Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Amazon asks FCC permission to launch 3,236 comms satellites

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    29,053
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,868 times in 641 posts

    Amazon asks FCC permission to launch 3,236 comms satellites

    4th July filing to the FCC outlines plans to use satellites to deliver broadband to millions.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    128
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts

    Re: Amazon asks FCC permission to launch 3,236 comms satellites

    hmmm thought elon musk was going to do that too, via spacex called starlink

  3. #3
    HEXUS.timelord. Zak33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I'm a Jessie
    Posts
    34,458
    Thanks
    2,732
    Thanked
    2,827 times in 1,737 posts
    • Zak33's system
      • Storage:
      • Kingston HyperX SSD, Hitachi 1Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 1060
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 800w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT01
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTC uber speedy

    Re: Amazon asks FCC permission to launch 3,236 comms satellites

    Quote Originally Posted by hellig View Post
    hmmm thought elon musk was going to do that too, via spacex called starlink
    The FCC already has 13,000 low-Earth orbit satellite approvals under its belt (nearly 12,000 of which are for Elon Musk’s Space Exploration Technologies Corp).
    he is

    Quote Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
    "The second you aren't paying attention to the tool you're using, it will take your fingers from you. It does not know sympathy." |
    "If you don't gaffer it, it will gaffer you" | "Belt and braces"

  4. #4
    Long member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,471
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked
    257 times in 185 posts
    • philehidiot's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Father's bored
      • CPU:
      • Cockroach brain V0.1
      • Memory:
      • Innebriated, unwritten
      • Storage:
      • Big Yellow Self Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Semi chewed Crayola Mega Pack
      • PSU:
      • 20KW single phase direct grid supply
      • Case:
      • Closed, Open, Cold
      • Operating System:
      • Cockroach
      • Monitor(s):
      • The mental health nurses
      • Internet:
      • Please.

    Re: Amazon asks FCC permission to launch 3,236 comms satellites

    Hmm, satellites already get in the way of my telescoping activities as it is. We're talking about an existing 1000 or so in low orbit (which you can already see frequently at a dark sky observatory - spend a couple of hours there and you'll see a handful easily without going looking) going to ~15,000. As if light pollution wasn't enough.

    Grump grump.

  5. Received thanks from:

    blueball (09-07-2019)

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    561
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked
    75 times in 53 posts
    • adidan's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-M
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 3770
      • Memory:
      • 16Gb Mushkin
      • Storage:
      • 2x240Gb HyperX Savage / 2x525Gb Crucial MX300
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Zotac GTX1080 Mini
      • PSU:
      • 750W EVGA G3
      • Case:
      • Antec ISK-600M
      • Operating System:
      • W7 64 Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 27" 1440p Iiyama XUB2792QSU

    Re: Amazon asks FCC permission to launch 3,236 comms satellites

    It's no grump, perfectly valid.

    AFAIK the Astronomy world is concerned it'll bugger up optical and near infrared observations, let alone what it'll do to radio wave detection and just, you know, just looking up at the stars.

    I know Musk says all astronomy will go offworld but it"s not yet.
    Grab that. Get that. Check it out. Bring that here. Grab anything useful. Take anything good.

  7. #6
    Hexus.Jet TeePee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Gallup, NM
    Posts
    4,952
    Thanks
    117
    Thanked
    617 times in 350 posts

    Re: Amazon asks FCC permission to launch 3,236 comms satellites

    Kessler Syndrome is one suggested solution that the Fermi Paradox.... Just saying...

  8. #7
    Bagnaj97
    Guest

    Re: Amazon asks FCC permission to launch 3,236 comms satellites

    Quote Originally Posted by philehidiot View Post
    Hmm, satellites already get in the way of my telescoping activities as it is. We're talking about an existing 1000 or so in low orbit (which you can already see frequently at a dark sky observatory - spend a couple of hours there and you'll see a handful easily without going looking) going to ~15,000. As if light pollution wasn't enough.

    Grump grump.
    I'm not overly concerned about telescoping activities - if you're doing visual astronomy any satellites will move out of the field of view very quickly, and shouldn't be bright enough to affect your dark adaptation. For astrophotography it's a bit more of a concern, but the usual processing and calibration frames should deal pretty effectively with satellite trails; I don't currently ditch subframes with satellite trails assuming the frame is otherwise ok. Now planes on the other hand... they make a right mess of things and having a 5+ minute exposure ruined is a bit galling.


    Quote Originally Posted by TeePee View Post
    Kessler Syndrome is one suggested solution that the Fermi Paradox.... Just saying...
    These proposed satellite networks are in a low orbit and without station keeping their orbits decay fairly quickly due to atmospheric drag. SpaceX have lowered the orbit for some Starlink satellites and in theory any malfunctioning satellites that can no longer be properly de-orbited will burn up within 5 years.

  9. #8
    Long member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,471
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked
    257 times in 185 posts
    • philehidiot's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Father's bored
      • CPU:
      • Cockroach brain V0.1
      • Memory:
      • Innebriated, unwritten
      • Storage:
      • Big Yellow Self Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Semi chewed Crayola Mega Pack
      • PSU:
      • 20KW single phase direct grid supply
      • Case:
      • Closed, Open, Cold
      • Operating System:
      • Cockroach
      • Monitor(s):
      • The mental health nurses
      • Internet:
      • Please.

    Re: Amazon asks FCC permission to launch 3,236 comms satellites

    Quote Originally Posted by Bagnaj97 View Post
    I'm not overly concerned about telescoping activities - if you're doing visual astronomy any satellites will move out of the field of view very quickly, and shouldn't be bright enough to affect your dark adaptation. For astrophotography it's a bit more of a concern, but the usual processing and calibration frames should deal pretty effectively with satellite trails; I don't currently ditch subframes with satellite trails assuming the frame is otherwise ok. Now planes on the other hand... they make a right mess of things and having a 5+ minute exposure ruined is a bit galling.
    I'm hoping to upgrade my telescope with a tracker and do some long exposure astrophotography. To be honest this has made me rethink. The observatory I usually visit has just built a great big new astrophotography bit and the stuff that has come out of it is insane. I'm going there next week actually so I might ask what they think. I suspect they'll be suitably unimpressed.

    EDIT: Also, Mr Musk may have the money to send up his own telescope but if you talk to people in the business they usually got into it as a kid with back garden kit and that inspired them. Or they went to an observatory and saw what they were churning out. If you cover the planet in little satellites and make home / ground based astronomy really limited, you're going to vastly reduce the number of people going into the field.
    Last edited by philehidiot; 09-07-2019 at 11:57 AM. Reason: More ranting.

  10. #9
    Bagnaj97
    Guest

    Re: Amazon asks FCC permission to launch 3,236 comms satellites

    Quote Originally Posted by philehidiot View Post
    I'm hoping to upgrade my telescope with a tracker and do some long exposure astrophotography. To be honest this has made me rethink. The observatory I usually visit has just built a great big new astrophotography bit and the stuff that has come out of it is insane. I'm going there next week actually so I might ask what they think. I suspect they'll be suitably unimpressed.
    It does depend on what sort of astrophotography you're trying to achieve - if you're doing a single longish exposure, e.g. landscape under the milky way then a satellite trail could ruin it. Or a straight line across a photo of star trails.

    For tracked deep-sky AP then typically you take multiple exposures (sub-frames), align them to correct any tracking errors/rotation and then average them to reduce the effects of noise/atmospheric distortion/telescope vibration etc. With the right software there are algorithms that can reject outlier pixels, so if the pixel at a set X,Y coordinate was some shade of dark grey in most of your subframes, but very light due to satellite pass in one of them, it can reject the satellite-affected pixel and average the remaining ones.
    https://pixinsight.com/doc/tools/Ima...escription_003

    So if you're planning to upgrade and get into AP, no need to rethink!

  11. #10
    Long member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,471
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked
    257 times in 185 posts
    • philehidiot's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Father's bored
      • CPU:
      • Cockroach brain V0.1
      • Memory:
      • Innebriated, unwritten
      • Storage:
      • Big Yellow Self Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Semi chewed Crayola Mega Pack
      • PSU:
      • 20KW single phase direct grid supply
      • Case:
      • Closed, Open, Cold
      • Operating System:
      • Cockroach
      • Monitor(s):
      • The mental health nurses
      • Internet:
      • Please.

    Re: Amazon asks FCC permission to launch 3,236 comms satellites

    Quote Originally Posted by Bagnaj97 View Post
    It does depend on what sort of astrophotography you're trying to achieve - if you're doing a single longish exposure, e.g. landscape under the milky way then a satellite trail could ruin it. Or a straight line across a photo of star trails.

    For tracked deep-sky AP then typically you take multiple exposures (sub-frames), align them to correct any tracking errors/rotation and then average them to reduce the effects of noise/atmospheric distortion/telescope vibration etc. With the right software there are algorithms that can reject outlier pixels, so if the pixel at a set X,Y coordinate was some shade of dark grey in most of your subframes, but very light due to satellite pass in one of them, it can reject the satellite-affected pixel and average the remaining ones.
    https://pixinsight.com/doc/tools/Ima...escription_003

    So if you're planning to upgrade and get into AP, no need to rethink!
    Aye I was considering deep sky stuff but hadn't looked into it beyond knowing what kit I need and the cost of that. I didn't consider the software behind putting the pics togther and really just was thinking you just set the camera to a long exposure and that's that. Sounds like once I've been made poor with other things, I need to do a lot of reading into how this is gonna work. To be frank, this whole wedding business has taken up a lot of time and once it's out of the way I'll have far more time to actually consider things properly...

    At the moment my money is going elsewhere so any astrophotography stuff is gonna have to wait.

  12. #11
    Bagnaj97
    Guest

    Re: Amazon asks FCC permission to launch 3,236 comms satellites

    Quote Originally Posted by philehidiot View Post
    Aye I was considering deep sky stuff but hadn't looked into it beyond knowing what kit I need and the cost of that. I didn't consider the software behind putting the pics togther and really just was thinking you just set the camera to a long exposure and that's that. Sounds like once I've been made poor with other things, I need to do a lot of reading into how this is gonna work. To be frank, this whole wedding business has taken up a lot of time and once it's out of the way I'll have far more time to actually consider things properly...

    At the moment my money is going elsewhere so any astrophotography stuff is gonna have to wait.
    The software doesn't have to be expensive thankfully. You can stack the frames using Deep Sky Stacker (free), and it supports various algorithms which will deal with satellite trails. It spits out a .tiff which you can then process using Gimp etc.
    As for camera control, there are free solutions but I'm a fan of BackyardEOS (Or BackyardNikon for D5x00 and up cameras), which isn't free but isn't terribly expensive.

    The hardware is what's really going to lighten your wallet!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •