Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 33

Thread: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    27,967
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,842 times in 625 posts

    Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    Upcoming RTX 2080 Time Spy score is approx 5 per cent better than the GTX 1080 Ti.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    268
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    15 times in 13 posts

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    "the cheapest RTX 2080 cards are approx £715 to pre-order." Now that's a large amount of cash. Also price match between Scan and Amazon, when buying, would be a sensible idea. (Easier to return to Amazon)

  3. #3
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    10,911
    Thanks
    967
    Thanked
    930 times in 692 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Strix Z370-G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-8700K
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LPX 3000C15
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 960 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define C Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MG279Q
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps Virgin Cable

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    Colour me shocked. Absolutely shocked. I in no way anticipated this lackluster performance bump.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    My happy place
    Posts
    157
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked
    12 times in 10 posts
    • afiretruck's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X399 Designare Ex
      • CPU:
      • AMD Threadripper 1900X
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 32GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 250GB NVMe SSD RAID 1 (root) + 1.25TB SSD RAID 5 (6 x 250GB) (home) + 900p 280GB SSD (scratch)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX Vega 64 (Linux)
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RMi 850
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Core X71
      • Operating System:
      • Arch Linux (Antergos)

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    £100 more for only a ~5% performance bump? Really?

    I know they've added some new-fangled features, but they aren't going to be utilised properly for a long while and won't benefit performance anyway.

    What are they playing at here??

  5. #5
    Gentoo Ricer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Galway
    Posts
    10,911
    Thanks
    967
    Thanked
    930 times in 692 posts
    • aidanjt's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Strix Z370-G
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-8700K
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Corsiar LPX 3000C15
      • Storage:
      • 500GB Samsung 960 EVO
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750W
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define C Mini
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Asus MG279Q
      • Internet:
      • 240mbps Virgin Cable

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    Quote Originally Posted by afiretruck View Post
    What are they playing at here??
    They're playing the 'we've cornered the market and we can charge pretty much whatever we want' game.
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    ...every time Creative bring out a new card range their advertising makes it sound like they have discovered a way to insert a thousand Chuck Norris super dwarfs in your ears...

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    290
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    30 times in 26 posts
    • iworrall's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus B350M TUF Gaming
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 2700X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB C14 Team Group "Dark Pro"
      • Storage:
      • 512Gb Samsung 970 Evo NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix Advanced GTX1080
      • PSU:
      • BeQuiet 1KW
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Core V21
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 / Kubuntu 19.04
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator X34A
      • Internet:
      • Sky Fibre

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    Guess I'll be keeping my 1080 until the 3000-series drops then.

  7. #7
    Senior Member cptwhite_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,626
    Thanks
    425
    Thanked
    415 times in 299 posts
    • cptwhite_uk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-Z77Z-UD3H
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 3570k @ 4.2Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb DDR3 Corsair Vengeance LP 1600Mhz
      • Storage:
      • SanDisk Ultra II 960Gb SSD / 750Gb Samsung F1
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI Gaming X GTX1080 8Gb
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 550W VX
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design R4
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Home
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2713HM (2560x1440 IPS Panel)
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 200Mbps

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    Nvidia cherry picked graph showed performance without DLSS around 48% faster than 1080, 3D mark score shows to be around 38% faster...sounds about what we could expect given cherry picked results. The 1080 Ti is around 35% faster than the 1080 for reference when both cards are running at 4K, or 25 to 30% faster at 1440p.

    I reckon the 2080 will just about be able hold 4K / 60fps in most titles with high/ultra settings, suspect nVidia will have targeted that as a baseline.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Geneva, Switzerland
    Posts
    209
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    18 times in 9 posts

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    Well, lets do some math:

    RTX 2080 has 15% more CUDA cores (2944 cores while 1080 has 2560), has 5% higher freq(2025 mhz while 1080 has 1911 Mhz). That's about 20% advantage just there.So it seems to me that core for core at the same freq it is more like 10-15% faster.Not bad, but certainly nothing special.

    On the other hand AMD says their 7nm Vega is 1.35 faster while using 50% less power.

    I say wait a month or two.
    The more you live, less you die. More you play, more you die. Isn't it great.

  9. #9
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    The performance is as we expected, right? Seems in line with all other performance "leaks."

  10. #10
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    85
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post
    • Faiakes's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7-6700K
      • Memory:
      • G.Skill 3000 C15 - 16GB
      • Storage:
      • Intel 750
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 860W
      • Case:
      • HSPC Tech Station
      • Operating System:
      • Win10 - Fast Insider
      • Monitor(s):
      • BenQ 32"

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    The driver the 2080 uses appears to be newer than the other two.

  11. #11
    Admin team peterb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Southampton
    Posts
    18,896
    Thanks
    2,690
    Thanked
    3,238 times in 2,566 posts
    • peterb's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Nascom 2
      • CPU:
      • Z80B
      • Memory:
      • 48K 8 bit memory on separate card
      • Storage:
      • Audio cassette tape - home built 5.25" floppy drive
      • Graphics card(s):
      • text output (composite video)
      • PSU:
      • Home built
      • Case:
      • Home built
      • Operating System:
      • Nas-sys
      • Monitor(s):
      • 12" monocrome composite video input
      • Internet:
      • No networking capability on this machine

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    Speaking as a non gamer - I couldn't see any justification for ditching a perfectly good current generation GPU for such a meagre performance increase at such a cost.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

    Been helped or just 'Like' a post? Use the Thanks button!
    My broadband speed - 750 Meganibbles/minute

  12. Received thanks from:

    Iota (28-08-2018),kalniel (29-08-2018)

  13. #12
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    28
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    Still on 970. Staying there for a while yet.

  14. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    317
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked
    21 times in 18 posts

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    Quote Originally Posted by aidanjt View Post
    Colour me shocked. Absolutely shocked. I in no way anticipated this lackluster performance bump.
    It's pretty much standard for next year's card to have similar performance to this year's card one step up, i.e. the xx70 to be akin to last year's xx80, or in this case the xx80 to last year's xx80Ti.

    Obviously there are exceptions, but that's the rule of thumb. But then there are usually other benefits on the processing: new features, power efficiency or whatever. It has never made sense to upgrade from a card that's less than 12 (or even 24) months old to another card that's only one step on the ladder from the one you already had.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fogoldgaming View Post
    Still on 970. Staying there for a while yet.
    You get it. Good move, still a great card.

  15. #14
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    95
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts
    • mikeo's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI Z370 Gaming M5
      • CPU:
      • I7 8700k @ 4.9 all cores
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 2666
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 970 EVO, Samsung SM951 NVMe, EVO 850, EVO 840, Vertex 4, Vertex 2 & 2x F3 1TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 1080 TI Gaming
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX 750w
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-B25F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64 (retail)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG
      • Internet:
      • Xilo/Uno broadband partial LLU via TalkTalk

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    The new cards in my opinion, are just not worth the money.

    Rather spend my money on a decent quad HD G-sync monitor (like I've just done). And give this new generation of cards a miss. My 1070 is still more than holding it's own. Might need to drop the graphics setting/s from Ultra to very high ... but I can live with that.

    Each to their own I suppose. But I find it amazing that anyone is prepared to drop over a grand on one of the new 2080ti's! Especially when you consider how fast graphics cards age and drop money like a stone. Almost as bad a buying a new car(ha).
    Live long and prosper.

  16. #15
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    1,033
    Thanks
    128
    Thanked
    66 times in 59 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8P67 PRO
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 2700K
      • Memory:
      • 12GB DDR3-1600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    Quote Originally Posted by Otherhand View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by aidanjt View Post
    Colour me shocked. Absolutely shocked. I in no way anticipated this lackluster performance bump.
    It's pretty much standard for next year's card to have similar performance to this year's card one step up, i.e. the xx70 to be akin to last year's xx80, or in this case the xx80 to last year's xx80Ti.

    Obviously there are exceptions, but that's the rule of thumb. But then there are usually other benefits on the processing: new features, power efficiency or whatever. It has never made sense to upgrade from a card that's less than 12 (or even 24) months old to another card that's only one step on the ladder from the one you already had.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fogoldgaming View Post
    Still on 970. Staying there for a while yet.
    You get it. Good move, still a great card.
    It's also pretty much standard for said new card to NOT match the price of said old card. New *70 is usually priced around or a bump above old *70. A better way to look at it is cost vs performance. You normally get a 20-30% increase in performance for roughly the same cost.

  17. #16
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Moonbase Alpha, Habitation Pod C
    Posts
    33
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy scores surface

    Quote Originally Posted by afiretruck View Post
    £100 more for only a ~5% performance bump? Really?
    No, not really.
    The article states the RTX 2080 is 35% faster in the benchmark than the GTX 1080.
    This figure can only get better with any driver improvements or software optimizations.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •