Read more.Quote:
It is about 8 per cent faster than the RTX 2080, and is neck and neck with the Titan V.
Printable View
Read more.Quote:
It is about 8 per cent faster than the RTX 2080, and is neck and neck with the Titan V.
So in a game that is heavily optimised for nvidia cards the super version goes faster than the non super version it replaces....
I think I'd be more shocked if it didn't get any gain...
https://i.ibb.co/54PGG7x/hmmmm.png
Gigabyte Aorus xtreme 2080, running a clock of 1950, that is the factory boost for this card, a manual OC would probably bring it even higher.
Anyone else think NVidia alread yahd this in the works, but was holding out for another round in the price/performance battle with AMD, and this is in response to the rumors that when properly cooled, the 5700XT can be clocked to have performance similar to the 2080?
Sorry, was there any other reason?Quote:
Originally Posted by globalwarning
Honestly there is so much variability for the benchmark that it doesn't really reflect any form of accuracy. We have no indication of the system used in the benchmark, nor do we know if they've used stock settings. Case in point the benchmark results you've posted use a factory boost with an overclocked cpu, below is an example using a stock clocked cpu and the founders edition 2080, both of which are at least 4% faster than the 2080 results shown in the graph.Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilCycle
https://imgur.com/9qq4PtT
https://imgur.com/x6L81he
Media (Hexus included) really needs to stop talking about that FFXV bench. It sucks. It's more marketing than benchmarking.