Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 19 of 19

Thread: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

  1. #17
    ETR316
    Guest

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    I know its the cool thing right now to hate on Intel and fan boy AMD like they are the greatest of all time. i'll just say, MEH, i'm not really that impressed by either. Ill wait it out another year, and when Intel comes out with 10th gen ill compare what both companies have to offer then, and hopefully both will be using DDR5 by then.

  2. #18
    Be wary of Scan Dashers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    1,079
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked
    137 times in 107 posts
    • Dashers's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-5930K
      • Memory:
      • 48GB Corsair DDR4 3000 Quad-channel
      • Storage:
      • Intel 750 PCIe SSD; RAID-0 x2 Samsung 840 EVO; RAID-0 x2 WD Black; RAID-0 x2 Crucial MX500
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
      • PSU:
      • CoolerMaster Silent Pro M2 720W
      • Case:
      • Corsair 500R
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Philips 40" 4K AMVA + 23.8" AOC 144Hz IPS
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTTC

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    Quote Originally Posted by Tabbykatze View Post
    Curious as to what you use all your PCIe lanes for? 10Gig, PCIe SSD or a RAID card?
    x32 SLI GFX (though these could run at x8 each without impact)
    x4 10GBe Ethernet
    x4 NVMe PCIe
    x1 Sound card

    At this point, I have lanes to spare. I have four x16 slots, which are full with the bigger things above, and three x1 slots. One has a sound card in, the other two are obscured by the GFX coolers.

    I'd like to jam another PCIe SSD in there, but I simply don't have the room, I'd have to chuck the 10G network card at that point.

    The x1 slots are done over the PCH DMI interface along with SATA ports etc. My M.2 slot is fairly useless running at x2 link speed.

    I see my next computer using more PCIe storage, not less. And it's always nice to have a bit of capacity for upgrades. My x58 board used a slot up for USB 3.0 support. This board doesn't do 3.1, if I needed that, that'd use up some lanes.

  3. #19
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,042
    Thanks
    3,909
    Thanked
    5,213 times in 4,005 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    Looks like Videocardz updated the previous roadmap they leaked.





    So like with CFL it looks like this launch has been brought forward.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •