Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 17

Thread: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    Intel and Nvidia have had PlayReady 3.0 compatible hardware ready for months.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked
    304 times in 221 posts

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    Fantastic! It was very disappointing that it was just Nvidia and Intel for so long but it's a shame it still needs Edge though.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    570
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked
    37 times in 31 posts
    • EvilCycle's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS ROG MAXIMUS IX HERO
      • CPU:
      • Intel I7 7700K (OC to 4.8GHz on Corsair H100i V2)
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 @ 3000MHz
      • Storage:
      • WD Blue SN550 1TB NVMe SSD, Samsung 840 evo 120GB SSD + 2 x 500GB 72000rpm HDD's
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 XTREME
      • PSU:
      • DEEPCOOL DQ 750st
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian Series 750D Airflow Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" 1440p 60hz AOC q2778vqe
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 380Mb (Fibre Optic)

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    I have been looking into getting a 4k monitor for Netflix etc. however being a gamer with 1440p targeted hardware, I don't want to purchase a display to find that dropping the resolution creates a blurry mess when gaming at 1440p/1080p - sorry it is a little off topic, but does anyone have experience of gaming at lower resolutions on a 4k monitor, any suggestions?

  4. #4
    Two Places At Once Ozaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Sometimes UK
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    86
    Thanked
    34 times in 33 posts
    • Ozaron's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI X570 Unify
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Patriot Blackout @ 3800 CL16
      • Storage:
      • Toshiba X300 4TB (2), Samsung 850 Evo 500GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire 5700XT, Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic M12-II 620w
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian 500D
      • Operating System:
      • W10 Enterprise 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Gigabyte G27QC
      • Internet:
      • 2.5 MB/s ↓ 0.86 MB/s ↑ ~20ms

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    So the difference between 720p and 1080p is gigantic, but the difference between 1080p and 1440p is practically nothing? Not everyone wants 4k, damnit. Get your subtle mindgames out of here.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    344
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked
    22 times in 19 posts

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    Quote Originally Posted by EvilCycle View Post
    I have been looking into getting a 4k monitor for Netflix etc. however being a gamer with 1440p targeted hardware, I don't want to purchase a display to find that dropping the resolution creates a blurry mess when gaming at 1440p/1080p - sorry it is a little off topic, but does anyone have experience of gaming at lower resolutions on a 4k monitor, any suggestions?
    I used to have a weaker GPU (GTX780) and a 1440p monitor, and there was a noticeable difference between the games that played perfectly at the native resolution and the ones that forced me down to 1080p. However, the image, while softer, was by no means bad or tiring.

    I now use a 4k GSync display with a GTX1070. Remarkable numbers of games, even highly complex new titles, play great at 4k, but I often use a lower res to allow me to max them out. It never occurs to me to run in 1440p, because 1080p is the obvious solution. 4k is four 1080p displays in a rectangle, which means that every pixel of 1080p graphics is represented perfectly by a square of 4 pixels in the 4k screen. There's none of that softening from trying to display an ill-fitting pixel ratio across the monitor's cell grid.

  6. Received thanks from:

    EvilCycle (02-05-2018)

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    570
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked
    37 times in 31 posts
    • EvilCycle's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS ROG MAXIMUS IX HERO
      • CPU:
      • Intel I7 7700K (OC to 4.8GHz on Corsair H100i V2)
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 @ 3000MHz
      • Storage:
      • WD Blue SN550 1TB NVMe SSD, Samsung 840 evo 120GB SSD + 2 x 500GB 72000rpm HDD's
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 XTREME
      • PSU:
      • DEEPCOOL DQ 750st
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian Series 750D Airflow Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" 1440p 60hz AOC q2778vqe
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 380Mb (Fibre Optic)

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    Thank you for the reply Otherhand, that is some good points to think about when using 1080p on a 4k screen that I hadn't thought of. In the past my experience with a higher resolution monitor than the last one has been more incremental than this so it hasn't had that benefit of fitting within pixel ranges as such.

  8. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    863
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    38 times in 30 posts
    • rob4001's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte z97
      • CPU:
      • Xeon 1231 v3
      • Memory:
      • 16GB
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 256GB SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX 1660 super
      • PSU:
      • Sliverstone 500w SFX-L
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG13 mitx
      • Operating System:
      • windows 10 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Comcast 75MB

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    Quote Originally Posted by Ozaron View Post
    So the difference between 720p and 1080p is gigantic, but the difference between 1080p and 1440p is practically nothing? Not everyone wants 4k, damnit. Get your subtle mindgames out of here.
    I can't tell the difference between 1080p and 4k on my tv if i'm honest. A computer monitor though I do notice probably as its closer to my eyes

  9. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    344
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked
    22 times in 19 posts

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    Quote Originally Posted by rob4001 View Post
    I can't tell the difference between 1080p and 4k on my tv if i'm honest. A computer monitor though I do notice probably as its closer to my eyes
    I find it really beneficial with basic display tasks and normal apps, for the extra screen space, and in games it's most appreciable in games where you spend a lot of time with your eyes trained on the far distance. Rocket League is much better in 4k (although if it was a choice between 4k at 60fps and 1080p at 144fps, I'd go for the better framerate), and of course first-person shooters are much better. You really notice how limited 1080p was when you can see characters and text clearly at a distance.

  10. #9
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    Don't go 4k, go Ultrawide (3440x1440). A bit less taxing than 4k but feels like you are getting all the pixels still.
    Interesting advantage of it and 4k is you don't need so much anti-aliasing. More, smaller pixels means smoother curves. In a lot of games I turn AA off, that plus reducing shadows gives a significant FPS boost.

  11. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    344
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked
    22 times in 19 posts

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    Quote Originally Posted by Fizzl View Post
    Don't go 4k, go Ultrawide (3440x1440). A bit less taxing than 4k but feels like you are getting all the pixels still.
    Interesting advantage of it and 4k is you don't need so much anti-aliasing. More, smaller pixels means smoother curves. In a lot of games I turn AA off, that plus reducing shadows gives a significant FPS boost.
    Probably good advice for strict games-only users, but I needed true 4k for desktop apps primarily. Plus, even if I was in a position to think about 2160p UW, I'd be hesitant about going with that aspect ratio in case games didn't work with it.

    Are you finding that games support 1440p Ultrawide reliably?

  12. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    278
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    27 times in 18 posts

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    Quote Originally Posted by Ozaron View Post
    So the difference between 720p and 1080p is gigantic, but the difference between 1080p and 1440p is practically nothing? Not everyone wants 4k, damnit. Get your subtle mindgames out of here.
    Really depends on the panel. Try before you buy.

  13. #12
    Two Places At Once Ozaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Sometimes UK
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    86
    Thanked
    34 times in 33 posts
    • Ozaron's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI X570 Unify
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Patriot Blackout @ 3800 CL16
      • Storage:
      • Toshiba X300 4TB (2), Samsung 850 Evo 500GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire 5700XT, Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic M12-II 620w
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian 500D
      • Operating System:
      • W10 Enterprise 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Gigabyte G27QC
      • Internet:
      • 2.5 MB/s ↓ 0.86 MB/s ↑ ~20ms

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    Quote Originally Posted by Wrinkly View Post
    Really depends on the panel. Try before you buy.
    In case this is a misunderstanding, I OWN a 1440p panel, I'm referencing the image in the article, which clearly shows 2K as a very small window around 1080p. The image is subtly downplaying how good 2k/1440p is, which is why I claimed there were mindgames.

    Edit: see below, it's just they ignored 1440p entirely to upsell 4K.
    Last edited by Ozaron; 04-05-2018 at 02:47 PM.

  14. #13
    The late but legendary peterb - Onward and Upward peterb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Looking down & checking on swearing
    Posts
    19,378
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked
    3,403 times in 2,693 posts

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    Quote Originally Posted by rob4001 View Post
    I can't tell the difference between 1080p and 4k on my tv if i'm honest. A computer monitor though I do notice probably as its closer to my eyes
    Look at a 4K with HDR and an OLED screen (which gives a very high dynamic range) - Then you will notice the difference! (but you will need to shell out in excess of £1600 - £2000 to do so).
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

    Been helped or just 'Like' a post? Use the Thanks button!
    My broadband speed - 750 Meganibbles/minute

  15. #14
    Senior Member Smudger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    St Albans
    Posts
    3,854
    Thanks
    665
    Thanked
    617 times in 449 posts
    • Smudger's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gbyte GA-970A-UD3P
      • CPU:
      • AMD FX8320 Black Edition
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 2x8G CML16GX3M2A1600C10
      • Storage:
      • 1x240Gb Corsair M500, 2TB TOSHIBA DT01ACA200
      • Graphics card(s):
      • XFX Radeon HD4890 1GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520
      • Case:
      • Akasa Zen
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Home
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 24"
      • Internet:
      • Virgin 200Mbit

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    Quote Originally Posted by peterb View Post
    Look at a 4K with HDR and an OLED screen (which gives a very high dynamic range) - Then you will notice the difference! (but you will need to shell out in excess of £1600 - £2000 to do so).
    Doesn't even need to be OLED. In fact, LED/LCD screens give much more impact with HDR as they can turn the brightness 'up to 11'*

    *Doesn't actually go up to 11.

  16. #15
    Senior Member Xlucine's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,160
    Thanks
    297
    Thanked
    188 times in 147 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus TUF B450M-plus
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB @ 3.2 Gt/s
      • Storage:
      • Crucial P5 1TB (boot), Crucial MX500 1TB, Crucial MX100 512GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 980ti
      • PSU:
      • Fractal Design ION+ 560P
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • W10 pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic vx3211-2k-mhd, Dell P2414H

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    Quote Originally Posted by Ozaron View Post
    In case this is a misunderstanding, I OWN a 1440p panel, I'm referencing the image in the article, which clearly shows 2K as a very small window around 1080p. The image is subtly downplaying how good 2k/ 1440p is, which is why I claimed there were mindgames.
    2K =/= 1440p
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2K_resolution
    It's a hair bigger than 1920x1080, which matches the image netflix gave. So they aren't downplaying 1440p, they're pretending it doesn't exist

  17. #16
    HEXUS.timelord. Zak33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I'm a Jessie
    Posts
    35,172
    Thanks
    3,120
    Thanked
    3,160 times in 1,920 posts
    • Zak33's system
      • Storage:
      • Kingston HyperX SSD, Hitachi 1Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 1050
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 800w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT01
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTC uber speedy

    Re: AMD adds Netflix 4K acceleration in latest driver release

    Quote Originally Posted by Xlucine View Post
    2K =/= 1440p
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2K_resolution
    It's a hair bigger than 1920x1080, which matches the image netflix gave. So they aren't downplaying 1440p, they're pretending it doesn't exist
    I'm surprised at you Xlucine... truly.

    bigger? it's not bigger... this is pixel density not size.
    both 1080 and 1440 could be on the same physical sized screen, and the 1440 would have more pixels squeezed tighter together.



    Moreover, if we DD assume all pixels were the same size and scaled up the images on each...

    1440-1080 = 360 larger

    360/1080*100 = 33.33% increase in pixels

    33% isn't a "hair". I'd take 33% improvement in my car's fuel consumption. I'd take 33% improvement in my frame rates.

    that Netflix image is v missleading

    (and the official 2k is actually 1080x2048 but lets carry on)

    this is closer to accurate
    https://goo.gl/images/AQXXBn


    vs

    Last edited by Zak33; 04-05-2018 at 01:37 PM.

    Quote Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
    "The second you aren't paying attention to the tool you're using, it will take your fingers from you. It does not know sympathy." |
    "If you don't gaffer it, it will gaffer you" | "Belt and braces"

  18. Received thanks from:

    MLyons (04-05-2018),Ozaron (07-05-2018)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •