Read more.Quote:
Appear to showcase an Octa-core Zen+ part with 4.35GHz boost frequency.
Printable View
Read more.Quote:
Appear to showcase an Octa-core Zen+ part with 4.35GHz boost frequency.
1.25v is not bad. My 1600 needs 1.3 for 3.7ghz
The L3 cache of the new processor is slower though. That said, seems like only the super expensive Intel counterparts get ahead in terms of floating point performance.
L3 slower? Those figures say 11.2ns for the old part and 9.4ns for the new one, which is quite a bit faster.Quote:
Originally Posted by dimz
NO!!1!!one! BIGGER IZ ALWAYZ BETTRQuote:
Originally Posted by danceswithunixl3 slower? Those figures say 11.2ns for the old part and 9.4ns for the new one, which is quite a bit faster.Quote:
Originally Posted by dimz
Another set of leaked figures and benchmarks:
https://videocardz.com/75194/amd-ryz...ormance-leaked
It might be fake though.
Do we know if we'll see 2nd gen TR4 based chips soon after?Quote:
Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH
Probably a few months after that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Biscuit
I hope so :DQuote:
Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH
disappointing, it should have hit 4.5 Ghz at least to be able to compete with intel on single thread performance.
More interesting (to me, with Ryzen 1 already) is the GloFo CTO saying that Ryzen 3000s will be in the 5ghz ballpark at 7nm :)
32 threads at 5GHz? Gimme!Quote:
Originally Posted by Millennium