Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    At SC18 it showed off performance in several real world HPC/AI applications.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,994
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,591 times in 1,346 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    I really would have kept quiet about the Stream Triad test. 50% more memory channels than Epyc, 30% more performance is a dubious win on something that scales really really really well against memory bandwidth.

    Edit: Do Intel say whether they had threading turned off on the AMD platform like last time?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    3,526
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked
    468 times in 326 posts

    Re: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    I wonder if Intel are aware what the acronym of Cascade Lake Advanced Performance is, do they have it.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    My happy place
    Posts
    230
    Thanks
    75
    Thanked
    16 times in 14 posts
    • afiretruck's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X399 Designare Ex
      • CPU:
      • AMD Threadripper 1900X
      • Memory:
      • Corsair 32GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 2x 250GB NVMe + 2x 1TB SATA
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX Vega 64 + GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RMi 850
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define R6
      • Operating System:
      • Linux Mint 19
      • Monitor(s):
      • Screeny

    Re: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    Is Hyper Threading enabled on these new glued-together CPUs?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked
    17 times in 17 posts

    Re: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    Comparing with last year AMD product when the new one will probably come out around the same time if not sooner.
    It is also fun that they compare the "deep learning inference" with their own old product instead of Epyc 7601 like the other comparison...

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    ATLANTIS
    Posts
    1,207
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    28 times in 26 posts

    Re: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    Should Nvidia be scared too?

  7. #7
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Strand, Cape Town, Western-Cape
    Posts
    81
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    • KN1GHT's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Hero 6 x370 (Wi-Fi)
      • CPU:
      • AMD R7-1700 @ 3.918GHz (1.35v)
      • Memory:
      • 32GB's of 3200MHz Gskill Ripjaws @ 3066MHz
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Samsung 960 EVO, 250GB 5400RPM, 500GB 7200RPM, 1TB 7200RPM, 2TB 7200RPM
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1xPalit Zetstream GTX1080ti @ 2025Core & 5900Mem
      • PSU:
      • Andyson AD-700YYZZZ N Series 700W 80 Plus Titanium Certified Semi-Modular Black Desktop Power Supply
      • Case:
      • Phanteks PH-EC416PSTG_BK Eclipse P400S Silent-Edition Tempered Glass Satin Black Steel
      • Operating System:
      • Dual Boot Windows 7 Pro & Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 1xSamsung 32inch LED TV (1366x768 native) & 1xAcer 23inch (1920x1080) using DSR (3840x2160)
      • Internet:
      • 4mbps uncapped

    Re: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    I wonder if they disabled SMT for AMD lol, its not too low for intel honestly.

  8. #8
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Strand, Cape Town, Western-Cape
    Posts
    81
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts
    • KN1GHT's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Hero 6 x370 (Wi-Fi)
      • CPU:
      • AMD R7-1700 @ 3.918GHz (1.35v)
      • Memory:
      • 32GB's of 3200MHz Gskill Ripjaws @ 3066MHz
      • Storage:
      • 250GB Samsung 960 EVO, 250GB 5400RPM, 500GB 7200RPM, 1TB 7200RPM, 2TB 7200RPM
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1xPalit Zetstream GTX1080ti @ 2025Core & 5900Mem
      • PSU:
      • Andyson AD-700YYZZZ N Series 700W 80 Plus Titanium Certified Semi-Modular Black Desktop Power Supply
      • Case:
      • Phanteks PH-EC416PSTG_BK Eclipse P400S Silent-Edition Tempered Glass Satin Black Steel
      • Operating System:
      • Dual Boot Windows 7 Pro & Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • 1xSamsung 32inch LED TV (1366x768 native) & 1xAcer 23inch (1920x1080) using DSR (3840x2160)
      • Internet:
      • 4mbps uncapped

    Re: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    I'm also wondering what is the total cost of ownership difference between the two systems.
    I wouldn't be surprised if AMD's setup is 4x cheaper.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Taichung City
    Posts
    898
    Thanks
    281
    Thanked
    172 times in 121 posts
    • mtyson's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte GA-B85M-HD3
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 4790T
      • Memory:
      • 12GB
      • Storage:
      • Sandisk 128GB SSD + Kingston 500GB SSD + NAS etc
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Radeon RX 580 Nitro+
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 430W
      • Case:
      • Zalman Z9 Plus
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC 31.5-inch VA QHD monitor
      • Internet:
      • 100MB Virgin fibre

    Re: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    Lenovo has leaked 39 different Cascade Lake processor models from the Xeon Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum product lines.

    The leak doesn't include the headlining 48C processor, so that will likely be released somewhat later.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked
    304 times in 221 posts

    Re: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    As above, there is no mention of Hyper Threading.

    It's a bit naff that this pile of knee jerk trash gets Hexus service and the noted IPC of AMD doesn't. Which is far more interesting than a UPI glued dual processor that's overly hot and no business will want because it's literally a stop gap platform.

  11. #11
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,994
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,591 times in 1,346 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    Quote Originally Posted by afiretruck View Post
    Is Hyper Threading enabled on these new glued-together CPUs?
    It sounds like it isn't, presumably because 350W is already more than enough TDP so turning the wick up wouldn't be wise. I presume that is why on previous benchmarks the AMD platform also had threading turned off.

  12. #12
    Bagnaj97
    Guest

    Re: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    Slide 6 in the Intel PDF is where the juicy details lie. SMT is off for Linpack, for the MILC, WRF and OpenFOAM tests they've left it enabled but are only running 1 thread/core, so you're still not getting full performance from the AMD chips. Also "MILC version: 7.8.1 “intel-recipe” branch" and everything possible is compiled with the Intel compiler.

    Basically take the numbers with a bucketful of salt.

  13. #13
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    1,340
    Thanks
    132
    Thanked
    94 times in 80 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus somethingorother
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    Quote Originally Posted by Corky34 View Post
    I wonder if Intel are aware what the acronym of Cascade Lake Advanced Performance is, do they have it.

    "Experience the power of the CLAP, coming soon from Intel!"

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    292
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked
    11 times in 10 posts
    • Richh's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ROG Maximus VIII Hero
      • CPU:
      • Core i7 8700K delid, H115i Platinum
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Corsair Dominator GT 3200
      • Storage:
      • Loads
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA GTX970 FTW+
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX860i
      • Case:
      • Custom open frame
      • Operating System:
      • Win10 Pro x64 / occasionally Win 7 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • ROG Swift PG279Q, Sony 48A9

    Re: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    Quote Originally Posted by Corky34 View Post
    I wonder if Intel are aware what the acronym of Cascade Lake Advanced Performance is, do they have it.
    Maybe they're expecting a round of applause. ;-)
    BH6, BX6 2.0, BE6, BE6-II 2.0, ST6-RAID, BE6-II 2.0 (again), BD7-RAID, BD7II-RAID, IC7-G, IC7 Max3, AB9 QuadGT, IX38 QuadGT. IX58... Oh, b*ll*cks. RIP Abit

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    231
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    13 times in 10 posts

    Re: Intel shares further Cascade Lake performance data

    Quote Originally Posted by Corky34 View Post
    I wonder if Intel are aware what the acronym of Cascade Lake Advanced Performance is, do they have it.

    Good job they used lake instead of river.

  16. Received thanks from:

    afiretruck (13-11-2018)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •