If they keep applying the bits from 10nm that actually work back into 14nm (which I presume is where all the iterations come from) then 10nm will always be an outlier.
Charlie claims Intel only have one or two 10nm lines left having converted the others to either 7nm development or back to 14nm for usable production. If those parts are indeed only good for extra low power products where performance isn't so important, then I guess the like us don't want them anyway.
https://semiaccurate.com/2019/04/25/...els-10nm-woes/