Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X passes through the EEC

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    28,217
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,844 times in 627 posts

    MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X passes through the EEC

    Sub $200 graphics card to widen mid-range Nvidia's GTX16 series options.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Long member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,093
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked
    195 times in 145 posts
    • philehidiot's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Father's bored
      • CPU:
      • Cockroach brain V0.1
      • Memory:
      • Innebriated, unwritten
      • Storage:
      • Big Yellow Self Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Semi chewed Crayola Mega Pack
      • PSU:
      • 20KW single phase direct grid supply
      • Case:
      • Closed, Open, Cold
      • Operating System:
      • Cockroach
      • Monitor(s):
      • The mental health nurses
      • Internet:
      • Please.

    Re: MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X passes through the EEC

    Cluster....ing.

    Swamp the range with products and you can use every bit of silicone also.

    Total opposite to AMD's targeted approach. Quite an interesting opposition of strategies.

  3. #3
    The Ace
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    358
    Thanks
    24
    Thanked
    4 times in 4 posts
    • abychristy's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI 970A-G46
      • CPU:
      • AMD 4.1 GHz AM3+ FX4100
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance 8GB DDR3 1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • 500+320 GB(internal) + 500 GB(external)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 280X OC Dual-X 3GB GDDR5
      • PSU:
      • Cooler Master Thunder 500W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master Elite 430 Black
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq GL2450
      • Internet:
      • 20 mbps

    Re: MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X passes through the EEC

    Funny now both AMD and Nvidia have their top tier and budget versions, where its Vega vs RTX and 16series+10series vs RX500s. Nvidia sure is attracting a lot of budget builders especially esports friendly gamers with these specs, and with the recent news of Ray tracing on AMD and Pascal series it sure seems to be great for the market also.
    JaChriz -Origin General Ace-STEAM

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    109
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    5 times in 4 posts

    Re: MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X passes through the EEC

    Quote Originally Posted by abychristy View Post
    Funny now both AMD and Nvidia have their top tier and budget versions, where its Vega vs RTX and 16series+10series vs RX500s. Nvidia sure is attracting a lot of budget builders especially esports friendly gamers with these specs, and with the recent news of Ray tracing on AMD and Pascal series it sure seems to be great for the market also.
    basically, in a price comparable situation between AMD and Nvidia GPUS which have comparable performance, I would go for the Nvidia GPU as a general rule of thumb they use less power.

  5. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    19
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X passes through the EEC

    Quote Originally Posted by will19565 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by abychristy View Post
    Funny now both AMD and Nvidia have their top tier and budget versions, where its Vega vs RTX and 16series+10series vs RX500s. Nvidia sure is attracting a lot of budget builders especially esports friendly gamers with these specs, and with the recent news of Ray tracing on AMD and Pascal series it sure seems to be great for the market also.
    basically, in a price comparable situation between AMD and Nvidia GPUS which have comparable performance, I would go for the Nvidia GPU as a general rule of thumb they use less power.
    Yes, but only because NV equivalent GPU's have much lower compute hardware capability.
    Otherwise, most AMD GPU's can easily be undervolted to consumer far less power (which actually brings their efficiency closer to NV's or surpasses it).
    Now, if you only game, that's fine, but I'd rater have highly capable compute card to boot and just undervolt it at stock which would not only give me the gaming performance and energy efficiency of equivalent NV gpu, but also computational power of an NV GPU's that basically a tier above the gaming equivalent of an AMD GPU (for example RX580 has pretty much the same same compute power of 1070/1080).

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •