AMD intros Radeon RX 5500 series, based upon the 7nm Navi 14 GPU

Quote:

---

Available from next month, the new GPUs are coming to desktop and laptop (M) PCs.

---

Read more.

I want the 5800 or 5900 series to be released

Like Mojo, I do too. AMDs Navi die sizes are a gnats pubic hair in mm^2 compared to the colossal die sizes Nvidia are using. Potentially a lot of moxious potential there if they compete on die size.

But, I reallllly like the look of that 5500M, that and that all AMD Gigabyte laptop, really looking forward to that review to see how it stacks up.

150W typical:
https://www.amd.com/en/products/grap...radeon-rx-5500

So 570 performance in the same power budget, eyeballing the difference between the 1650 and 570. That's a hard market to enter, at least until the 570 stock dries up

This will go for £120 before too long and I can't rubbishrubbishrubbishrubbishing wait

Not really 570 performance if it is 12% faster than the 480 as AMD claim. More like 590 performance for 570 power consumption.

I found out yesterday that my computer with a 5700 XT in it, well i cant play and then record it at the same time, the resulting video are laggy every few seconds.
AND ! i have 12 cores on my 1920X - 32 Gb RAM - and the 5700XT feeding a 1080p screen.

Dont even work with the microsoft stuff either.
Guess you need other hardware beside what i have to pull that off.

SO why do they provide these options ( AMD in the driver software ) and Microsoft in their OS, when you need a ultimate uber computer to pull it off ( well i assume you have to do that )

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jamz4

Not really 570 performance if it is 12% faster than the 480 as AMD claim. More like 590 performance for 570 power consumption.

---

The 590 is 22% ahead of the 480 on FLOPS, so it's a steep ask to catch. Where do AMD compare the 5500 to the 480?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Xlucine

The 590 is 22% ahead of the 480 on FLOPS, so it's a steep ask to catch. Where do AMD compare the 5500 to the 480?

---

Mate it is literally the second image in the article. The 480 is shown below the 5500 as it's a bit lower in frame rate output.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dcwt2010

Mate it is literally the second image in the article. The 480 is shown below the 5500 as it's a bit lower in frame rate output.

---

Fair, I was looking for the percentage