Intel Core i9-10999K doubles current-gen performance

[HEXUS]

Comet Lake pulls out the stops. Trounces the mainstream competition, allegedly.

Read more.

[Terbinator]

[darcotech]

It is 1st April after all. :-)

[3dcandy]

It would also be a 300+ watt part if it's true

[lumireleon]

that graph is an exclusive Hexus labs benchmark. How did you manage to test a rumour? rumour core benchmark?

[3dcandy]

that graph is an exclusive Hexus labs benchmark. How did you manage to test a rumour? rumour core benchmark?

RumourCore V20 I believe

[Hugis]

Lirpa - april

[Tarinder]

that graph is an exclusive Hexus labs benchmark. How did you manage to test a rumour? rumour core benchmark?

[sykobee]

You got a scalp - https://www.fudzilla.com/news/pc-har...en-performance

[DK2019]

This is too mean it gives the intel fanboys hope lol

[LSG501]

I'll believe it when I see it... it's too 'linear' an increase from the 8/16 core, would have been more believable if it wasn't imo

[FRISH]

If you right click on the image and open in new tab, it says april fools in the url :3 :3

[tygrus]

400w or more if still using Intel 14nm. Same price you can use 32 core AMD to beat the multithread performance and uses less power.

[will19565]

I'll believe it when I see it... it's too 'linear' an increase from the 8/16 core, would have been more believable if it wasn't imo

It's a core X vs K
A massive increase in TDP, an i7-9800X, 8c16t, has a TDP of 165W, an i9-9900k has a TPD of 95W, and in cinebench R20, a 9800x is nearly as fast as a 9900k, despite being a bit behind in clocks.

[LSG501]

It's a core X vs K
A massive increase in TDP, an i7-9800X, 8c16t, has a TDP of 165W, an i9-9900k has a TPD of 95W, and in cinebench R20, a 9800x is nearly as fast as a 9900k, despite being a bit behind in clocks.

and it's April

[QuorTek]

doubt it, Intel is too far behind for that move.