Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 19

Thread: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    Its 10,719 CPU-only score beats the Core i7-8700K (7,918) and Ryzen 7 2700X (9,147).
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked
    304 times in 221 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    Interesting results, I would really like to see the 9900k and 2700X do a head to head at 4GHz to really show how the two perform.

    Nice to see that the 2700X appears to reasonably within 10% of the 9900K so will anticipate real world clocks and performances

  3. #3
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    31,841
    Thanks
    3,839
    Thanked
    5,132 times in 3,958 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    The CPU might be an ES as it is running at 3.1GHZ instead of the purported 3.6GHZ though.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked
    304 times in 221 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    The CPU might be an ES as it is running at 3.1GHZ instead of the purported 3.6GHZ though.
    That's true, there have been some rumours about that in these reports

  5. #5
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    31,841
    Thanks
    3,839
    Thanked
    5,132 times in 3,958 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    Quote Originally Posted by Tabbykatze View Post
    That's true, there have been some rumours about that in these reports
    Although TBH I seriously doubt the 8C/16T version is going to be faster in gaming than the 8C/8T version and whether the 6C/12T CFL CPUs will be much slower than the 8C/8T CPUs.

    Its a bit like the 6C/12T Ryzens agains the 8C/16T ones. Most of the differences seem to be down to clockspeed.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Where you are not
    Posts
    1,267
    Thanks
    564
    Thanked
    92 times in 81 posts
    • Iota's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus Hero XI
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i9 9900KF
      • Memory:
      • CMD32GX4M2C3200C16
      • Storage:
      • 1 x 250GB / 1 x 1TB / 1 x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia RTX 3090 Founders Edition
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX1200i
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian 500D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung Odyssey G9
      • Internet:
      • 40Mbps SKY Fibre

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    The CPU might be an ES as it is running at 3.1GHZ instead of the purported 3.6GHZ though.
    Probably right.

    Interesting to see the CPU score and comparison though, considering it can run ~16% faster than the 2700X it achieves a score ~17% higher. Really goes to show the improvements AMD have made in terms of IPC and the stagnation of Intel trying to push as much out of the old architecture. Pinch of salt obviously, considering it is likely an engineering sample being compared.

    Dread to think how much Intel is going to try to charge for this though, I imagine it'll be a bit higher than ~17% difference

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    ATLANTIS
    Posts
    1,207
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    28 times in 26 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    is this chip under mesh or ring bus interconnect? ...are all i9 utilizing mesh fabric?

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    So people are just assuming this is a i9 9900K? I see no mention of it in any screenshot.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Where you are not
    Posts
    1,267
    Thanks
    564
    Thanked
    92 times in 81 posts
    • Iota's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus Hero XI
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i9 9900KF
      • Memory:
      • CMD32GX4M2C3200C16
      • Storage:
      • 1 x 250GB / 1 x 1TB / 1 x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia RTX 3090 Founders Edition
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX1200i
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian 500D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung Odyssey G9
      • Internet:
      • 40Mbps SKY Fibre

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    Quote Originally Posted by jdsim9173 View Post
    So people are just assuming this is a i9 9900K? I see no mention of it in any screenshot.
    Well if the i7 isn't going to have HT, that leaves.... the i9 9900K as the supposed suspect here. As per the original article we've only got
    Thai overclocker Tum Apisak shared the system configuration via his Twitter feed
    information to go on. Obviously any potential leak of information comes with a pinch of salt, as always.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked
    304 times in 221 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    Quote Originally Posted by jdsim9173 View Post
    So people are just assuming this is a i9 9900K? I see no mention of it in any screenshot.
    The bit where it says 8 cores and 16 logical threads and there are new Intel processors coming out of which one is an 8C16T i9-9900k makes it a pretty compelling argument that this is for the 9900k...

  11. #11
    Yay a custom user title! =assassin='s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    896
    Thanks
    89
    Thanked
    57 times in 39 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    Although TBH I seriously doubt the 8C/16T version is going to be faster in gaming than the 8C/8T version and whether the 6C/12T CFL CPUs will be much slower than the 8C/8T CPUs.

    Its a bit like the 6C/12T Ryzens agains the 8C/16T ones. Most of the differences seem to be down to clockspeed.
    The 8C/8T version sounds pretty good to me, seeing how alot of games tend to run better on proper cores. Should run cooler than the hyper-threaded versions too I would assume?

  12. #12
    King of the Juice Platinum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Chesterfield
    Posts
    3,769
    Thanks
    713
    Thanked
    89 times in 74 posts
    • Platinum's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X99 Deluxue
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 5930k @ 4GHz
      • Memory:
      • 32gb Crucial 2400MHz
      • Storage:
      • 256gb Samsung SP941, 1tb MX500 Crucial SSD, 240gb Intel 730 SSD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 Fury OC
      • PSU:
      • 750 Watt Corsair HX
      • Case:
      • Corsiar 750D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2408WFP
      • Internet:
      • 18Mb

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    Ring, this isn't a HEDT chip.
    Salazaar : <Touching wood as I write this...>


  13. #13
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    31,841
    Thanks
    3,839
    Thanked
    5,132 times in 3,958 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    Quote Originally Posted by Iota View Post
    Probably right.

    Interesting to see the CPU score and comparison though, considering it can run ~16% faster than the 2700X it achieves a score ~17% higher. Really goes to show the improvements AMD have made in terms of IPC and the stagnation of Intel trying to push as much out of the old architecture. Pinch of salt obviously, considering it is likely an engineering sample being compared.

    Dread to think how much Intel is going to try to charge for this though, I imagine it'll be a bit higher than ~17% difference
    Probably it will be overpriced.

    Quote Originally Posted by =assassin= View Post
    The 8C/8T version sounds pretty good to me, seeing how alot of games tend to run better on proper cores. Should run cooler than the hyper-threaded versions too I would assume?
    I assume so.

  14. #14
    Be wary of Scan Dashers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    1,079
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked
    137 times in 107 posts
    • Dashers's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-5930K
      • Memory:
      • 48GB Corsair DDR4 3000 Quad-channel
      • Storage:
      • Intel 750 PCIe SSD; RAID-0 x2 Samsung 840 EVO; RAID-0 x2 WD Black; RAID-0 x2 Crucial MX500
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
      • PSU:
      • CoolerMaster Silent Pro M2 720W
      • Case:
      • Corsair 500R
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Philips 40" 4K AMVA + 23.8" AOC 144Hz IPS
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTTC

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    Doesn't matter, not going to be buying a CPU with 16 PCIe lanes. Threadripper is looking like the smart money, although I'm not liking the sound of having to switch between game mode etc.

    I'd pay more for convenience and lower heat output. But number of PCIe lanes per buck comes first.

  15. Received thanks from:

    Iota (31-07-2018)

  16. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked
    304 times in 221 posts

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear

    Quote Originally Posted by Dashers View Post
    Doesn't matter, not going to be buying a CPU with 16 PCIe lanes. Threadripper is looking like the smart money, although I'm not liking the sound of having to switch between game mode etc.

    I'd pay more for convenience and lower heat output. But number of PCIe lanes per buck comes first.
    Curious as to what you use all your PCIe lanes for? 10Gig, PCIe SSD or a RAID card?

  17. #16
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    31,841
    Thanks
    3,839
    Thanked
    5,132 times in 3,958 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Intel Core i9-9900K 3DMark Time Spy benchmark results appear



    I saw that posted on OcUK forums - not sure if true or not??

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •