Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 30

Thread: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    27,514
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,700 times in 589 posts

    Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    PT’s tests were behind Intel's “world’s best gaming processor” claims at the launch.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member cptwhite_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,570
    Thanks
    419
    Thanked
    407 times in 293 posts
    • cptwhite_uk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-Z77Z-UD3H
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 3570k @ 4.2Ghz
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb DDR3 Corsair Vengeance LP 1600Mhz
      • Storage:
      • SanDisk Ultra II 960Gb SSD / 750Gb Samsung F1
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI Gaming X GTX1080 8Gb
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 550W VX
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design R4
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Home
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2713HM (2560x1440 IPS Panel)
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 200Mbps

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    Really interesting view, people should also watch this from Jim @ AdoredTV which gives a bit of a history lesson in how Intel has distorted benchmarks in the past through Sysmark


  3. Received thanks from:

    outwar6010 (11-10-2018),SUMMONER (11-10-2018)

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Redditch, United Kingdom
    Posts
    302
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    9 times in 6 posts
    • aniilv's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte B85
      • CPU:
      • i5-4570
      • Memory:
      • 8GB
      • Storage:
      • 160GB Raptor 10k rpm
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 760GTX 2GB
      • PSU:
      • 550W Gigabyte
      • Case:
      • Antec
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    So, let me get this straight. When AMD launched their CPU's, intel fanboys called upon using 4k as benchmark as useless because...reasons.

    Now when Intel does their benchmarks in 1080p, AMD fanboys calls them useless because...reasons

    oh, internet

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,393
    Thanks
    276
    Thanked
    290 times in 201 posts

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    Putting the deeply flawed testing of the 2700x aside for a moment does anyone think it's rather strange that in most of their test the 9980XE and 9900X suck so badly at gaming? I mean the article shows a screen shot of Assassins Creed with a 5-8% benchmark deficit and 10% lower FPS but if you look at some of the other results in the PDF the 9980XE and 9900X are like 40-50% slower.

    I know they're higher core CPUs but if you compare PT results of 9980XE and 9900X to TR the Intel high core count (8+) CPUs really suck.

    Quote Originally Posted by aniilv View Post
    So, let me get this straight. When AMD launched their CPU's, intel fanboys called upon using 4k as benchmark as useless because...reasons.

    Now when Intel does their benchmarks in 1080p, AMD fanboys calls them useless because...reasons

    oh, internet
    It goes far deeper than simply different resolutions, PT set 'game mode' for the 2700x and so disabled half the cores, they used a top end heatsink for Intel and TR but used the out of the box one for the 2700x, they used 64GB of RAM in four banks, and that's just some of the problems people have with the way PT tested.

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    My happy place
    Posts
    129
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • afiretruck's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X399 Designare Ex
      • CPU:
      • AMD Threadripper 1900X
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 32GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB NVMe RAID 5 + 6TB HDD RAID 10
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX Vega 64 (Linux), GTX 980Ti (Windows VM)
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RMi 850
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Core X71
      • Operating System:
      • Arch Linux (Antergos)

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    Cooler choice: We chose Noctua for the CPU coolers, due to having almost identical systems in the NH-U14S (Intel) and NH-U14S TR4-SP3 (AMD), which allowed us to maintain a comparable thermal profile. Because we were not performing any overclocking on any configuration, and because AMD has said it was a good cooler, we stuck with the stock AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Wraith Prism cooler.
    How on Earth can they call this good testing methodology? They're changing more than one variable at a time! That's basic, primary school science!

    I know it's tricky to get the coolers exactly the same, especially with Threadripper involved, but that shouldn't have stopped them trying to get them as similar as possible.

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    131
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    Quote Originally Posted by cptwhite_uk View Post
    Really interesting view, people should also watch this from Jim @ AdoredTV which gives a bit of a history lesson in how Intel has distorted benchmarks in the past through Sysmark

    OT: Sorry but that guy has an accent that is very hard for me to follow what he is saying...

  8. Received thanks from:

    Corky34 (11-10-2018)

  9. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    My happy place
    Posts
    129
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • afiretruck's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X399 Designare Ex
      • CPU:
      • AMD Threadripper 1900X
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 32GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB NVMe RAID 5 + 6TB HDD RAID 10
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX Vega 64 (Linux), GTX 980Ti (Windows VM)
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RMi 850
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Core X71
      • Operating System:
      • Arch Linux (Antergos)

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    Quote Originally Posted by GinoLatino View Post
    OT: Sorry but that guy has an accent that is very hard for me to follow what he is saying...
    Would playing it at a slower speed help?

  10. #8
    "Ultra low end E-PEEN" CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Moosetopia
    Posts
    28,682
    Thanks
    3,189
    Thanked
    4,436 times in 3,428 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    His accent is perfectly understandable.....unless you never met a Scotsman in real life!!

    There are far more stronger Scottish accents!!


    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

  11. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    131
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    Quote Originally Posted by afiretruck View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by GinoLatino View Post
    OT: Sorry but that guy has an accent that is very hard for me to follow what he is saying...
    Would playing it at a slower speed help?
    I just tried, doesn't help much. English is not my native language, but I perfectly understand many other youtubers. This is just a strain.

  12. #10
    Long member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    671
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked
    138 times in 99 posts
    • philehidiot's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Father's bored
      • CPU:
      • Cockroach brain V0.1
      • Memory:
      • Innebriated, unwritten
      • Storage:
      • Big Yellow Self Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Semi chewed Crayola Mega Pack
      • PSU:
      • 20KW single phase direct grid supply
      • Case:
      • Closed, Open, Cold
      • Operating System:
      • Cockroach
      • Monitor(s):
      • The mental health nurses
      • Internet:
      • Please.

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    I think the cooling solution is an easy one to do. Whilst if you're going for a real scientific approach you should eliminate it as a factor and go for nitrogen or something daft, we're not really going down that route here. The approach should be to replicate what consumers can reasonably achieve in the reduction of bottlenecks and also, it's important to remember that when you're testing a processor, the heat production is a characteristic which will affect performance and should therefore be see as a tested variable and not a confounding one to be minimised. I would simply therefore go for a model of AIO liquid cooler which has similar specifications (in terms of heat capacity and fan airflow, blah blah) which has adaptors for both CPUs under test. This is a reasonably high end solution which will reduce bottlenecking due to heat in most circumstances to what a consumer can reasonably achieve.

    "Because AMD say it's a good cooler" means nothing in quantitative testing. You want numbers to make objective comparisons. Ford say their Fiesta is a good car but that's because they spent ages lying and covering up the occasional external combustion of the internal combustion engine within. If you're going to take a manufacturer's word on things like this then there is logically no point in benchmarking anything ever becuase we can just trust the manufacturer.

  13. #11
    I'm special azrael-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Posts
    868
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked
    76 times in 69 posts
    • azrael-'s system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8C-WS
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon E3-1245v2 3.4 GHz
      • Memory:
      • 16 GB ECC DDR3 1333 MHz
      • Storage:
      • 256 GB Samsung 830, 1 TB Samsung 850 EVO, 6 TB WD HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • eVGA GTX 1080 SC Gaming, 8 GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic X-Series 560W
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian 550D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator XB271HU
      • Internet:
      • VDSL 55/12 Mbit/s

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    I still haven't found out who "Soldier Tim" is...

  14. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    MOMBASA
    Posts
    810
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    20 times in 19 posts

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    I wonder why people spend upwards of $500 on a cpu just to game. Gaming slows down economies coz that time wasted could be spent learning Angular or for MORE important things.

  15. #13
    Long Time Lurker
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    346
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked
    16 times in 15 posts
    • mercyground's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UDP4
      • CPU:
      • AMD Phenom II X4 955 (3.2ghz)
      • Memory:
      • 8GB
      • Storage:
      • 160gb intel SSD + 3TB of HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 4770 512mb
      • PSU:
      • Akaska 550w
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG M1917TM
      • Internet:
      • 50mb Fibre

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    rookie mistake with game mode on the AMD. And they should have known that ppl would pick appart the data.

    Marketing gone wrong. opcorn:

  16. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    My happy place
    Posts
    129
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked
    8 times in 8 posts
    • afiretruck's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X399 Designare Ex
      • CPU:
      • AMD Threadripper 1900X
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 32GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB NVMe RAID 5 + 6TB HDD RAID 10
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX Vega 64 (Linux), GTX 980Ti (Windows VM)
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RMi 850
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Core X71
      • Operating System:
      • Arch Linux (Antergos)

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    Quote Originally Posted by lumireleon View Post
    ... Angular or for MORE important things.
    Wait. There's more important things than Angular???

  17. Received thanks from:

    Jonj1611 (11-10-2018)

  18. #15
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    45
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    Anyone remember CTS flaws? I think even the most skeptical should have realised that AMD is being deliberately screwed from every angle because intel have nothing new or secure to offer.

    "If you have admin access to an AMD system you could pose a security risk"
    "If you turn off half of Ryzen's cores it's only 50% as fast"
    "intel have a 28 core part that can do 5ghz on all cores"
    "meltdown is an industry wide problem"

    All of these statements were officially backed up by or given by intel, or more likely commissioned by them, looking at you CTS! All of these statements are misleading at best or outright lies at worst.

  19. #16
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    14,854
    Thanks
    1,170
    Thanked
    2,177 times in 1,801 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • HP Pavilion
      • CPU:
      • A10 4600M
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR3-1600 SODIMM
      • Storage:
      • 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon HD7660G (IGP)
      • PSU:
      • Battery/HP 19v brick
      • Case:
      • HP Pavilion G6
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1366x768 laptop panel

    Re: Principled Technologies (PT) responds to i9-9900K test queries

    Quote Originally Posted by afiretruck View Post
    Wait. There's more important things than Angular???
    Almost literally *anything* is more important than Angular. Except R. R can sit down and shut up.

  20. Received thanks from:

    afiretruck (11-10-2018)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •