Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 22 of 22

Thread: Intel roadmaps leak showing company's plans through 2021

  1. #17
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,986
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,588 times in 1,343 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Intel roadmaps leak showing company's plans through 2021

    If they keep applying the bits from 10nm that actually work back into 14nm (which I presume is where all the iterations come from) then 10nm will always be an outlier.

    Charlie claims Intel only have one or two 10nm lines left having converted the others to either 7nm development or back to 14nm for usable production. If those parts are indeed only good for extra low power products where performance isn't so important, then I guess the like us don't want them anyway.

    https://semiaccurate.com/2019/04/25/...els-10nm-woes/

  2. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,935
    Thanks
    171
    Thanked
    384 times in 311 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC

    Re: Intel roadmaps leak showing company's plans through 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by Corky34 View Post
    And it seems even ^^that^^ was more than they could chew.
    Reading between the lines from their results today where they did better than expected, their out-performance due to "cost control" might also be related to their under performance in getting 10nm out of the door
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  3. #19
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,986
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked
    1,588 times in 1,343 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 5900X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 2TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 39 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 900Mb/900Mb (CityFibre FttP)

    Re: Intel roadmaps leak showing company's plans through 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by badass View Post
    Reading between the lines from their results today where they did better than expected, their out-performance due to "cost control" might also be related to their under performance in getting 10nm out of the door
    I assumed that was down to their hiking prices due to the short supply of their own making.

  4. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Where you are not
    Posts
    1,330
    Thanks
    608
    Thanked
    103 times in 90 posts
    • Iota's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus Hero XI
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i9 9900KF
      • Memory:
      • CMD32GX4M2C3200C16
      • Storage:
      • 1 x 1TB / 3 x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia RTX 3090 Founders Edition
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX1200i
      • Case:
      • Corsair Obsidian 500D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung Odyssey G9
      • Internet:
      • 500Mbps BT FTTH

    Re: Intel roadmaps leak showing company's plans through 2021

    Again, most HEXUS readers, who are largely enthusiasts and PC gamers, will be interested in the upper rows
    Nope, I'm actually looking at the lowest part on the second image, Rocket Lake Xeon E (PCI Gen 4). Isn't Zen 2 (X570 chipset) PCI Gen 4? Would that mean Intel is going to be a full year behind AMD on this?

  5. #21
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Intel roadmaps leak showing company's plans through 2021

    Through 2021 or through to 2021?

  6. #22
    Long Time Lurker
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Dark Side of the Moon
    Posts
    396
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked
    23 times in 21 posts

    Re: Intel roadmaps leak showing company's plans through 2021

    tldr. Intel is screwed. the process is broken. they have too much to fix and not enough chips that are working. so anything that comes out partially working is being sold. (eg chips with no igfx cos they are fused off cos broken).

    AMD is having a field day. HP and Dell have given up and pushing out Ryzen laptops and Epyc servers instead.

    And Charlie still gets mocked... despite being right... AGAIN.

    Edit: what also amazes me is the idiots buying intels latest servers despite them being barely faster, few fixes... and 50% more expensive due to limited supply.

    Why anyone would buy a 52core 2x2 bolted together Xeon vs a 64core Epyc i dont know... specially as you can get 2x Epycs for the price of one xeon server... oh and did i mention that xeon is 400w's to cool?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •