Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 35

Thread: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    27,491
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,697 times in 589 posts

    AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    Available in Q3.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    9,096
    Thanks
    416
    Thanked
    909 times in 777 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • M5A-97 EVO R2.0
      • CPU:
      • FX-8350
      • Memory:
      • 16GB ECC 1333
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 28 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    If Threadripper socket is only quad channel memory, I wonder if you only get 1 memory channel per die to balance things or if they leave 2 dies without any ram access so that lightly threaded work gets full memory width.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    My happy place
    Posts
    128
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • afiretruck's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X399 Designare Ex
      • CPU:
      • AMD Threadripper 1900X
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 32GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB NVMe RAID 5 + 6TB HDD RAID 10
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX Vega 64 (Linux), GTX 980Ti (Windows VM)
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RMi 850
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Core X71
      • Operating System:
      • Arch Linux (Antergos)

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    If Threadripper socket is only quad channel memory, I wonder if you only get 1 memory channel per die to balance things or if they leave 2 dies without any ram access so that lightly threaded work gets full memory width.
    Is the socket quad-channel only, though? If the DIMM slots are each wired directly to the socket then the CPU could potentially address all 8 as separate channels. Unless I'm misunderstanding how multiple DIMMs per channel are typically wired, that is.

    EDIT! Nevermind, just checked the specs. Definitely quad-channel only.
    Last edited by afiretruck; 06-06-2018 at 07:47 AM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    272
    Thanked
    288 times in 200 posts

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    If Threadripper socket is only quad channel memory, I wonder if you only get 1 memory channel per die to balance things or if they leave 2 dies without any ram access so that lightly threaded work gets full memory width.
    Technically speaking what we think of as the cores (four of them per CCX) don't communicate directly with the ram (or any external I/O), any off CCX data gets sent to the CCM whose job it is to place that data onto the SDF, it then gets taken off the SDF by a UMC and it's the UMC that communicates with the RAM, i guess you could get a bottleneck what with eight CCM's trying to feed four UMC's, I've not done the maths.
    Last edited by Corky34; 06-06-2018 at 08:43 AM.

  5. #5
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    9,096
    Thanks
    416
    Thanked
    909 times in 777 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • M5A-97 EVO R2.0
      • CPU:
      • FX-8350
      • Memory:
      • 16GB ECC 1333
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 28 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    Quote Originally Posted by Corky34 View Post
    Technically speaking what we think of as the cores (four of them per CCX) don't communicate directly with the ram (or any external I/O), any off CCX data gets sent to the CCM whose job it is to place that data onto the SDF, it then gets taken off the SDF by a UMC and it's the UMC that communicates with the RAM, i guess you could get a bottleneck what with eight CCM's trying to feed four UMC's, I've not done the maths.
    The problem is things slow down when you go off chip, so if a core wants memory that is on another die then that request has to go off die to the memory controller on the other die. Going across a carrier in a package is way better than going socket to socket across a PCB, but there will still be a cost despite the best efforts of the ram prefetchers.

    I'm guessing AMD already did the maths, which is why Epyc has 8 ram channels for 4 dies, normal Ryzen has 2 channels for 1 die.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    272
    Thanked
    288 times in 200 posts

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    Now you've got me confused, if a core wants to access data located within the local memory of another core on another CCX it would go via the CCM's, the memory controllers are not part of the dies, as in the four cores that make up a CCX can only talk directly to either one of the other three core (and their associated local memory (L1, 2, 3) or they can talk to that CCX's CCM.

    Because ZEN was designed as a SoC the actual cores are pretty dumb as IF deals with all the communication that happens outside each group of four cores, including the memory controllers (UMC's) and any I/O request, if a core want's memory that's on another die it depends where that other die is, if it's within the same CCX it does it directly, if it's anywhere else a request is made to that CCX's CCM and the CCM places the request on the SDF for either another CCM or a UMC to take it off.

    Basically the cores themselves don't have direct access to the DDR memory controllers (the UMC's) or even another CCX's CCM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    2,446
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    85 times in 69 posts

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    If the price is right I might actually replace my "work" pc which is still on a Xeon X5645 + 12 gigs
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  8. #8
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Strand, Cape Town, Western-Cape
    Posts
    65
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    • KN1GHT's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Hero 6 x370 (Wi-Fi)
      • CPU:
      • AMD R7-1700 @ 3.918GHz (1.35v)
      • Memory:
      • 32GB's of 3200MHz Gskill Ripjaws @ 3066MHz
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Samsung 960 EVO, 250GB 5400RPM, 500GB 7200RPM, 1TB 7200RPM, 2TB 7200RPM
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1xPalit Zetstream GTX1080ti @ 2025Core & 5900Mem
      • PSU:
      • Andyson AD-700YYZZZ N Series 700W 80 Plus Titanium Certified Semi-Modular Black Desktop Power Supply
      • Case:
      • Phanteks PH-EC416PSTG_BK Eclipse P400S Silent-Edition Tempered Glass Satin Black Steel
      • Operating System:
      • Dual Boot Windows 7 Pro & Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 1xSamsung 32inch LED TV (1366x768 native) & 1xAcer 23inch (1920x1080) using DSR (3840x2160)
      • Internet:
      • 4mbps uncapped

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    Interesting times, cant wait to see the 28 core i9 go head to head with the 32core TR2.

    at 5GHz though the 28 core will probably be slightly faster overall, but probably also 3x the price lol.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    My happy place
    Posts
    128
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • afiretruck's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X399 Designare Ex
      • CPU:
      • AMD Threadripper 1900X
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 32GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB NVMe RAID 5 + 6TB HDD RAID 10
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX Vega 64 (Linux), GTX 980Ti (Windows VM)
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RMi 850
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Core X71
      • Operating System:
      • Arch Linux (Antergos)

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    If the price is right I might actually replace my "work" pc which is still on a Xeon X5645 + 12 gigs
    You won't be sorry! I upgraded to a 1900x from a dual Xeon X5670 rig and I've not looked back since!

  10. #10
    Evil Monkey! MrJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,740
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked
    272 times in 209 posts
    • MrJim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V
      • CPU:
      • Intel 3570K 'Ivybridge'
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair Vengence LP
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 830 256GB SSD 1TB Samsung 850 Evo SSD, 2 x 2TB Seagate HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX 1070 Amp 8GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic X-660
      • Case:
      • Silverstone FT-02 Black
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic 27" XG2703-GS
      • Internet:
      • 72mb/s fibre

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    Quote Originally Posted by KN1GHT View Post
    Interesting times, cant wait to see the 28 core i9 go head to head with the 32core TR2.

    at 5GHz though the 28 core will probably be slightly faster overall, but probably also 3x the price lol.
    I hate to think what the power draw will be of 28 cores at 5ghz...or the cooling required!

  11. Received thanks from:

    KN1GHT (07-06-2018)

  12. #11
    C. Sneer is misunderstood CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Moosetopia
    Posts
    28,622
    Thanks
    3,180
    Thanked
    4,415 times in 3,419 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    Quote Originally Posted by MrJim View Post
    I hate to think what the power draw will be of 28 cores at 5ghz...or the cooling required!
    Look at the pictures of the setup Intel used,especially the cooler!!


    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

  13. Received thanks from:

    KN1GHT (07-06-2018)

  14. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    2,446
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    85 times in 69 posts

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    Quote Originally Posted by afiretruck View Post
    You won't be sorry! I upgraded to a 1900x from a dual Xeon X5670 rig and I've not looked back since!
    To be fair it's still plenty fast enough for me at moment... but I do fancy an upgrade. It's been main pc since oohh 2013. LOngest serving one I think! Was originally an i7 920
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  15. #13
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    14,837
    Thanks
    1,169
    Thanked
    2,174 times in 1,800 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • HP Pavilion
      • CPU:
      • A10 4600M
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR3-1600 SODIMM
      • Storage:
      • 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon HD7660G (IGP)
      • PSU:
      • Battery/HP 19v brick
      • Case:
      • HP Pavilion G6
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1366x768 laptop panel

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    Quote Originally Posted by Corky34 View Post
    ... the memory controllers are not part of the dies, as in the four cores that make up a CCX can only talk directly to either one of the other three core (and their associated local memory (L1, 2, 3) or they can talk to that CCX's CCM. ...
    Watch your terminology here. The memory controllers are not part of the CCX, but they are part of the die. Communication from a CCX on a die to the memory controller on the same die happens across a tiny piece of silicon. For that CCX to communicate with a memory controller on a different die on the same package crosses a much greater distance through traces and additional connections. That adds latency, and when you're talking about timespans of less than 100ns, that additional latency is going to be signficant - each nanosecond is a > 1% delay.

  16. Received thanks from:

    Corky34 (06-06-2018),DanceswithUnix (06-06-2018)

  17. #14
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    9,096
    Thanks
    416
    Thanked
    909 times in 777 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • M5A-97 EVO R2.0
      • CPU:
      • FX-8350
      • Memory:
      • 16GB ECC 1333
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 28 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    Watch your terminology here.
    Quite, I think there is some confusion here.

    This is a Ryzen die, a lump of silicon cut from a wafer and the basic building block here:



    Threadripper used to have two of these in a package, Epyc had four in a package and in both cases fully connected. Now it seems that Threadripper will be an Epyc with some memory channels omitted and in some use cases that will matter.

  18. Received thanks from:

    scaryjim (06-06-2018)

  19. #15
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    11,192
    Thanks
    1,392
    Thanked
    1,091 times in 833 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD 2700X (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Patriot Viper 2 @ 3466MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB WD Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/12906...w-x399-refresh

    Apparently 2 of the dies will have their memory channels disabled and will expect to utilise the infinity fabric for memory access. So the "first" 16 cores will retain full bandwidth and the further 16 will have increased latency.
    I tend to agree with the article in that, if the latency is going to be an issue for you, buy Epyc. As long as the scheduler in windows knows how to allocate correctly, I cant imagine there will be too many workloads affected by the additional latency.

  20. Received thanks from:

    KN1GHT (07-06-2018),scaryjim (06-06-2018)

  21. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    2,446
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    85 times in 69 posts

    Re: AMD set to release 32-core Ryzen Threadripper CPU

    Looking at that and the prices mooted I'd probably stick with a 16c32t chip with Zen+ architecture. I'd guess and say that it would give me a huge boost without breaking the piggy bank. Will probably boost to 4ghz as well rather than 3.4 ghz for some lower thread action
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •