LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks1546 with 2x E5-2670 without HT on (16C/16T)
Might try turning HT on and see if it makes a difference later.
1546 with 2x E5-2670 without HT on (16C/16T)
Might try turning HT on and see if it makes a difference later.
it should do! otherwise 4x no of cores and only 2.2x better than my 8yo chip seems rather disappointing no?Originally Posted by Kanoe
1200 with a Ryzen 1600X
991 I74790k oc
i7-3770K@4.8GHZ 841 on air (is still non-delidded so needs to be watercooled to be 24/7 stable)
@4.7 on air 24/7 stable 823
But i can't beat my old i7-2600k@5.0GHZ that chip only lasted about 6 months lol
Last edited by acekorneya; 17-06-2018 at 02:07 AM.
Ryzen 1600 @3.85 - 1287
Re: QOTW: What do you score in Cinebench?
1642
I7 8086K
16 GB Corsair @3000MHz
Ryzen 2700X @ stock = 1822
Asus 980ti gfx
335 Intel i5 750 stock speed
Nah your CPU should be fine up to 4.4ghz. I am running a sandy bridge E here Oc'd with hyperthreading on...so two more cores four more threads with the same arch as you and had a 24/7 OC of 4.2ghz for nearly six years with zero issues. Not to mention some gaming sessions at 4.6ghz. Now this is assuming your cooling is up to snuff (CPU, VRMS, etc), your temps reasonable and your motherboard/PSU are capable./thread. Well played.
i7 2600k @ stock 583
i7 2600k @ 4.1Ghz 702
Could probably go higher, but don't want to push my overclock to more than 4.1 with HT active.
Re-run with HT turned on 2021 (16C/32T)
I would argue that this is the best bang for buck on here though as the CPUs only cost me £150 in total.
Last edited by Kanoe; 17-06-2018 at 09:26 AM.
This one I could join in on. I got a lowly 624
My i5 6500 got 557
Ryzen 5 1600@3.87 ghz got 1263
Ryzen 5 1600x stock with single channel 3000Mhz RAM (looking to upgrade to dual channel in the future) - 1190
1901, Ryzen 7 1800X @ 4.14 GHz
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote