Researchers test 400Hz 2500ppi graphene pixel displays

[HEXUS]

High frame rate, power efficient, GIMOD displays could soon be commercialised for VR.

Read more.

[FRISH]

I look forward to the Hexus giveaway

[plexabit]

This is really cool. Does "Reflective" mean it works more like an e-ink display as compared to LCD/LED screens that are emissive?

[philehidiot]

This is really cool. Does "Reflective" mean it works more like an e-ink display as compared to LCD/LED screens that are emissive?

"Modulates white light from the environment" combined with the claimed power efficiencies sounds like it absorbs white light and alters what wavelengths are absorbed / reflected back.

[ik9000]

well the screen might do 2000Hz but what kind of card would we need to support it? LN2 titans from 2028 in quad SLI?

[Cracker]

well the screen might do 2000Hz but what kind of card would we need to support it? LN2 titans from 2028 in quad SLI?

Do we need a powerfull card to take advantage of 144hz monitors ? No we dont.

Do we need a powerfull card to take advantage of the 400hz, No, but we need the cable standards and outputs to support the refresh rate.

[plexabit]

"Modulates white light from the environment" combined with the claimed power efficiencies sounds like it absorbs white light and alters what wavelengths are absorbed / reflected back.

Huh, I feel like this would really mess with color accuracy based on the surrounding envoironment. I guess that's why the stated application is VR, where the environment is more easily controlled.

[ik9000]

Do we need a powerfull card to take advantage of 144hz monitors ? No we dont.

Do we need a powerfull card to take advantage of the 400hz, No, but we need the cable standards and outputs to support the refresh rate.

I see where you're coming from, but my point is that you're just showing the same image over and over again. There's a point of diminishing returns. Unless you're going to try to get it to show more than a static image - in which case the card supplying it needs to be able to feed it at a decent FPS - and that is very much dependent on the GPU. The screen scanning and interlacing would be quite something at 2000Hz and could allow some incredible ray-tracing style effects if the cards can keep up. But currently they're working at their limits doing 60FPS well.

Welcome to Hexus btw.

[ik9000]

Huh, I feel like this would really mess with color accuracy based on the surrounding envoironment. I guess that's why the stated application is VR, where the environment is more easily controlled.

Yeah I had the same thought. Would it suck under flourescent strip with a low K bias? Is that why they're running it at the fair with a torch focussed on the sensor?

[albert89]

All I care about is when AMD will be using
graphene for their infinity fabric.

[albert89]

Hexus don't do giveaways. I have never won anything nor
have anyone I've asked have won anything ether.

[Moonister]

well the screen might do 2000Hz but what kind of card would we need to support it? LN2 titans from 2028 in quad SLI?

Do we need a powerfull card to take advantage of 144hz monitors ? No we dont.

Do we need a powerfull card to take advantage of the 400hz, No, but we need the cable standards and outputs to support the refresh rate.

yes we do! to take advantage of the 144hz fast panel and run games at 100fps+ you need a top tier expensive card.

I have 144hz monitor and honestly can't see difference over 100hz. Would like ULMB + G-sync + 100hz + low input lag combination though

[ETR316]

interesting and promising. I hope I am able to buy one.

[Luke7]

Hexus don't do giveaways. I have never won anything nor
have anyone I've asked have won anything ether.

Would you be interested in buying a tinfoil hat?

[Luke7]

Do we need a powerfull card to take advantage of 144hz monitors ? No we dont.

Do we need a powerfull card to take advantage of the 400hz, No, but we need the cable standards and outputs to support the refresh rate.

I see where you're coming from, but my point is that you're just showing the same image over and over again. There's a point of diminishing returns. Unless you're going to try to get it to show more than a static image - in which case the card supplying it needs to be able to feed it at a decent FPS - and that is very much dependent on the GPU. The screen scanning and interlacing would be quite something at 2000Hz and could allow some incredible ray-tracing style effects if the cards can keep up. But currently they're working at their limits doing 60FPS well.

Welcome to Hexus btw.

60fps? That depends entirely on what features are on and what resolution you're working with. A 2080 TI will handly manage 220 fps on ultra at 1440p on CS... 400fps doesn't seem much of a push considering how early this display tech is in terms of development...

[wilko]

Would you be interested in buying a tinfoil hat?