Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 22

Thread: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    27,390
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,693 times in 587 posts

    Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    Similar to the Spectre and Meltdown flaws, it affects Intel processors from 2015 onwards.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked
    97 times in 61 posts

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    Well...the spectre and meltdown flaw opened a can of worms!

  3. #3
    I'm special azrael-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Posts
    852
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked
    74 times in 67 posts
    • azrael-'s system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8C-WS
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon E3-1245v2 3.4 GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16 GB ECC DDR3 1333 MHz
      • Storage:
      • 256 GB Samsung 830, 1 TB Samsung 850 EVO, 6 TB WD HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ASUS GTX 970 TurboOC 4 GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic X-Series 560W
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian 550D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell 2209WA
      • Internet:
      • VDSL 55/12 Mbit/s

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    AMD CPUs are not affected by L1TF.
    is what I take away from this. Once again Intel is hit the hardest (or rather, singularly). Really shows how they've played fast and loose with processor security over the years ...despite all their promises.

  4. #4
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    8,982
    Thanks
    410
    Thanked
    889 times in 759 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • M5A-97 EVO R2.0
      • CPU:
      • FX-8350
      • Memory:
      • 16GB ECC 1333
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 28 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    Quote Originally Posted by Tabbykatze View Post
    Well...the spectre and meltdown flaw opened a can of worms!
    Interesting that this was discovered before Meltdown/Spectre were made public, I haven't heard whether the researchers knew about Meltdown before they started looking at this, would be interesting to know.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked
    97 times in 61 posts

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    Interesting that this was discovered before Meltdown/Spectre were made public, I haven't heard whether the researchers knew about Meltdown before they started looking at this, would be interesting to know.
    Did they know about these before Spectre/Meltdown?

  6. #6
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 2 posts

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    Does anyone know of a catalogue of flaws that you can check, by cpu, to see if its affected by and if/when a fix is available (I know, this is restricted by mobo peeps also)?

    Keeping track of all these flaws is getting ridiculous.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,184
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    61 times in 53 posts

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    All I see from the recent 'flaws' in intel designs is that my next purchase will be an amd processor.... the odds were it was going to be anyways but still.

    I wonder how many more are going to crop up, really does seem like intel have been 'cutting corners' to ensure they have the 'performance' crown.

  8. #8
    £1000 Tesco Value Beer CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Moosetopia
    Posts
    28,348
    Thanks
    3,134
    Thanked
    4,367 times in 3,386 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    Phoronix have tested the effects of the flaws under Linux:

    https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...rly-look&num=1


    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,387
    Thanks
    135
    Thanked
    279 times in 222 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    Quote Originally Posted by rabidmunkee View Post
    Does anyone know of a catalogue of flaws that you can check, by cpu, to see if its affected by and if/when a fix is available (I know, this is restricted by mobo peeps also)?

    Keeping track of all these flaws is getting ridiculous.
    Then don't bother. They aren't a concern to normal users.
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  10. #10
    £1000 Tesco Value Beer CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Moosetopia
    Posts
    28,348
    Thanks
    3,134
    Thanked
    4,367 times in 3,386 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    Then don't bother. They aren't a concern to normal users.
    Meltdown/Spectre has impacted I/O performance,which does affect certain openworld and modded games more than the normal FPS games,most websites tested.

    The Witcher 3 saw performance drop by nearly 10% according to DF and that is a very well optimised openworld game using a modern engine,and no wonder when you consider how some of these games work in the first place(a hint is how you can traverse large areas without hitting a loading screen). For normal games you did see a 3% to 4% drop on the latest Intel CPUs.

    I certainly noticed it in FO4,especially the modded playthrough I am running now as the game is I/O dependent even in its basic form since Creation is a poorly optimised engine.Then Bethesda implemented a build system into the engine,which means if you build a very large settlement,there is a delay getting to build menus measured in how fast the primary storage is!

    To put it in context,when the game is modded and with large settlements it can get unplayable when run off a normal hard disk - the patches have meant I will be upgrading earlier. There is far more stuttering now after the patches in areas which have a lot of assets loading involved(think city areas).

    Plus for the batched RAW to JPG and DNG conversions I do with noise reduction,its bad enough the CPU is fully used,but there is an I/O bottleneck there too,so I make sure its done SSD to SSD.

    Edit!!

    Plus almost all of the tests are with SKL and newer not older CPUs like Ivy Bridge.

    Second Edit!!

    Also I checked on Reddit there was some comments from people with older CPUs running FO4 VR and modded FO4 who also saw similar issues too. The same stutters after the new updates.

    I am not happy.
    Last edited by CAT-THE-FIFTH; 16-08-2018 at 01:18 AM.


    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    159
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    10th gen cant come soon enough.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked
    97 times in 61 posts

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    Then don't bother. They aren't a concern to normal users.
    Security risks are concerns to everyone and to say otherwise is irresponsible.

  13. #13
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    8,982
    Thanks
    410
    Thanked
    889 times in 759 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • M5A-97 EVO R2.0
      • CPU:
      • FX-8350
      • Memory:
      • 16GB ECC 1333
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 28 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    Quote Originally Posted by Tabbykatze View Post
    Did they know about these before Spectre/Meltdown?
    Before Spectre/meltdown were published, but I think after they were discovered. So either they knew before the rest of us because that is their job to be well informed, or this is one of those ideas where it was just the right time for it to be discovered.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tabbykatze View Post
    Security risks are concerns to everyone and to say otherwise is irresponsible.
    I interpreted what he said as "Don't bother tracking all the flaws, just patch as most users won't notice any difference."

    Obviously there are some outliers like Cat with his sluggish Fallout game, and Linux developers whose compiles might go 20% slower, but I hear very few people complain that their PC has slowed from the fixes.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,324
    Thanks
    258
    Thanked
    276 times in 194 posts

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    Before Spectre/meltdown were published, but I think after they were discovered. So either they knew before the rest of us because that is their job to be well informed, or this is one of those ideas where it was just the right time for it to be discovered.
    I think they were both around the same time, spectre and meltdown were (iirc) published around January and this seems to be around the same time give or take 3-4 weeks.

    As you suggest though all the speculative execution vulnerabilities were just about timing, (afaik) there had been a good few years of research from the security community on it, sort of like standing on the shoulders, i think they knew, theoretically, that it could be exploited so it was just a matter of working out how to do it, once they worked out how it opened the floodgates.

  15. #15
    £1000 Tesco Value Beer CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Moosetopia
    Posts
    28,348
    Thanks
    3,134
    Thanked
    4,367 times in 3,386 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    Obviously there are some outliers like Cat with his sluggish Fallout game
    I think it will be cheaper and less troublesome for me to stop playing it at this rate!!


    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

  16. #16
    Cinnamon Roll
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    429
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked
    21 times in 20 posts
    • Ozaron's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z170 SLI Plus
      • CPU:
      • i5-6600K @ 4.3GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16GB HyperX DDR4 2666MHz CL14
      • Storage:
      • Toshiba X300 4TB (2), Samsung 850 Evo 500GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic M12-II 620w
      • Case:
      • In Win 707 ATX
      • Operating System:
      • W10 Enterprise 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • BenQ GW2765HT
      • Internet:
      • 150KB/s ↓ 50KB/s ↑ ~35ms

    Re: Intel releases updates for 'Foreshadow' CPU flaws

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    Obviously there are some outliers like Cat with his sluggish Fallout game, and Linux developers whose compiles might go 20% slower, but I hear very few people complain that their PC has slowed from the fixes.
    Strange how some people in the not so distant past crowed and rejoiced over the IPC and speed benefits transitioning from Ivy through to Kaby, then upon losing most of that clock for clock in security updates they "don't even notice", it's almost as if they couldn't tell the difference to start with. That, or they're not interested in recieving the security they were meant to have at start and losing their precious 5-10 FPS.

    Quote Originally Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH View Post
    I think it will be cheaper and less troublesome for me to stop playing it at this rate!!
    Well, you'd have far less "please Bethesda do something vaguely competent and make a game engine which isn't awful, or at least patch improve this one" social engineering work to do.

  17. Received thanks from:

    MLyons (16-08-2018)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •