Read more.Quote:
The straight-line speed test was fun, now let's see how you fare when all cores are put to work.
Printable View
Read more.Quote:
The straight-line speed test was fun, now let's see how you fare when all cores are put to work.
With my 1800x I got:
1612 @ stock
1717@ 4ghz
585 Xeon X5645 @stock
3368 TR 1950X @ 4Ghz
1398 stock Ryzen 1700
0.2, it takes me hours to colour all those bits in by hand.
i7-4710MQ:
676 with -80mV undervolt to maintain 3.5GHz. Beats out the 3770 which is nice to see for a laptop only 1 gen ahead :D
My CPU is old so its best not to embarass it! :(
0.4, I colour in using both hands.
Core i5-6300u Surface Pro 4 262
Core i7-6700K Stock: 928
I3-6100 ==> 425
I dunno about that man... I set the bar pretty lowQuote:
Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH
https://i.imgur.com/nj8ia7M.png
i7 2700K @ 4.7Ghz = 823
1752 Ryzen 2700x @ stock with DDR4 3200 CL14
Phenom II X4 810 stock - 256.
Intel i7 7700K @ 5.0GHz
1170.
i7 3930K @4.2ghz DDR3 2400 CL 10 T1
1102
So you have 2 more cores and 4 more threads than my 7700K but only score slightly higher @ 4.2GHz. Interesting.Quote:
Originally Posted by atomicWAR
Yeah between the Windows April Update and a ram change ( quad channel 16 GB DDR3 2400 CL9 T1 to quad channel 32 GB DDR3 2400 CL10 T1) my numbers fell. On the low side I can get 1092 up to 1102 on the high side whereas prior to the april update I got low 1101 to 1112 and before I replaced my ram it would hit as high as 1114. All in all the scores are not bad for a system of this age running in a tropical environment like Hawaii but I do water cool with a 120mmx3 by 80mm thick RAD to cool things off. The temps in my house on a bad day can hit 90+ degrees with AC on but only in the corner where the PC sits do the ambient temps spike high. This is why such a beefy cooling system is required. Under full load it hits 70C with the 4.2ghz clock. I may turn my pump speeds up and check my max OC of 4.6GHZ and see if that helps things. TBCQuote:
Originally Posted by Hoonigan
So I Increased my OC and gave things a whirl.
i7 3930K @ 4.6ghz DDR3 2400 CL10 T1
1201
Hadn't checked my max OC since April update dropped. I do get a nice little 99 point bump. My temps under full load for 4.6GHZ during summer typically get a toasty 85C though the OC is stable...for now. During August running 4.6GHz is impossible due to ambient temps. Winter time my i7 3930K@4.6GHZ runs closer to 80C but i typically run it at 4.2GHZ as this is enough for my gaming/streaming/video editing needs in concert with 2 GTX 1080s in SLI@4K 60FPS max settings or close in most games. Honestly until PCIe 4.0 drops I don't have a lot of need to upgrade though my wife's old i7 970@4ghz is getting a little long in the tooth for her gaming needs but it still achieves max settings @60FPS in most games with 2 GTX 980s @1080P so she can live until PCIe 4.0 drops as well. Likely I will build 2 new machines in short order in 2019/20 depending on 4.0's implementation.
As it stands Zen is barely better in gaming then my current setup. Hopefully Zen 3000 series will fix that (or what ever is PCIe 4.0 compliant)...I hate my last three primary rigs were Intel (Q9650@3.9ghz, i7 920@4ghz, i7 3930K@4.2GHZ) but AMD really dropped the ball with Faildozer. I ran a Phenom 965 as a secondary gaming rig but the AMD FX 60 was the last time AMD ran on my main PC. I missed AMD glory days...glad they made it back to the party.
Preferred the motorbike....
/thread. Well played.Quote:
Originally Posted by DDY
i7 2600k @ stock 583
i7 2600k @ 4.1Ghz 702
Could probably go higher, but don't want to push my overclock to more than 4.1 with HT active.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ik9000
oh I see what you did there. Nice! :clap:Quote:
Originally Posted by Friesiansam
Anyway, proper values:
i7-870
Score on stock @ 2.93GHz = 507
Score OC @ 3.96 GHz = 626
Score OC single thread = 122
578 :C
fx 8320 showing it's age
CPU 4228 with a Intel 7980XE overclocked
1300 with a 2600X @ stock
Wouldn't run on OSX but my Macbook is plenty fast enough for video editing/transcoding etc so performance measurements aren't that important to me.
1484 for my 1700 @ 3.85
1736
1700x @ 3.9 and RAM at 3200
https://imgur.com/viNYEPR.jpg
6700HQ, google the score...
833 on i7 4790k @ stock (4.0Ghz)
1546 with 2x E5-2670 without HT on (16C/16T)
Might try turning HT on and see if it makes a difference later.
it should do! otherwise 4x no of cores and only 2.2x better than my 8yo chip seems rather disappointing no?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kanoe
1200 with a Ryzen 1600X
991 I74790k oc
i7-3770K@4.8GHZ 841 on air (is still non-delidded so needs to be watercooled to be 24/7 stable)
@4.7 on air 24/7 stable 823
But i can't beat my old i7-2600k@5.0GHZ that chip only lasted about 6 months lol
https://preview.ibb.co/mFUzAJ/score.jpg
https://image.ibb.co/jNndny/clock.jpg
Ryzen 1600 @3.85 - 1287
1642
I7 8086K
16 GB Corsair @3000MHz
Ryzen 2700X @ stock = 1822
Asus 980ti gfx
335 Intel i5 750 stock speed
Nah your CPU should be fine up to 4.4ghz. I am running a sandy bridge E here Oc'd with hyperthreading on...so two more cores four more threads with the same arch as you and had a 24/7 OC of 4.2ghz for nearly six years with zero issues. Not to mention some gaming sessions at 4.6ghz. Now this is assuming your cooling is up to snuff (CPU, VRMS, etc), your temps reasonable and your motherboard/PSU are capable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Iota/thread. Well played.Quote:
Originally Posted by DDY
i7 2600k @ stock 583
i7 2600k @ 4.1Ghz 702
Could probably go higher, but don't want to push my overclock to more than 4.1 with HT active.
Re-run with HT turned on 2021 (16C/32T)Quote:
Originally Posted by ik9000
I would argue that this is the best bang for buck on here though as the CPUs only cost me £150 in total.
This one I could join in on. I got a lowly 624
My i5 6500 got 557
Ryzen 5 1600@3.87 ghz got 1263
Ryzen 5 1600x stock with single channel 3000Mhz RAM (looking to upgrade to dual channel in the future) - 1190
1901, Ryzen 7 1800X @ 4.14 GHz
614 - Ryzen 2500u
Must admit I'm pretty chuffed to see my 2.0GHz 4C8T mobile chip beating a 3.40GHz 4C8T Core i7-2600K...
R7-1700@3.9GHz=1668
32GB g.skill 3000MHz RAM
Asus Crosair Hero 6 x370
With six years of advancements, you would hope it would. Loving seeing these Ryzen scores, considering it's what I'll likely be upgrading to regardless of what Intel release in the very near future.Quote:
Originally Posted by bae85
Just benched the laptop:
https://i.imgur.com/p3v33Wv.jpg
*Updated score* 1576cb @ 3.7GHz. I O/C'd higher at 3.95GHz and system crashed running the benchmark. I also tried at 3.85 and that crashes also. Anything over 3.7 crashes CB or the OS. The system is stable running games at 3.95GHz. Single core: 143 cb @ 3.7GHz. Memory is: DDR4 2133 running @ 3000MHz G.Skill Trident Z. It's ram for Intel systems though it runs fine for AMD.
1500 cb with a Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.6 GHz
1070 on the OpenGL test got: 94.66 fps
3146 TR 1950x @stock
I hope the complaining about pifast last week wasn't taken as AMD fanboyism just because the benchmark favours Intel platforms?Quote:
but it was clear that AMD users weren't having as much fun as the others.
1508 7700k @ 6722mhz
3626 7920x @ 5501mhz
2130
7820X at 4.8 Ghz
80°C at 1.85v
https://imgur.com/a/gQYwLQ1
Core I7 4790 @4.00 score 910
Open GL 129.2 fps
I'm more thinking along the lines about how AMD upped their game so much and how good it is to see compared to a top performing desktop chip at the time (that is still fast and good enough to still be used today - which speaks volumes). Before Ryzen did a cheap mainstream low power laptop chip match a top performing desktop chip from a few years before it? no they didn't. My Ryzen even has inbuilt graphics that wipe the floor with anything integrated that Intel can come up with too, I can play most games at HD at a very respectable frame rate! As a package it's tremendous.Quote:
Originally Posted by Iota
Ryzen 7 1700 @ 4Ghz 1810cb
This may be an issue for intel people only, but when trying to extract the files from the zip, it gives me a "path to long error for 2 of the AMD files.
On my i7 5820K at 4.5Ghz I get 1322 (no OS optimization, just shut other open programs), just goes to show how much quicker the newer CPU's are. Still my system is silent at 4.5Ghz :-)
CPU: I7-6700K
Cores x GHHz: 4cores, 8threads @4.01
OS: win 10 64 pro (test read as win 8 pro)
GFX card: GTX 960
Scores:
OpenGL-132.47 fps
CPU-853 cb
I7-5960x @ 4.4 - - - - 1765
Ryzen 7 2700x stock -- 1770
i9 7980XE @ 2.6 Ghz - 3265cb
i9 7980XE @ 4.2 GHz - 4071cbQuote:
Originally Posted by stupidboy123
i7-5820K (6C and 12T) @4.5GHz (supposedly) - 1317cb with 173cb single core
980Ti stock OpenGL - 180.68fps
Pretty attrocious, really. I thought we'd overclocked everything better than that.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 1011. Stock.
That isn't an Intel thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by DRAGONFIRE_Sr
What are you using to extract the zip?
Are you using NTFS on the drive you are storing the files on?
Which Windows version are you using?
Have you tried deleting the zip and re-downloading it?
1950X stock, 3466MHz The Stilt setup, 3030 171, link to screenie.
2700X @ 4.125GHz PState 0 1898
2700X @ 4.1GHz PState 0 1887
2700X @ 4.075GHz PState 0 1876
1800X @ 4.0GHz PState 0 1803
1700 @ 3.8GHz PState 0 1703
1223 Ryzen 1600x @ 3.6
Dell XPS 15 9570. i9-8950HK @ stock
1078
Scored 681 on an i5 8250u
https://i.imgur.com/k8BmPtQ.png
With some help from Throttlestop...