Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 32

Thread: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    28,331
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,845 times in 628 posts

    32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    And in a CPU-Z screenshot the CPU is described as the 'Ryzen Threadripper 2990X'.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    bored of Vienetta now
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    5,025
    Thanks
    1,178
    Thanked
    743 times in 565 posts
    • ik9000's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P7H55-M/USB3
      • CPU:
      • i7-870, Prolimatech Megahalems, 2x Akasa Apache 120mm
      • Memory:
      • 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance 2133 11-11-11-27
      • Storage:
      • 2x256GB Samsung 840-Pro, 1TB Seagate 7200.12, 1TB Seagate ES.2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB SuperOverClocked
      • PSU:
      • NZXT Hale 90 750w
      • Case:
      • BitFenix Survivor + Bitfenix spectre LED fans, LG BluRay R/W optical drive
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2414h, U2311h 1920x1080
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb/s Fibre and 4G wifi

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Difference this would make to my non-linear analysis and FEM work-flow. High. Chances of work upgrading my i5-2500 to anything with more than 4 cores? Low. Sigh...

  3. #3
    HEXUS.timelord. Zak33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I'm a Jessie
    Posts
    34,074
    Thanks
    2,546
    Thanked
    2,621 times in 1,654 posts
    • Zak33's system
      • Storage:
      • Kingston HyperX SSD, Hitachi 1Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 1060
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 800w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT01
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTC uber speedy

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Quote Originally Posted by ik9000 View Post
    Difference this would make to my non-linear analysis and FEM work-flow. High. Chances of work upgrading my i5-2500 to anything with more than 4 cores? Low. Sigh...
    have you priced a Ryzen 7 1700? or 2700 maybe? The 8 core, 16 thread beast might be in reach.
    .
    Quote Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
    "The second you aren't paying attention to the tool you're using, it will take your fingers from you. It does not know sympathy." |
    "If you don't gaffer it, it will gaffer you" | "Belt and braces"

  4. #4
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    14,995
    Thanks
    1,187
    Thanked
    2,230 times in 1,835 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 1x 8GB DDR4 2400
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Quote Originally Posted by ik9000 View Post
    Difference this would make to my non-linear analysis and FEM work-flow. High....
    Can you "borrow" a high core count machine to run a workload on and demostrate to management how much of your time they could be saving by investing in faster tech? Sounds to me like there's a business case to be made there...

    At first sight 32 cores @ a 3.4GHz base clock looked very impressive, but then I realised that a 250W TDP is 62.5W per die. Once you take into account the fact that 2 dies have their IMCs disabled and threadripper is meant to get cherry picked silicon, it's actually a bit dull that they're running at 65W Ryzen clocks....

  5. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    66
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Quote Originally Posted by ik9000 View Post
    Difference this would make to my non-linear analysis and FEM work-flow. High. Chances of work upgrading my i5-2500 to anything with more than 4 cores? Low. Sigh...
    You gotta make the fiscle argument, its not that it will make your job 16 time easier, it will make you 16 times cheeper! And still the manager will think: hey it comes out of my budget and my bonus is based on being under... Damn suits!

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    My happy place
    Posts
    171
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked
    13 times in 11 posts
    • afiretruck's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X399 Designare Ex
      • CPU:
      • AMD Threadripper 1900X
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 32GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1x Intel 900p 280GB (root, swap, scratch) + 3x 250GB NVMe SSDs in RAID 5 (home)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX Vega 64
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RMi 850
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Meshify C
      • Operating System:
      • Linux Mint 19
      • Monitor(s):
      • 4k something-or-other.

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    At first sight 32 cores @ a 3.4GHz base clock looked very impressive, but then I realised that a 250W TDP is 62.5W per die. Once you take into account the fact that 2 dies have their IMCs disabled and threadripper is meant to get cherry picked silicon, it's actually a bit dull that they're running at 65W Ryzen clocks....
    Maybe these ones are from the same batch as the 65W Ryzen chips, instead of being the cream-of-the-crop the 2-chip Threadrippers are made from?

  7. #7
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    14,995
    Thanks
    1,187
    Thanked
    2,230 times in 1,835 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 1x 8GB DDR4 2400
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Quote Originally Posted by afiretruck View Post
    Maybe these ones are from the same batch as the 65W Ryzen chips, instead of being the cream-of-the-crop the 2-chip Threadrippers are made from?
    Hmmm, I can't see them wanting to damage the premium image they've been trying to cultivate for Threadripper, and tbf the 65W 8 core Ryzen (2700) bases at 3.2GHz. The really interesting thing will be when the proper reviews come in and we start to see what they can maintain under PB2 - that 3.2GHz R7 2700 actually maintained > 3.4GHz under load, so if the Threadrippers have a 3.4GHz base but can actually maintain 3.6GHz+....

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    2,561
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    96 times in 79 posts

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Tbf they are cinebenching at 4ghz which appears to be pretty stable to run the benchies. So hopefully although they might be running at 65w per die they are also able to hit better clockspeeds
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    My happy place
    Posts
    171
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked
    13 times in 11 posts
    • afiretruck's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X399 Designare Ex
      • CPU:
      • AMD Threadripper 1900X
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 32GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1x Intel 900p 280GB (root, swap, scratch) + 3x 250GB NVMe SSDs in RAID 5 (home)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX Vega 64
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RMi 850
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Meshify C
      • Operating System:
      • Linux Mint 19
      • Monitor(s):
      • 4k something-or-other.

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    Hmmm, I can't see them wanting to damage the premium image they've been trying to cultivate for Threadripper, and tbf the 65W 8 core Ryzen (2700) bases at 3.2GHz. The really interesting thing will be when the proper reviews come in and we start to see what they can maintain under PB2 - that 3.2GHz R7 2700 actually maintained > 3.4GHz under load, so if the Threadrippers have a 3.4GHz base but can actually maintain 3.6GHz+....
    Maintaining 3.6GHz would be really impressive under full load! Thinking about it, I imagine they'd want to keep the cream-of-the-crop chips to allow maintaining higher boosts (4 GHz+?) under lower loads.

  10. #10
    Bows out! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Hopefully somewhere less backstabby
    Posts
    28,789
    Thanks
    3,203
    Thanked
    4,456 times in 3,442 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Quote Originally Posted by ik9000 View Post
    Difference this would make to my non-linear analysis and FEM work-flow. High. Chances of work upgrading my i5-2500 to anything with more than 4 cores? Low. Sigh...
    The Ryzen 5 1600 is under £150 now.


    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

  11. #11
    Ryzen Master race outwar6010's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Londinium
    Posts
    1,942
    Thanks
    398
    Thanked
    228 times in 150 posts
    • outwar6010's system
      • Motherboard:
      • asus Crosshair x370
      • CPU:
      • 1800x @ 4ghz
      • Memory:
      • Team Group Dark Pro Edition 16GB (2X8GB) DDR4 PC4-25600C14 3200MHZ
      • Storage:
      • More than most
      • Graphics card(s):
      • evga 1080ti
      • PSU:
      • corsair ax 760
      • Case:
      • Corsair 900d
      • Operating System:
      • windows 10 pro 64 bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • hp omen 32
      • Internet:
      • Bt infinite

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Imagine if they had an ac unit strapped to that thing
    "A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in."


  12. Received thanks from:

    Bagnaj97 (20-06-2018),CAT-THE-FIFTH (20-06-2018),ik9000 (20-06-2018),MLyons (20-06-2018),Mr_Jon (20-06-2018)

  13. #12
    Senior Member Xlucine's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,385
    Thanks
    206
    Thanked
    102 times in 87 posts
    • Xlucine's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus TUF B450M-plus
      • CPU:
      • R3 1200 @ 3.5 GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB @ 2.6 GHz
      • Storage:
      • Crucial MX500 1TB, Crucial MX100 512GB, 2TB hard disk
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 980ti
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic S12G-550
      • Case:
      • Silverstone TJ08-E
      • Operating System:
      • W10 pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic vx3211-2k-mhd, Dell P2414H
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet 70 Mb/s

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Assuming perfect scaling, 4x the 2700 cinebench score is 6252. That's the same ballpark as the numbers in the article, so it can't be running an all core boost too far from the 2700 figure.

  14. #13
    Long member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,133
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked
    202 times in 150 posts
    • philehidiot's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Father's bored
      • CPU:
      • Cockroach brain V0.1
      • Memory:
      • Innebriated, unwritten
      • Storage:
      • Big Yellow Self Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Semi chewed Crayola Mega Pack
      • PSU:
      • 20KW single phase direct grid supply
      • Case:
      • Closed, Open, Cold
      • Operating System:
      • Cockroach
      • Monitor(s):
      • The mental health nurses
      • Internet:
      • Please.

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Y'know what's really funny though.... Anandtech just did an article showing how that for 4K gaming, AMD's Ryzen 3 is pretty much as good as the top tier CPUs. So save a few hundred quid and throw it at the GPU was their advice.

    But part of me really wants a threadripper.

  15. #14
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    74
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    4 times in 3 posts

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Does it need a $5000 dollar cooling solution like the recent Intel did? If i recall correctly the Intel rig scored 7400-ish at 5ghz.

  16. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    2,561
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    96 times in 79 posts

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Quote Originally Posted by ohmaheid View Post
    Does it need a $5000 dollar cooling solution like the recent Intel did? If i recall correctly the Intel rig scored 7400-ish at 5ghz.
    It's 250 watts and a bigger socket. That's pretty easy to do and with decent air cooling I would imagine not a problem
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  17. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,159
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked
    161 times in 110 posts

    Re: 32C/64T AMD Ryzen Threadripper Cinebench scores surface

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    It's 250 watts and a bigger socket. That's pretty easy to do and with decent air cooling I would imagine not a problem

    Coolermaster have already created (and has been shown) an air cooler designed for Threadripper 2 but I doubt it would be able to sustain an all core clock of 4+ GHz.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •