Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 23

Thread: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    Cloud storage data centre company relies upon over 90,000 HDDs.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    London town
    Posts
    427
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    21 times in 16 posts

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    I think the short conclusion is wow, consumer drives are incredibly reliable now.

    From my own server, i've had 15 8TB seagate drives running for over three years without a single failure - that's 16,000 drive days. Maybe I should publish my own stats?

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    161
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    Consumer drives have been reliable for a long time. In 20 years, and dozens of hard drives, I've only ever had 2 failures. Only one of those was a catastrophic failure.

    I've seen more failures at work in the past 12 years with my current company with so-called Enterprise-grade drives than I've ever seen in my personal and professional experience with consumer drives.

    I think the takeaway is that yes, drives are extremely reliable for easily the past 15 years, and WD still isn't sure it knows how to make a reliable hard drive! lol

  4. #4
    Two Places At Once Ozaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Sometimes UK
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    86
    Thanked
    34 times in 33 posts
    • Ozaron's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI X570 Unify
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Patriot Blackout @ 3800 CL16
      • Storage:
      • Toshiba X300 4TB (2), Samsung 850 Evo 500GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire 5700XT, Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic M12-II 620w
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian 500D
      • Operating System:
      • W10 Enterprise 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Gigabyte G27QC
      • Internet:
      • 2.5 MB/s ↓ 0.86 MB/s ↑ ~20ms

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    My last WD Blue 1TB drive failed after barely more than a year (of light use) while having a virus scan run on it. Maxed out at around 260GB stored. Welp.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    227
    Thanks
    70
    Thanked
    34 times in 22 posts

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    I have a small population of 3.5" hard drives of varying ages, including Seagates, Samsungs, HGST and WD, and the worst performers have been the Seagates by a country mile.

    Among my most recent failed drives were two Seagate ST2000DM001s which saw little use and barely lasted a year each before failing with very quick degradation, but my six ancient 160GB IDE Barracudas are still working fine though not used much anymore. I've had a 1TB WD Green slowly fail that was in constant use for several years and lasted well beyond warranty, and I've got several other WDs of varying ages and they're fine. No problems yet with my four 500GB Samsungs even though they're now pretty old.

    Not sure if Seagate will fix their reliability before spinning rust becomes extinct.

  6. #6
    Anthropomorphic Personification shaithis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Last Aerie
    Posts
    10,857
    Thanks
    645
    Thanked
    872 times in 736 posts
    • shaithis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77 WS
      • CPU:
      • i7 3770k @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 32GB HyperX 1866
      • Storage:
      • Lots!
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Fury X
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T (White)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Dell 3007
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb Fibre

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    Quote Originally Posted by chinf View Post
    Not sure if Seagate will fix their reliability before spinning rust becomes extinct.
    I doubt it, the STxxxxDM001 drives have been around for a number of years now and have been shoddy since day 1, can't see that changing now.
    Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
    HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
    HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
    Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
    NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
    Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive

  7. #7
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    13,009
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,568 times in 1,325 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    Quote Originally Posted by gagaga View Post
    I think the short conclusion is wow, consumer drives are incredibly reliable now.

    From my own server, i've had 15 8TB seagate drives running for over three years without a single failure - that's 16,000 drive days. Maybe I should publish my own stats?
    They are supposed to be reliable as long as they are in warranty.

    Quote Originally Posted by DaMoot View Post
    ... with so-called Enterprise-grade drives than I've ever seen in my personal and professional experience with consumer drives.
    Whose enterprise drives are those then?

    I think I have seen failures from every drive manufacturer past and present. Remember Quantum? They were really good, but I still had a consumer one where the head fell off.

  8. #8
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    They are supposed to be reliable as long as they are in warranty.



    Whose enterprise drives are those then?

    I think I have seen failures from every drive manufacturer past and present. Remember Quantum? They were really good, but I still had a consumer one where the head fell off.
    Quantum Fireball!! I trust Seagate the least of all the hard drive brands so far TBH.

  9. #9
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    13,009
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,568 times in 1,325 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    Quantum Fireball!! I trust Seagate the least of all the hard drive brands so far TBH.
    My first ever hard drive was a Seagate SCSI 30MB (not a typo, megabyte). It was a long time ago, but I think it went back under warranty three times. Some people get nothing but joy from Seagate, but my experience with them hasn't improved.

  10. #10
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    My first ever hard drive was a Seagate SCSI 30MB (not a typo, megabyte). It was a long time ago, but I think it went back under warranty three times. Some people get nothing but joy from Seagate, but my experience with them hasn't improved.
    Samsung used to be awesome until in their later years,the reliability just went south. I think the oldest drive that still is probably working is an old 7200RPM IDE WD drive,which ran very hot but kept on going and going.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    London town
    Posts
    427
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    21 times in 16 posts

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by gagaga View Post
    I think the short conclusion is wow, consumer drives are incredibly reliable now.

    From my own server, i've had 15 8TB seagate drives running for over three years without a single failure - that's 16,000 drive days. Maybe I should publish my own stats?
    They are supposed to be reliable as long as they are in warranty.
    Warranty is 12 months (at least on the early ones) so they are way out of it.

    Of maybe 80 drives i've owned over the years i've only ever had 4 fail - an Hitachi 3TB (ironically of the type Backblaze have found great), a WD 2TB Green and two laptop drives (a Samsung that started losing data and an IBM(!) that sat below the thin plastic wrist rest on a laptop and got squashed.

    My server used to live in the loft and got *hot* in summer (the Hitachi died during this time) .. it now lives in a draughty, damp, unheated cellar and gets cold. Had no problems at all in the past 3 years it's been there with the drives spinning up just fine in sub-zero weather.

  12. #12
    don't stock motherhoods
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,298
    Thanks
    807
    Thanked
    125 times in 108 posts
    • Millennium's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI X470 Gaming Plus
      • CPU:
      • AMD 3600x @ 3.85 with Turbo
      • Memory:
      • 4*G-Skill Samsung B 3200 14T 1T
      • Storage:
      • WD850 and OEM961 1TB, 1.5TB SSD SATA, 4TB Storage, Ext.
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 3070 FE HHR NVidia (Mining Over)
      • PSU:
      • ToughPouwer 1kw (thinking of an upgrade to 600w)
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define S
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 101 Home 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • HiSense 55" TV 4k 8bit BT709 18:10
      • Internet:
      • Vodafone 12 / month, high contentions weekends 2, phone backup.

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    Quote Originally Posted by chinf View Post
    I...

    Among my most recent failed drives were two Seagate ST2000DM001s ...
    ...
    Damn, I'm running 2 ST2000DL003 in Raid 0. Playing with fire! They've been ok on and off for a few years though Maybe SMART will alert me?

    Slightly off topic (maybe) but I've recently got a portable (2.5") 4tb WD My Passport drive for backups mainly. I've heard that 2.5 is much less reliable though, is this true? Should I sell it off and get a full size one? Physical space isn't a problem.
    hexus trust : n(baby):n(lover):n(sky)|>P(Name)>>nopes

    Be Careful on the Internet! I ran and tackled a drive by mining attack today. It's not designed to do anything than provide fake texts (say!)

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    London town
    Posts
    427
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    21 times in 16 posts

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    Quote Originally Posted by Millennium View Post
    Damn, I'm running 2 ST2000DL003 in Raid 0. Playing with fire! They've been ok on and off for a few years though Maybe SMART will alert me?

    Slightly off topic (maybe) but I've recently got a portable (2.5") 4tb WD My Passport drive for backups mainly. I've heard that 2.5 is much less reliable though, is this true? Should I sell it off and get a full size one? Physical space isn't a problem.
    You're asking for pain with RAID0 or RAID5/6 in anything that is not dedicated and left permanently powered up ... I'd split asap unless you've got (very) regular tested backups.

    2.5 - these are way more reliable in my experience for external drives. Especially for backup. If you knock a 2.5 drive whilst it's in use, or drop it you've got a very good chance (as in near 100%) chance it'll be okay as they have movement sensors and fast parking as a result of their design for laptops. Knock a working 3.5 drive and you've a good chance a head crash will spoil your day (they are stupidly robust when parked/spun down, however). I advise everyone to stay away from 3.5" USB drives. There's just no need to take the risk given you can get 5TB 2.5" drives on Amazon for £120 now (I paid that for a 30GB drive VAT free in Japan in 2002...).

  14. Received thanks from:

    Millennium (06-02-2018)

  15. #14
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    11,048
    Thanks
    1,016
    Thanked
    944 times in 704 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Strix Z370-G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-8700K
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LPX 3000C15
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 960 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define C Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MG279Q
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps Virgin Cable

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    Quote Originally Posted by gagaga View Post
    You're asking for pain with RAID0 or RAID5/6 in anything that is not dedicated and left permanently powered up ... I'd split asap unless you've got (very) regular tested backups.
    No RAID level, JBOD, or single disk arrangement is a safe replacement for backups. Either it's disposable data, or it should be backed up, preferably a local copy and a remote copy, period.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  16. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Where you are not
    Posts
    1,331
    Thanks
    611
    Thanked
    103 times in 90 posts
    • Iota's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus Hero XI
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i9 9900KF
      • Memory:
      • CMD32GX4M2C3200C16
      • Storage:
      • 1 x 1TB / 3 x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia RTX 3090 Founders Edition
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX1200i
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian 500D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung Odyssey G9
      • Internet:
      • 500Mbps BT FTTH

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    Quote Originally Posted by aidanjt View Post
    No RAID level, JBOD, or single disk arrangement is a safe replacement for backups. Either it's disposable data, or it should be backed up, preferably a local copy and a remote copy, period.
    Raid 10 isn't terrible if you can afford that many drives, although nothing quite beats having physical backups kept on a regular basis for anything important. I must admit, in all of the years I've run Raid 0, I've only once fallen foul of that option (old Maxtor drives). Samsung drives have been fine, and I do still miss my old raptor drives which for their time were brilliant.

    Roll on affordable SSDs at the capacities we now require.

  17. #16
    The late but legendary peterb - Onward and Upward peterb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Looking down & checking on swearing
    Posts
    19,378
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked
    3,403 times in 2,693 posts

    Re: Backblaze shares 2017 HDD reliability stats

    Quote Originally Posted by Iota View Post
    Raid 10 isn't terrible if you can afford that many drives, although nothing quite beats having physical backups kept on a regular basis for anything important. I must admit, in all of the years I've run Raid 0, I've only once fallen foul of that option (old Maxtor drives). Samsung drives have been fine, and I do still miss my old raptor drives which for their time were brilliant.

    Roll on affordable SSDs at the capacities we now require.
    RAID is about resilience and maintaining uptime allowing a failing drive to be swapped out with minimal service interruption (the exception is RAID0 which just doubles the risk of data loss as failure of one drive can affect the data on both). They are not backup substitutes.

    SSD don’t alter that - in fact they increase the need for backup because when they fail, they are (at present) more likely to fail catastrophically rather than giving early warning signs.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

    Been helped or just 'Like' a post? Use the Thanks button!
    My broadband speed - 750 Meganibbles/minute

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •