Page 1 of 12 123411 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 186

Thread: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    26,428
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,628 times in 565 posts

    Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    But there could be performance impacts of between 5 and 30 per cent depending on task.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    221
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    10 times in 9 posts
    • EvilCycle's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS ROG MAXIMUS IX HERO
      • CPU:
      • Intel I7 7700K (OC to 4.8GHz on Corsair H100i V2)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 @ 3000MHz
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 evo 120GB SSD + 3 x 500GB 72000rpm HDD's
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX1070 AMP! EXTREME
      • PSU:
      • DEEPCOOL DQ 750st
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian Series 750D Airflow Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 380Mb (Fibre Optic)

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    If I receive a serious performance hit due to their blunder then I will be rightly furious and I can see some compensation claims coming their way. Although with that being said, on the flip side, if only Intel performance gets hampered with these fixes, then AMD have just closed the gap for free and the competition is back on!

    Bittersweet.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    569
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked
    47 times in 29 posts
    • Kanoe's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z9PE-D8 WS
      • CPU:
      • 2x Intel Xeon 2670 @ Stock
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance Arctic White 32GB (8 x 4GB) @ Stock
      • Storage:
      • 240GB SanDisk Extreme II System Disk, 960GB SanDisk Ultra Games Drive, 1TB Samsung F3 Backup Drive
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 295X2 OC @ Stock
      • PSU:
      • Superflower 1200W
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Primo v2
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 28" ASUS PB287Q 4k + 24" Dell U2412M
      • Internet:
      • VM @ 350/20

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    So which modern Intel CPU's don't suffer from this then if, as suggested in the article, I wanted to go out and buy a new processor to avoid the flaw?

    As it seems to cover the i7 8700K which is a recent chip the answer may be none!? That's a bit of a shocker.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    492
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked
    39 times in 29 posts

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    I'm am heavily interested in the performance impact of Hypervisor Clusters. This could cripple or poison Intel in this market.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kanoe View Post
    So which modern Intel CPU's don't suffer from this then if, as suggested in the article, I wanted to go out and buy a new processor to avoid the flaw?

    As it seems to cover the i7 8700K which is a recent chip the answer may be none!? That's a bit of a shocker.
    They all do, just newer CPUs have less of a perf impact.
    Last edited by Tabbykatze; 03-01-2018 at 11:56 AM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,046
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    45 times in 39 posts

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    Up to 30 percent will kill some cpu's, my mums atom based tablet is slow enough as it is lol.... maybe this is intel's way to force upgrade old pc's, it's not like we have any other reason to upgrade these days.

    They've seen how well it works for apple by using the software to 'slow down' their older models for the benefit of it's users of course so they're now having a go at it under the guise of a bug fix.

  6. #6
    Senior Member this_is_gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Alnwick, Northumberland
    Posts
    4,818
    Thanks
    173
    Thanked
    246 times in 213 posts
    • this_is_gav's system
      • Motherboard:
      • DFI DK X58-T3eH6
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 920
      • Memory:
      • 12GB Corsair 1333MHz C9
      • Storage:
      • 2xRaptor 150GB (RAID0 300GB), 2.5TB permanent storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia GTX 560 Ti 1GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic X-series
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li A70B
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2408WFP
      • Internet:
      • 8M ADSL24

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    Quote Originally Posted by LSG501 View Post
    Up to 30 percent will kill some cpu's, my mums atom based tablet is slow enough as it is lol.... maybe this is intel's way to force upgrade old pc's, it's not like we have any other reason to upgrade these days.

    They've seen how well it works for apple by using the software to 'slow down' their older models for the benefit of it's users of course so they're now having a go at it under the guise of a bug fix.
    Then they've hardly picked a good time with AMD at it's highest point for well over a decade and generally offering better value for most mid-high end users (the likes who will have the most to lose from this), Ryzen 2 coming and presumably their APU lineup will be getting fleshed out too.

    As advertisements go it would hardly be a great incentive to upgrade your Intel CPU for another Intel CPU.

  7. #7
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    10,843
    Thanks
    1,296
    Thanked
    1,012 times in 781 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Z77 Pro4-M
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 3570 (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Crucial DDR3 1866MHz
      • Storage:
      • 240GB Crucial M4, 480GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate SSHD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • XFX 650W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2913WM & Philips E-line 234EL2SB
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    30% is no joke. As someone who is on Sandybridge/Ivybridge/Haswell for my Workstation and Server/Gaming PC/Laptop this could have pretty significant ramifications for me if it hits workloads I use.

    Goddamn it DDR4 memory manufacturers...

  8. #8
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    18
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    I wouldn't say gaming might be unaffected based on the Phoronix tests, a lot of those games tested are either GPU bound or they are benching in 4k (why on earth 4k when testing CPU performance?).

    And for windows gaming I'd wait to see what Microsoft does when they patch it.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,129
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked
    52 times in 43 posts
    • Percy1983's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Z77 Extreme 4
      • CPU:
      • Intel 3570k (4.5ghz) + Cooler Master Nepton 140XL
      • Memory:
      • 16GB (4x4GB Crucial Tactical DDR3 1866mhz)
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Samsung 850 evo + 2x2TB Seagate 7200.14 in raid 0 with 64gb Crucial M4 Cache + 2TB Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 8Gb RX580 Nitro+
      • PSU:
      • 875w Thermaltake Toughpower XT
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Acer UHD x2 and 55" UHD LG 3D
      • Internet:
      • Talk Talk!

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    My 3570k is already flagged for a Ryzen replacement just waiting for DDR4 prices.

    Hopefully this won't kill my performance too much as I need this to last another year at least.

    Doesn't feel like a good time to be a PC owner but as I use it for productivity I have no other choice.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    MOMBASA
    Posts
    711
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    16 times in 15 posts

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    so consumers need a 30% refund from Intel strictly in Sterling Pounds.

  11. #11
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    7,986
    Thanks
    323
    Thanked
    757 times in 656 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • M5A-97 EVO R2.0
      • CPU:
      • FX-8350
      • Memory:
      • 16GB ECC 1333
      • Storage:
      • 660GB Linux, 500GB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Nitro R9 380 4GB
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 24 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    Quote Originally Posted by lumireleon View Post
    so consumers need a 30% refund from Intel strictly in Sterling Pounds.
    Perhaps they will give you a free Pentium, they might have a few that are hard to sell now

  12. #12
    Now 100% Apple free cheesemp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Near the New forest
    Posts
    2,081
    Thanks
    124
    Thanked
    124 times in 84 posts
    • cheesemp's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z77-D3H
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 3570k @ 4.2
      • Memory:
      • 16gb Crucial Ballastix Elite DDR3 @1866
      • Storage:
      • 64Gb M4 + 240Gb arc100 + 500Gb HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX 480 8Gb Nitro+ OC
      • PSU:
      • Antec 650W Semi modular
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 23" Samsung LED
      • Internet:
      • FTTC ~30Mb

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    Quote Originally Posted by Percy1983 View Post
    My 3570k is already flagged for a Ryzen replacement just waiting for DDR4 prices.

    Hopefully this won't kill my performance too much as I need this to last another year at least.

    Doesn't feel like a good time to be a PC owner but as I use it for productivity I have no other choice.
    I know the feeling. Sadly I probably need to wait longer too - I was considering getting a cheap i7 for my board to keep me going before this news. Might as well not bother now...
    Trust
    [/url]
    Laptop : Lenovo G505s A8-5550m 8Gb 240Gb SSD Radeon HD 8550G + Radeon HD 8570M dual graphics

  13. #13
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    10,843
    Thanks
    1,296
    Thanked
    1,012 times in 781 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock Z77 Pro4-M
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 3570 (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Crucial DDR3 1866MHz
      • Storage:
      • 240GB Crucial M4, 480GB Crucial M500, 2TB Seagate SSHD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • XFX 650W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2913WM & Philips E-line 234EL2SB
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    Quote Originally Posted by cheesemp View Post
    I know the feeling. Sadly I probably need to wait longer too - I was considering getting a cheap i7 for my board to keep me going before this news. Might as well not bother now...
    Yeah I nearly pulled the trigger on a top end IVB Xeon which was going for a decent price, so I also know the feeling.

  14. #14
    Senior Member The Hand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lincoln, UK
    Posts
    1,344
    Thanks
    126
    Thanked
    68 times in 52 posts
    • The Hand's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus K8N-E Deluxe
      • CPU:
      • Athlon 64 3200+ (s754)
      • Memory:
      • 2GB OCZ 2-2-2-5
      • Storage:
      • WD 300GB Maxtor 60GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX 6800GT 256mb
      • PSU:
      • Corsair Modular 520w
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster Praetorian
      • Operating System:
      • Windows XP SP3
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 205BW 20"
      • Internet:
      • 20Mbps Fibre

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    Notice how the news creeps out after Black Friday, Xmas and Boxing day sales, pretty cynical... With Ryzen now a viable alternative on both mobile and desktop, I think I'll stick to AMD.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Lanky123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Oxford
    Posts
    831
    Thanks
    81
    Thanked
    105 times in 79 posts
    • Lanky123's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 4570
      • Memory:
      • 2 x 4GB Vengeance LP
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD + 2TB HDD + 3TB Synology DS216SE
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI Radeon R9 270X HAWK
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone Strider 400W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Sugo SG02B-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 / Ubuntu 16.04
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2212HM 1920x1080
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 50Mbit/s

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    Quote Originally Posted by cheesemp View Post
    I know the feeling. Sadly I probably need to wait longer too - I was considering getting a cheap i7 for my board to keep me going before this news. Might as well not bother now...
    Quote Originally Posted by Biscuit View Post
    Yeah I nearly pulled the trigger on a top end IVB Xeon which was going for a decent price, so I also know the feeling.
    If everybody takes the same approach then the prices of i7 / Xeons from the last few generations could tank pretty hard. If your usage doesn't happen to be hit too badly by the issue then this could end up being a win. Not sure how long it will take for the 2nd hand market to adjust though, probably have to wait for the Zen+ launch at least...
    If you have been affected by this program on nuclear weapons and would like to learn more, please press your red button now.

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Intel processor security flaw requires OS kernel level fix

    Maybe this is the true reason Intel pushed out so many CPU's this year. If this flaw had come out before the release of the latest series then they pretty much would have had to pull and redesign it.

Page 1 of 12 123411 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •