Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 19

Thread: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    28,933
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,865 times in 638 posts

    The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    Plus benchmarks against Intel.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    76
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • 00oceanic's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS Sabertooth
      • CPU:
      • 4770k H90 Corsair
      • Memory:
      • 16GB DDRIII 1600MHz
      • Storage:
      • 7TB (Hitachi + Seagate)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 7990 XFX
      • PSU:
      • 750W
      • Operating System:
      • Linux Mint / Win 8.1
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x 22" Belinea, 1 x 22" Samsung, 5040x1050
      • Internet:
      • 200Mb Virgin + 20Mb BT

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    Like most people, I think 16 cores is completely no use to me, but do I want it? Absolutely!
    The core count of the 3950X CPU is what I've been waiting for to replace my aging (and recently performance reduced) 4770k

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,952
    Thanks
    400
    Thanked
    366 times in 255 posts

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    Not that it matters much but i thought the I/O die was going to use 14nm, not the 12nm mentioned in the article, did AMD confirm 12nm for the I/O die?

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    125
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    5 times in 4 posts

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    Yes, Anandtech confirmed that it is indeed 12nm.

  5. Received thanks from:

    Corky34 (11-06-2019)

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    369
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    23 times in 17 posts
    • Bagpuss's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Pro Wi-Fi
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9-9900K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4 3400
      • Storage:
      • Gigabyte 512GB NVMe SSD, Crucial 1Tb NVMe SSD, 6Tb Seagate 7200
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 2080 Black Edition
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 850 RMx 850 Gold
      • Case:
      • Fractal Meshify C Copper Front Panel
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG UK850 27in 4K HDR Freesync/Gsync
      • Internet:
      • Three Mobile 4G Unlimited Data (35-45Mbit)

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    "Of course, Intel may well change its pricing stack in the wake of AMD's new threat"


    Intel, Price cuts? Haha!! hell will freeze over before they'd stoop so low as to price cut because of anything AMD comes up with.

    Their corporate culture will simply not allow it. They'd rather take the market share hit until they're ready next year with a response.

  7. #6
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    10,119
    Thanks
    505
    Thanked
    1,044 times in 888 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 30 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by Bagpuss View Post
    Their corporate culture will simply not allow it. They'd rather take the market share hit until they're ready next year with a response.
    Whilst I don't think they will have a response as early as next year (10nm sucks for clock speeds so they are stuck with enhanced 14nm until their 7nm comes out) I agree they probably won't budge on price. After all, people kept buying the Pentium 4 and that was a piece of junk whereas what Intel are selling now is OK silicon, just might not be as good as AMDs in some circumstances. So corporate types will keep buying Intel chips in huge quantity.

    What I will watch with interest is how the Dell product mix changes. They got labelled "the best friends money can buy" in past litigation, I can't imagine they want that label plastered on them again but just how much cash will Intel offer to keep them selling key products as Intel only.

  8. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,952
    Thanks
    400
    Thanked
    366 times in 255 posts

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    Am i the only one who thinks the 3800X seems rather poor value from a gaming perspective?

  9. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    299
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked
    13 times in 12 posts
    • PC-LAD's system
      • Motherboard:
      • X370 GT7
      • CPU:
      • R5 3600 @ 5.3GHz
      • Memory:
      • 4*4 GB TG Delta @2666. Apparently a matching kit wont let me reach 2933
      • Storage:
      • 128gb Sandisk SSD plus, 1tb SeaGate Barracuda, 640GB WD Black, 500gb WD Blue sata ssd
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Lovely RX 570
      • PSU:
      • Evga G+650w
      • Case:
      • MasterBox 5 Lite TemG
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • MSI Optix G24C
      • Internet:
      • 10 up 35 down :(

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by Corky34 View Post
    Am i the only one who thinks the 3800X seems rather poor value from a gaming perspective?
    I agree with you in every regard, if you are gaming on the high end the GPU matters more than the CPU thanks the higher workload on that end. No point in putting money into something that won't be utilized properly. the r5 series is most likely to dominate again. I think I might wait to see if they bring out a 4 core 8 thread again (w// no igpu) but idk?

  10. #9
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    10,119
    Thanks
    505
    Thanked
    1,044 times in 888 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 30 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by Corky34 View Post
    Am i the only one who thinks the 3800X seems rather poor value from a gaming perspective?
    It is steep. I'm sure I could buy one, but not sure I want to at that price, will have to wait for Phoronix to get their hands on one and see how fast it can churn through Linux code compiles. The 3600X is the sensible option for me, but I might stretch to the 3700X.

    Actually, the sensible option was always the 2600X which monstered everything I threw at it and is currently about £170 on Amazon, but where is the fun in that

    Edit: I gather Zen2 has some countermeasures to the speculative execution problems, will be nice to see some stuff like retpoline turned off.

  11. #10
    Senior Member kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    29,196
    Thanks
    1,520
    Thanked
    2,933 times in 2,376 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte X58A UD3R rev 2
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon X5680
      • Memory:
      • 12gb DDR3 2000
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H
      • Internet:
      • O2 8mbps

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    The picture I take from that is that gaming is often not bottlenecked by CPU, though interestingly minor differences across architecture remain at different price points, even though the chip might be slower or faster in the range.

  12. #11
    Long member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,458
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked
    255 times in 184 posts
    • philehidiot's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Father's bored
      • CPU:
      • Cockroach brain V0.1
      • Memory:
      • Innebriated, unwritten
      • Storage:
      • Big Yellow Self Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Semi chewed Crayola Mega Pack
      • PSU:
      • 20KW single phase direct grid supply
      • Case:
      • Closed, Open, Cold
      • Operating System:
      • Cockroach
      • Monitor(s):
      • The mental health nurses
      • Internet:
      • Please.

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by 00oceanic View Post
    Like most people, I think 16 cores is completely no use to me, but do I want it? Absolutely!
    The core count of the 3950X CPU is what I've been waiting for to replace my aging (and recently performance reduced) 4770k
    Aye, I've noticed my 4690K has been playing up recently to the point where I've applied my end of life extending overclock (I buy an overclockable chip with mobo and cooling and then overclock when it begins to bottleneck. This is usually when a new game comes out but I think it's due to the security patches this time as the games haven't changed but the performance has dropped substantially).

    Don't get me started on companies buying the P4 when the Althon64 was available and relatively awesome. Utter madness. Way more up front cost, way more electricity and much lower performance. Also, likely shorter longevity due to the running temps and the higher demands on PSU and power delivery system. I had a desktop P4 in a laptop. Cooked itself.

  13. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,379
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked
    68 times in 60 posts

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by philehidiot View Post
    I think it's due to the security patches this time as the games haven't changed but the performance has dropped substantially)
    More than likely, I've seen a 'noticeable' decrease with these security patches and as such have been looking to bring forward my update for my 4790k.... on some sites it's saying the combined performance loss is around 16% on newer generation cpu's which according to intel aren't as badly affected as our generation.

  14. #13
    Banned - repeated insults to other members
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    146
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    4 times in 3 posts

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    “Of course, Intel may well change its pricing stack in the wake of AMD's new threat”

    A few have commented on this, but I'll add to it. Reducing pricing has a direct effect on gross margins, which is a measure of the profit margins per dollar of sales. Intel's share price has always been propped up by its monopolistic or near monopolistic status which allowed it to maintain very high historical margins.

    The stock market looks very closely at that gross margin metric. The moment there is a price war, the share price will tank sharply due to the gross margin deterioration. Therefore Intel will be loathe to engage in a straight price war, especially on its latest products (9th & 10th gen crap).

    At the same time, if they do not cut price, market share will take a hit. However, this metric is less of a headline metric in the quarterly earnings announcements. Less of a knee jerk reaction to share prices.

    However, in Germany and some other countries already, reports are showing AMD outselling Intel by more than 2 to 1. Despite the unit sales disparity, so far the sales dollars taken in is about the same for both due to the higher Intel prices.

    But given that AMD's lead in price-performance ratio is continuing to widen, that will change very soon. When total volume and total sales revenue drops, Intel will be caught with its panties down and the shares will eventually tank one way or another too.

    Truth be told, Intel is in a world of hurt whichever path of least hurt it chooses. The recent trend showing declines in Intel share prices (and conversely the rocketing AMD share price) says it all and is poised to continue with greater velocity until Intel gets its act together on 10nm and 7nm. That seems to be a few years away still!

  15. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    289
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    9 times in 8 posts

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    I was thinking of going for a Ryzen 7 originally, but now I'm starting to consider a Ryzen 5. Will definitely need to await for proper benchmarks to come first.

  16. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,952
    Thanks
    400
    Thanked
    366 times in 255 posts

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by yeeeeman View Post
    Yes, Anandtech confirmed that it is indeed 12nm.
    Just to add to this, it seems (Ian Cutress tweet) we're both right:
    So for clarity: Rome large IO die = GF 14nm Matisse small IO die = GF 12nm X570 Chipset = Matisse IO die on GF 14nm That's right. The X570 chipset is the same floorplan as the Matisse IO die, but with diff chicken bits enabled/disabled. AMD has good reuse of chips
    That wasn't very clear for me at first but what he's essentially saying is that EPYC uses an I/O die fabricated on 14nm, Ryzen I/O die uses 12nm, and the X570 chipset is actually the I/O die from EPYC, at least i think that's what he's saying, other interpretations are welcomed.

  17. Received thanks from:

    DanceswithUnix (12-06-2019)

  18. #16
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    10,119
    Thanks
    505
    Thanked
    1,044 times in 888 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 30 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: The architecture behind AMD's Zen 2 and Ryzen 3000 CPUs

    Quote Originally Posted by Corky34 View Post
    , and the X570 chipset is actually the I/O die from EPYC, at least i think that's what he's saying, other interpretations are welcomed.
    If that's true... well I wasn't expecting that

    That implies there are wasted memory controllers on the X570 chipset (meh), and more interestingly there are lots of chipset bits already in the CPU. I presume there will be a laptop version that brings those functions out to avoid needing a chipset and save cost and space.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •