Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Intel to take more risks and change to be ‘the new normal’

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Intel to take more risks and change to be ‘the new normal’

    But the Intel CEO insists that central to its future will be the role of data.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    17 times in 17 posts

    Re: Intel to take more risks and change to be ‘the new normal’

    I'll say that Intel have already made plenty of bold moves...yes on people wallets.

  3. #3
    ETR316
    Guest

    Re: Intel to take more risks and change to be ‘the new normal’

    I do not dislike him at all. But to say such an over used 2008 phrase of "the new normal" during a 2017 speech isnt a good sign. That said, ill try my best to think positive and hope for the best. All I want is a Z390 with a 9th gen proc that is using Intels 10nm. I dont think thats asking for too much.

  4. #4
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    13,012
    Thanks
    782
    Thanked
    1,570 times in 1,326 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Intel to take more risks and change to be ‘the new normal’

    Anything that produces data, anything that requires a lot of computing, the vision is, we're there
    So the grand plan is to sell something into all the things? Well that's clever, I wonder why no-one ever worked that out before [/sarcasm]

    And they will manage this with the most expensive silicon foundries and an obsession with x86 instruction sets?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •