Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Intel Z390 socket analysis shows extra power pins unnecessary

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Intel Z390 socket analysis shows extra power pins unnecessary

    der8auer tests individual processor pins and tapes off multiple pins to prove hypothesis.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    eHM
    eHM is offline
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    20
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Intel Z390 socket analysis shows extra power pins unnecessary

    Are they unnecessary though? Without them Intel couldn't profit fron motherboard royalties as frequently...

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,385
    Thanks
    181
    Thanked
    304 times in 221 posts

    Re: Intel Z390 socket analysis shows extra power pins unnecessary

    Always love Der8auer for his really hands on and very strong investigative approaches. He may have muscles but that definitely hasn't detracted from his brains!

    Everyone knew what Intel said is "balderdash" but who is going to complain? Intel are going to look at this and go "yeah, and?" and there will be a barely discernible dip in sales. That's just how it is sadly

  4. #4
    Old Geezer
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Under a rusty bucket
    Posts
    539
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked
    42 times in 31 posts

    Re: Intel Z390 socket analysis shows extra power pins unnecessary

    Quote Originally Posted by Tabbykatze View Post

    Everyone knew what Intel said is "balderdash" but who is going to complain? Intel are going to look at this and go "yeah, and?" and there will be a barely discernible dip in sales. That's just how it is sadly
    The only way to stop Intel doing things like this, is to go AMD instead and let Intel know why but, it would need a coordinated effort by a huge number of customers and we know that isn't likely to happen.

  5. #5
    Editable... jimbouk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    2,911
    Thanks
    285
    Thanked
    249 times in 202 posts
    • jimbouk's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 3600
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance LPX 16 GB (2 x 8 GB) DDR4 3200 MHz C16
      • Storage:
      • Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB NVMe PCIe M.2 2280
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Pulse RX 580 8GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Core Gold GC-650
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC-V1100 ATX
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC CU34G2/BK 34" Widescreen
      • Internet:
      • EE FTC

    Re: Intel Z390 socket analysis shows extra power pins unnecessary

    Quote Originally Posted by Friesiansam View Post
    The only way to stop Intel doing things like this, is to go AMD instead and let Intel know why but, it would need a coordinated effort by a huge number of customers and we know that isn't likely to happen.
    PC box sellers will be happy as they want to sell new computers. I guess board manufacturers are a bit either way - old stock loses value but they get to sell more newer boards. Just the enthusiasts who really suffer. Performance gains weren't enough to justify getting new kit for me so ended up going second hand for the last upgrade.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    464
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    30 times in 23 posts
    • Bagpuss's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Pro Wi-Fi
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9-9900K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4 3400
      • Storage:
      • Gigabyte 512GB NVMe SSD, Crucial 1Tb NVMe SSD, 6Tb Seagate 7200
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 2080 Black Edition
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 850 RMx 850 Gold
      • Case:
      • Fractal Meshify C Copper Front Panel
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG UK850 27in 4K HDR Freesync/Gsync
      • Internet:
      • Three Mobile 4G Unlimited Data (35-45Mbit)

    Re: Intel Z390 socket analysis shows extra power pins unnecessary

    You can just imagine Intel & the Motherboard makers gathering in a remote hotel room somewhere agreeing on how they can stitch up the consumer once more with an unnecessary socket change.

  7. #7
    Missed by us all - RIP old boy spacein_vader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Darkest Northamptonshire
    Posts
    2,015
    Thanks
    184
    Thanked
    1,084 times in 410 posts
    • spacein_vader's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450 Tomahawk Max
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 5 3600
      • Memory:
      • 2x8GB Patriot Steel DDR4 3600mhz
      • Storage:
      • 1tb Sabrent Rocket NVMe (boot), 500GB Crucial MX100, 1TB Crucial MX200
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte Radeon RX5700 Gaming OC
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX 520W modular
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Meshify C
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • BenQ GW2765, Dell Ultrasharp U2412
      • Internet:
      • Zen Internet

    Re: Intel Z390 socket analysis shows extra power pins unnecessary

    Quote Originally Posted by Bagpuss View Post
    You can just imagine Intel & the Motherboard makers gathering in a remote hotel room somewhere agreeing on how they can stitch up the consumer once more with an unnecessary socket change.
    The motherboard makers are largely a patsy in this. They'd be more than happy to extend the life of their current range (a bios update is FAR cheaper than a full retooling,) and update their marketing than build a whole new set of boards.

    Intel has beaten them down before, with "unofficially" unlocked features being removed in bios updates. The contracts intel have with them are very restrictive.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    262
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    26 times in 25 posts
    • devBunny's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P9X79 Pro
      • CPU:
      • i7-3930
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Kingston HyperX
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Samsung 830
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 2 x GTX 560Ti
      • PSU:
      • OCZ ZX1000W Gold
      • Case:
      • Xigmatek Elysium
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 and Win XP in VMs
      • Monitor(s):
      • 3 x Dell 2410M 1920x1200 IPS

    Re: Intel Z390 socket analysis shows extra power pins unnecessary

    Quote Originally Posted by Tabbykatze View Post
    Always love Der8auer for his really hands on and very strong investigative approaches. He may have muscles but that definitely hasn't detracted from his brains!
    And probably the reverse, given that exercise, ostensibly done for the body, also gives a boost to the brain.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    3,526
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked
    468 times in 326 posts

    Re: Intel Z390 socket analysis shows extra power pins unnecessary

    As if further confirmation wasn't necessary at this point....



    The short of it is Onda have released a MoBo that supports 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th gen Intel CPUs with DDR3.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •