Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 18

Thread: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    EMF measurements at 16 locations in 10 cities across the UK were tiny fractions of safe limits.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    "Ofcom's recent research will probably butter no parsnips for a certain crowd" This sentence is outstanding and sublime.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    11,926
    Thanks
    845
    Thanked
    529 times in 367 posts

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    Mmmmm buttered parsnips, have to do them in the oven though as there just isn't enough microwaves in the air to do the job...

    Wonder if we'll be able to use the microwaves from 10G to power cars in the future, as long as we're all wearing tinfoil hats so it doesn't fry our brains first...

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    278
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked
    28 times in 19 posts

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    ""the contribution of 5G to the total emissions level observed is currently low" Very reassuring, since there is vitually no 5g coverage in the UK as yet. There's also the fact that 5g requires many, many more base stations than 4g does.
    Thank god i live in the sticks...

  5. #5
    MCRN Tachi Ttaskmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    6,852
    Thanks
    577
    Thanked
    782 times in 655 posts
    • Ttaskmaster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X99-PRO USB 3.1
      • CPU:
      • i7 5960X o/c to 4.6GHz
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer RGB DDR4
      • Storage:
      • Samsung Evo 120GB and Seagate Baracuda 2TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte G1 GTX980Ti
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 1000W
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Luxe wiv perspex window
      • Operating System:
      • Win10 64 Home
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator XB270HU 1440 IPS GSync 144Hz
      • Internet:
      • 900Mbps Gigaclear WHOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    Quote Originally Posted by [GSV]Trig View Post
    Mmmmm buttered parsnips, have to do them in the oven though as there just isn't enough microwaves in the air to do the job...
    I'll see your buttered parsnips, and raise you honey-roasted parsnips!!

    Another sticks dweller here, so not worried about frying my brain along with my bacon... at least until they bulldoze our paradise to make way for another housing estate, with 5G antennae everywhere.
    _______________________________________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Tyson
    like a chihuahua urinating on a towering inferno...

  6. #6
    boop, got your nose stevie lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    southport
    Posts
    2,685
    Thanks
    419
    Thanked
    439 times in 325 posts
    • stevie lee's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS ROG STRIX B450-F Gaming
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 3600
      • Memory:
      • 16 GB Corsair 3600 MHZ Cas 18
      • Storage:
      • 250GB BX500, M500 240GB, SN750 1TB NVME, mechs - Hitachi 1TB. WDblue 2TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • sapphire 7700 1gb
      • PSU:
      • corsair RM550X
      • Case:
      • Xigmatech Midgard
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Home
      • Monitor(s):
      • 42" Panasonix viera (1080p limited RGB)
      • Internet:
      • plusnet fibre

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    wonder if they note what manufacturer the 5g mast was, is hauwei less EMeffy that the others?

    and how many people were using the 5g when they measured. the levels may get higher the more people are connected.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    100
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    10 times in 9 posts

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    Quote Originally Posted by ohmaheid View Post
    ""the contribution of 5G to the total emissions level observed is currently low" Very reassuring, since there is vitually no 5g coverage in the UK as yet. There's also the fact that 5g requires many, many more base stations than 4g does.
    Thank god i live in the sticks...
    Except they were taking these measurements near the towers. Signal strength diminishes by at least the inverse square of the distance, so if the signal is weak when you are next to one tower it's not going to be much stronger if there are a few more towers further away. You get problems even 'hearing' a weak signal far away if there is a strong one closer. Its called the near far problem and one of the reasons 5g has more towers is to have have more weaker towers nearby do they don't have to have a few powerful towers that would have too high strength next to them and still have poor signal further away.

    As ever when it comes to complex infrastructure, if as a layman you instantly understood a potential problem you can rest assured that the experts who build them were also able to recognise that issue. No one responds to being told they need surgery by explaining to the surgeon what the problem with cutting into a conscious person is, they already know and have a solution. I work in the smart meter sector and have the same thing: if my bill goes over the air people could read it... Never heard of e2e encryption clearly!

