Read more.Red against Green at my favourite gaming resolution.
Read more.Red against Green at my favourite gaming resolution.
all Radeon fans are Content Creators. *Non-gaming Tests.
At the end, I don't believe it is as bad as people thought it would be...
Even power consumption compared to the 2080 isn't extremely exaggerated. If the electricity cost wasn't so aggravating where I live, I might have considering it.
Great value to content creators!
GJ
Now look here (Normal OC/UV for Vega 2, not extreme)
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/18315623
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/18316147
ZEN 3700X, HeroVI | 32GB 3800MHz CL16 | RTX 3080 OC/UV | XFX 760 PSU | 10Bit 27" IIyama 1440p FS | 1TB NVMe Sammie, 2xSamie 850 512GB | SB-AE7+Audio-Technica ATH-AD1000X | DeathStalker, Roccat Nyth
that's the thing undervolt o/c and it runs cooler less power hungry ..
What does it matter now if men believe or no?
What is to come will come. And soon you too will stand aside,
To murmur in pity that my words were true
(Cassandra, in Agamemnon by Aeschylus)
To see the wizard one must look behind the curtain ....
@tarinder
You mention that the RTX 2080 has "forward looking technologies", which I'm taking to mean DLSS and RTRT, so, I have a question to ask.
What do you think about NVIDIA not supporting ultrawide resolutions with their DLSS implementation?
You also say:
Does this mean that you are able to properly utilise DLSS? I'm getting some horrible blurring on my display at 3440x1440.Being fair, Nvidia is implementing performance-enhancing DLSS support from day one, and I'll cover just how good the technology is in a separate piece.
Last edited by Hoonigan; 14-02-2019 at 05:01 PM.
From Wikipedia: "QHD (Quad HD), WQHD (Wide Quad HD),[8] or 1440p,[9] is a display resolution of 2560 × 1440 pixels in a 16:9 aspect ratio. The name QHD reflects the fact that it has four times as many pixels as HD (720p). It is also commonly called WQHD, to emphasize it being a wide resolution, although that is technically unnecessary, since the HD resolutions are all wide. One advantage of using "WQHD" is avoiding confusion with qHD with a small q (960 × 540)."
WQHD refers to any 1440p resolution and not just the wider ones. Pedantic I know.
Doesnt the founders edition cost £799 while you can get that Radeon from £650? Not exactly a fair comparison isn't it?
it's actually worse for AMD in the UK, here the RTX 2080 is £680, (https://www.overclockers.co.uk/evga-geforce-rtx-2080-black-edition-8192mb-gddr6-pci-express-graphics-card-gx-31j-ea.html)
and the cheapest (that I could find) RADEON VII is £750, (https://www.overclockers.co.uk/asrock-radeon-rx-vega-vii-phantom-gaming-x-16gb-hbm2-pci-express-graphics-card-gx-001-ak.html)
How come you used the 2080FE and not a regular 2080? The extra $100USD makes a difference..
The 2080 still should have slightly higher frames, but its hard to make a proper "what does my dollar get me?" comparison.
I'm looking forward to some undervolt/OC benches with the Radeon 7.
If it does as well there as Vega 56/64 then it'll ruffle some feathers. Not that people should *have* to play the silicon lottery, but it is what it is and having the option is a good thing.
They're both reference models?
Nvidia are satisfying their "day one" bs by basically saying the driver is capable. But the DLSS is only as good as the training set which is dictated by the dev/Nvidia. So that means DLSS only comes to a select few and sadly, Hoonigan, you just don't cut it apparently!
But obviously a reviewer can't say that...
Sapphire Radeon VII is £649.99 at Scan, RTX 2080 FE is £749 (I know I just bought one this week). Although you can get the Gigabyte RTX2080 Windforce for £649.19 direct from Amazon.
Maybe as mentioned, comparable models (both reference designs used), either way you can buy both the VII and 2080 for £650 in the UK.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)