As long as it isn't an Astro Pi Sense HAT, way too crunchy
As long as it isn't an Astro Pi Sense HAT, way too crunchy
Hopefully they will deliver on this and make NVidia rethink their prices.
Is that coming from AMD? I bet Nvidia think RTX pricing is "very attractive", but I would beg to differ! Really hope AMD (or Intel) can deliver and give us a real second option.Elsewhere in the ChipHell post it is suggested that Navi 10 hardware come with a "very attractive" price and its power consumption will be a "surprise". We hope that's a good surprise given that it is to be manufactured on TSMC's low power 7nm process.
I wouldn't say it performs badly. I'm perhaps a little biased as I now despise Nvidia for how they've treated the consumer but based on what I've seen and bearing in mind the Vega64 is a last gen card Vs Nvidia's current gen card (there's over a year in it), there's precious little performance gain in the 2070 for a similar price (or it was when I bought my Vega64 for £440, haven't checked just lately).
Power use in the AMD card is atrocious and it won't do ray tracing well but neither will the 2070. I want to game at 1440P and ray tracing is currently just not up to that unless I spend an absolute furtune.
As above it's how they use the transistors and AMD cards are architecturally quite beautiful but they are more compute orientated, which is why they do so well at mining.
As someone who watches his content a lot I would have to disagree with you.
He is however biased towards innovation, technology and very pro consumer and sadly mostly AMD will fall into those categories.
If you check his Vaga content, Ryzen 2000 content, 1080ti review and RTX2080 review you will find that when AMD screws up he is very critical against them as well, in all honesty even when he is making a video placing AMD in a good light he would still be critical regarding certain things they do.
The only people who thinks he is biased towards AMD doesn't see a lot of Jim's content to be honest, since at face value it could some times seem like that, but one has to dig deeper.
games will surely support the new RTX tehnology from nvidia, but AMD does not support RTX. this is a clear dissadvantage from AMD right now
Not really, to get RTX with Nvidia you have to pay £500 minimum (RTX2070) and even then the RTX implementation would be quite negative to your gaming. So if you want good RTX you have to shell out £700 minimum (RTX2080). Some people won't go above £300 for their GPU which is the middle top-ish spot of the mid range (Cat please don't hurt me) so not having RTX is a "yeah, so?" from AMD.
AMD is not pushing HALO, they got burnt with the Fury and Vega 64, they are doing the right thing and just making money off of the volume sales in the Low-Mid market. Maybe in a couple of years when they've refined Navi/next tick in GPU architecture we will see 2x80ti competitors.
afiretruck (12-12-2018),Corky34 (12-12-2018)
Jim from Adored responding to some people trashing his video of which he go through some extremely level headed logic about peoples misgivings against his 'leak'.
If I didn't know any better, he would not look like an AMD lover as he is breaking down the misgivings (especially Extremetech who slammed his data) and doing a proper apples to apples comparison, calculations and push out:
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)