Read more.Quote:
As it publishes its Q1 2020 financials - with revenue up 23 per cent, EPS up 51 per cent YoY.
Printable View
Read more.Quote:
As it publishes its Q1 2020 financials - with revenue up 23 per cent, EPS up 51 per cent YoY.
Wait, so we have Rocket Lake, Comet Lake, Ice Lake and Tiger Lake CPUs this year?
I'm struggling to keep up with how much Intel is trying to saturate both the media and mindshare with their brand name.
*rubs temples*
Could someone please post a list of Intel's processor part numbers, and their equivalent 'friendly names'. It's getting beyond ridiculous now.
All I need to know is will Intel be able to match AMD, on a core-for-core basis, at the same price point?
if not... the rest is fluff.
Simply nope - unless overclocked and with about double the power consumptionQuote:
Originally Posted by simonpreston
Oh look another factory overclocked version of the same cpu..... still see no reason to pick anything other than AMD...
The figures for the PC segment looks surprising on first glance - but keep in mind that they're skewed by all the pre-built Intel PCs that are sold by their partners.
The user-built PC scene is a very different story and the trends there will continue to nudge more and more OEMs towards offering a growing range of Ryzen options.
Tigerlake is not the same CPU overclocked. Basically it add another 10% IPC over Ice Lake which in turn is 10% higher IPC than Zen 2. So all in all, Tigerlake should be 15% higher IPC than Zen 2, which is a sizeable difference and it allows them to get the same performance as AMD with much lower frequencies, hence better efficiency. That is the theory at least.Quote:
Originally Posted by LSG501
No, but they don't have to match the core numbers. Tigerlake has 15% better IPC than Zen 2, so in other words Tigerlake with 4 cores can match a 6 core Renoir if frequencies are right.Quote:
Originally Posted by simonpreston
User built PCs is a market but it is extremely small compared to the numbers that OEMs shift. So in other words it is a false illusion that AMD is getting great traction, because it gets it only with enthusiats. The rest of the market, 90% is buying prebuilt systems.Quote:
Originally Posted by KultiVator
The names are getting weirder and weirder..Why tiger?
Doubt that very much - most if not all software would be better with 6 cores than 4. I'd be more worried that the efficiency power wise is nowhere near the same. I'm here with a 65-watt 8c/16t cpu on a £70 motherboard that cost me £150 new on offer. Tiger lake needs a new motherboard etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by yeeeemanNo, but they don't have to match the core numbers. Tigerlake has 15% better IPC than Zen 2, so in other words Tigerlake with 4 cores can match a 6 core Renoir if frequencies are right.Quote:
Originally Posted by simonpreston
They haven't changed the fundamental architecture from the previous chip, it's just been refined a bit more, so it is basically little more than a factory overclock to an existing chip because the refinements allow the core to be pushed a bit harder.Quote:
Originally Posted by yeeeeman
Leaks suggest IPC gains are 5-8% over icelake, the higher numbers you refer to include a faster clock speeds.
My god you come across as an intel fanboy with that comment....Quote:
Originally Posted by yeeeeman
ice lake server...10nm?
Yep. Only 10nm parts on the server side this year. All about the margins with their bad yields.Quote:
Originally Posted by lumireleon
lmao.Quote:
Originally Posted by yeeeeman
what is the product line... and uh do we need a different mother board to each one of the last bunch of Lake series too?!?!?!?