  8. Received thanks from:

    chinf (25-02-2020),nichomach (26-02-2020)

  9. #8
    Now 100% Apple free cheesemp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Near the New forest
    Posts
    2,935
    Thanks
    351
    Thanked
    243 times in 167 posts
    • cheesemp's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS TUF x570-plus
      • CPU:
      • Ryzen 3600
      • Memory:
      • 16gb Corsair RGB ram
      • Storage:
      • 256Gb NVMe + 500Gb TcSunbow SDD (cheap for games only)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • RX 480 8Gb Nitro+ OC (with auto OC to above 580 speeds!)
      • PSU:
      • Cooler Master MWE 750 bronze
      • Case:
      • Gamemax f15m
      • Operating System:
      • Win 11
      • Monitor(s):
      • 32" QHD AOC Q3279VWF
      • Internet:
      • FTTC ~35Mb

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    Its depressing this needs to be said. I swear everyone thinks they can read any old garbage on the internet and suddenly they are an expert. People used to believe going more than 10 Mph meant you couldn't breath!

    Back on the subject I'm still waiting for a decent 4G signal in my small town - I'm happy for you to install 5G in my area!
    Trust

    Laptop : Dell Inspiron 1545 with Ryzen 5500u, 16gb and 256 NVMe, Windows 11.

  10. #9
    MCRN Tachi Ttaskmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Reading, UK
    Posts
    6,852
    Thanks
    577
    Thanked
    782 times in 655 posts
    • Ttaskmaster's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X99-PRO USB 3.1
      • CPU:
      • i7 5960X o/c to 4.6GHz
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer RGB DDR4
      • Storage:
      • Samsung Evo 120GB and Seagate Baracuda 2TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte G1 GTX980Ti
      • PSU:
      • EVGA Supernova G2 1000W
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Luxe wiv perspex window
      • Operating System:
      • Win10 64 Home
      • Monitor(s):
      • Acer Predator XB270HU 1440 IPS GSync 144Hz
      • Internet:
      • 900Mbps Gigaclear WHOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    Quote Originally Posted by stevie lee View Post
    is hauwei less EMeffy that the others?
    You mean are they less... Unbelievable?

    _______________________________________________________________________
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Tyson
    like a chihuahua urinating on a towering inferno...

  11. Received thanks from:

    chinf (25-02-2020),nichomach (26-02-2020)

  12. #10
    HEXUS.Squirrel Output's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,145
    Thanks
    949
    Thanked
    368 times in 277 posts
    • Output's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte AORUS Master X570
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 Corsair Vengeance Platinum @ 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • Sandisk Ultra 3D 2TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte RX Vega 56 Gaming OC 8GB
      • PSU:
      • EVGA SuperNOVA 750 G3
      • Case:
      • bequiet Dark Base Pro 900 Rev.2
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Dell P2214H

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    Quote Originally Posted by tunrip View Post
    "Ofcom's recent research will probably butter no parsnips for a certain crowd" This sentence is outstanding and sublime.
    I completely agree.

    I have to wonder though if there was a challenge made in the HEXUS offices to see if mentioning buttered parsnips could be inserted into the story in a way that makes sense.

    Either way, I welcome other such lines as it enjoyably spices up the article as a whole.

  13. #11
    HEXUS.timelord. Zak33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I'm a Jessie
    Posts
    35,172
    Thanks
    3,120
    Thanked
    3,160 times in 1,920 posts
    • Zak33's system
      • Storage:
      • Kingston HyperX SSD, Hitachi 1Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 1050
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 800w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT01
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTC uber speedy

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    Quote Originally Posted by Output View Post
    I completely agree.

    I have to wonder though if there was a challenge made in the HEXUS offices to see if mentioning buttered parsnips could be inserted into the story in a way that makes sense.

    Either way, I welcome other such lines as it enjoyably spices up the article as a whole.
    lost my £1

    Quote Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
    "The second you aren't paying attention to the tool you're using, it will take your fingers from you. It does not know sympathy." |
    "If you don't gaffer it, it will gaffer you" | "Belt and braces"

  14. Received thanks from:

    Output (26-02-2020)

  15. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,882
    Thanks
    167
    Thanked
    366 times in 295 posts
    • badass's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P8Z77-m pro
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 3570K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 850 EVO, 2TB WD Green
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon RX 580
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX520W
      • Case:
      • Silverstone SG02-F
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 X64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Del U2311, LG226WTQ
      • Internet:
      • 80/20 FTTC

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    Quote Originally Posted by ohmaheid View Post
    ""the contribution of 5G to the total emissions level observed is currently low" Very reassuring, since there is vitually no 5g coverage in the UK as yet. There's also the fact that 5g requires many, many more base stations than 4g does.
    Thank god i live in the sticks...
    Your Parsnips are clearly not buttered.
    "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship."

  16. #13
    Hellsteeth! Lord Midas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Amazingstoke
    Posts
    919
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked
    18 times in 17 posts
    • Lord Midas's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
      • CPU:
      • Intel i7 9700k w/ Corsair H100i Hydro PRO RGB Liquid CPU Cooler
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3200 8GB x 2
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970 Evo NVMe M.2 + 2TB Intel 660p NVMe M.2
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus RTX 2080 TURBO 8GB
      • PSU:
      • Corsair RM750x
      • Case:
      • Fractal Design Define R6
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG 34UM88 Ultrawide 34" - 3440x1440
      • Internet:
      • Virgin - Speakers: Pair of Adam T5V

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    This is like when mobile phones first came out. Having a mobile phone in your pocket would make you sterile and your bollocks would get cancer and fall off.
    Kickstarters Pledged:
    Godus Stonehearth Rain World Satellite Reign


  17. #14
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,672
    Thanks
    747
    Thanked
    1,498 times in 1,263 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Linux, 2TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 35 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    I can't see why the EMF would be a problem, but...

    From the number of mobile phone zombies I see zerging erratically along the paths whilst staring at the latest kitten video on their smartphone I sometimes wonder if dropping back to 2G might force people to actually look where they are going and could prevent accidents.

    Although if the phone was capable of informing the user that they are wandering onto a road or cycle path I suppose that would help. If it could also tell them to choose a bleeding side of the path and stick to it so other pedestrians can get past, preferably adding that flailing their arms around in animated conversation in a crowded area isn't making them friends either.

  18. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    226
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked
    40 times in 31 posts
    • atemporal's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell ownbrand
      • CPU:
      • i5-2500
      • Memory:
      • 4GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 160GB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • you're kidding right?
      • PSU:
      • 300W OEM Dell
      • Case:
      • Dell Optiplex 990
      • Operating System:
      • windows 7
      • Monitor(s):
      • Some small 17" dell thing
      • Internet:
      • yes I has the internet

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Midas View Post
    This is like when mobile phones first came out. Having a mobile phone in your pocket would make you sterile and your bollocks would get cancer and fall off.
    so that's why we can't have children. FFS. Bloody phones. Who do I sue?

  19. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    186
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    11 times in 10 posts

    Re: Ofcom says that UK 5G network isn't harmful to health

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    I can't see why the EMF would be a problem, but...

    From the number of mobile phone zombies I see zerging erratically along the paths whilst staring at the latest kitten video on their smartphone I sometimes wonder if dropping back to 2G might force people to actually look where they are going and could prevent accidents.

    Although if the phone was capable of informing the user that they are wandering onto a road or cycle path I suppose that would help. If it could also tell them to choose a bleeding side of the path and stick to it so other pedestrians can get past, preferably adding that flailing their arms around in animated conversation in a crowded area isn't making them friends either.
    It isn't, but someone always has to be a scaremonger.
    Why let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy.
    These things only ever need one person to declare something being true for other people to listen, and repeat it.
    Evidence never required, yet it will be defended so strongly as if there were plenty.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •