patch which does not even relate to the Linux drivers, and is just a sample text.

  4. Received thanks from:

    Millennium (20-12-2017)

  5. #4
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    10,843
    Thanks
    1,296
    Thanked
    1,012 times in 781 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Z77 Pro4-M
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 3570 (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Crucial DDR3 1866MHz
      • Storage:
      • 240GB Crucial M4, 480GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate SSHD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • XFX 650W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2913WM & Philips E-line 234EL2SB
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: AMD Navi GPU reference found in latest Linux driver

    Quote Originally Posted by darcotech View Post
    If you look Radeon RX 570 Cf results ( in average, slightly better FPS numbers than GTX 1070) and the same for RX 580 CF/ GTX 1080, one has to wonder what would have happened if AMD simply doubled Polaris CUs and made a chip with that design?

    Once on the chip, it should have better numbers than CF can do, so it would be better than 1070/1080 for sure, even tickling 1080ti. The only downside would be TDP, but then Vega is not so much better in that regard.

    What do you guys think?
    Production of a chip that size means that there is less dies per square mm on the wafer, plus it can often result in bad production yields. This results in the chip being a very risky proposition for AMD; if things dont go really well it becomes difficult to actually make any money from.

    Have a look at how things went for Nvidia when they pushed the boat with Fermi....
    Last edited by Biscuit; 19-12-2017 at 04:35 PM.

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,002
    Thanks
    151
    Thanked
    57 times in 52 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97MX Gaming 5
      • CPU:
      • i5 4690K @stock, until I upgrade my graphics
      • Memory:
      • 16GB @2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • Crucial MX500 512GB, 2TB storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 980ti
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12G-550
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • W10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic vx3211-2k-mhd, Dell P2414H
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 150 mb fibre

    Re: AMD Navi GPU reference found in latest Linux driver

    If you can cheaply stitch together GPU dies like epyc you've essentially solved GPU's for a generation or two, since you can go slower&wider until you massively exceed the reticule size (then laugh at the competition trying to make a monolithic chip to compete). Multi-chip cards does fit with the "scalability" term that's been staring us in the face for months, but I'll believe it when I see it

    Quote Originally Posted by darcotech View Post
    If you look Radeon RX 570 Cf results ( in average, slightly better FPS numbers than GTX 1070) and the same for RX 580 CF/ GTX 1080, one has to wonder what would have happened if AMD simply doubled Polaris CUs and made a chip with that design?

    Once on the chip, it should have better numbers than CF can do, so it would be better than 1070/1080 for sure, even tickling 1080ti. The only downside would be TDP, but then Vega is not so much better in that regard.

    What do you guys think?
    They essentially did for V64, only there were a couple of improvements available for the core design (polaris -> vega) and they tried to avoid the cost/power of the required 512-bit memory bus with HBM2. It is better than the 1080, and takes twice as much power than the 570

  7. #6
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    15
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • Dragonstongue's system
      • Motherboard:
      • M5A99X EVO
      • CPU:
      • Phenom II x4 955BE @4.2Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8gb Gskill 1866 9,10,9,28,42 1.5v
      • Storage:
      • Agility 3 60gb, caviar black 640, caviar blue sata 6gb 1tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Radeon 6870 1gb 965 core 1135 memory
      • PSU:
      • HX750
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Raven 03
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64 bit home
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung P2570 and Acer P223W as secondary
      • Internet:
      • 5mb/1mb

    Re: AMD Navi GPU reference found in latest Linux driver

    would not be the first time AMD did exactly that with many gpu from prior generations while keeping power and temperature mostly in check such as 4870x2, 5970, 6990, 7990, Radeon Pro Duo.

    I would imagine the one solid thing (if they could leverage it) the HBM memory, if they took a page from Nvidia book from a GPU many years ago, their GX2 cards, AMD could conceivably use a full length card for the "bottom" and use a shorter length for the "top" of the stack/sandwich so both gpu the memory etc goes to where it is needed and with modern design especially with HBM am sure the cooling solution could be very well done am very sure if they took the time to "tune" the voltages and maybe gave it more clock steps (so it can scale much more easily from the lowest clocks to the highest clocks for performance/power etc) it would be a killer card.

    HBM at least offers what previous memory did not, that is it is situated in a much smaller area instead of spread all over the place, seems like an X2 style card makes absolutely a great deal of sense (not counting cost for them to build or the buyer) I think for sure cooling has to be optimal with the cooling fins/rads not impeding airflow, and the voltage very much have to be "tuned" instead of seemingly making the end user worry about doing that (RX/Vega all benefited a great deal by reducing the base voltage it seemed to maintain higher clocks while keeping power usage down go figure)

    Anyways, will be interesting the new year and into 2019 am sure. and as far as "super secret leak" as many other sites namely the scourge of BS leak site WFCCTECH, unless it comes directly from AMD mouth, there is no point hogging up internet with FUD..not hard to "claim" that something was in Linux drivers when pretty much anyone can photoshop things especially as Linux is very open source with many different versions of it, so IMO, becomes a very unsubstantiated claim, as coming from Linux themselves, they only know of Navi by name, though it really has not had even preliminary driver support from them or AMD as of yet.

    I personally want to see the 2018 refresh for Ryzen (12nm) the "missing" Vega 11 cards (rumored Vega 32/28) as for the Ryzen refresh, again, too many places like the WFCC putzes, a refresh is NOT a new generation or what they are saying as Ryzen 2, Ryzen+ etc, AMD has said all along R2/Pinnacle Ridge is and always was to be 7nm, the "refresh" seemed like a last minute option cause it seems like 12nm was not part of anyone's plans, I suppose TSMC/GF/Samsung all seemed to "figure it out" at the last minute, so they now offer that option..might be no real cost increase (possible slight reduction vs 16nm or 14nm) increased performance/lower voltage.

    Anyways....am done...Merry Christmas to you all, and a Happy New Year when that time comes, stay safe ^.^

  8. Received thanks from:

    afiretruck (20-12-2017)

  9. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    331
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    24 times in 20 posts
    • anselhelm's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B350 Tomahawk Arctic
      • CPU:
      • AMD R7 1700 @ 3.6GHz
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GiB TridentZ 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1x Samsung 850 EVO 1TB SSD, 1x WD Gold 10TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX R9 Fury 4GiB W/ Morpheus II
      • PSU:
      • Corsair CP-9020055-UK RM750
      • Case:
      • Nanoxia Deep Silence One
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell WFP2407
      • Internet:
      • PlusNet FTTC

    Re: AMD Navi GPU reference found in latest Linux driver

    Nope. Debunked:

    https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=AMD-Linux-Drivers-Not-Yet-Navi

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •