Read more.Quote:
And AMD UK shared the leak on its Facebook page, before removing it due to a 'mistake'.
Printable View
Read more.Quote:
And AMD UK shared the leak on its Facebook page, before removing it due to a 'mistake'.
The NDA says March 15, 2017...
Last sentence:Quote:
Originally Posted by Vic Vinegar
Edit: I'm blindQuote:
...lers. The eagle eyed will note that onn this last slide, above, the source has included an NDA date of 15th March.
*ahem* 2017
You should see the arguments on some other forums about whether this is a deliberate AMD typo to identify the source of a leak, just some shoddy lack of proofreading from AMD accidentally, or indicative of the slides being faked.
Every other date is marked /18, or 2018. The *only* date which isn't is the NDA, and it's mentioned specifically on two slides. I want to say that by this point in the year, nobody still makes the mistake of calling it 2017. Doesn't look very accidental to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by scaryjim
These could eitherQuote:
Originally Posted by OzaronEvery other date is marked /18, or 2018. The *only* date which isn't is the NDA, and it's mentioned specifically on two slides. I want to say that by this point in the year, nobody still makes the mistake of calling it 2017. Doesn't look very accidental to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by scaryjim
1) Been written 2 months ago but only just leaked as audience increased.
2) Copy and paste error - This could just be an updated Ryzen 1 presentation and someone forgot to update the NDA.
If indeed it is a "real" leak, there's a high chance it hasn't been proof-read yet, and is a rough slide being worked on..... thus typos like 2017.
Speaking of typos.
"has the same amount of course" should read "...same number or cores" ?