Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Intel Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 laptop benchmarks impress

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    30,077
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,940 times in 681 posts

    Intel Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 laptop benchmarks impress

    Geekbench result from new Lenovo laptop evidence of Intel's CPU and GPU progress.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Wonderful Warwick!
    Posts
    3,182
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    123 times in 105 posts

    Re: Intel Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 laptop benchmarks impress

    Different version of geekbench, higher clock speed, different version of Win 10....

    Seems a tad fishy to me
    Old puter - still good enuff till I save some pennies!

  3. #3
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    23
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Intel Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 laptop benchmarks impress

    True. Everything from intel is fake scores. Can't trust any of it. And don't want anything from intel before they can enter the competition again.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,679
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    80 times in 71 posts

    Re: Intel Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 laptop benchmarks impress

    It's geekbench.... which is now at v5 (although I wouldn't trust that much either) rather than the 2 different v4's being used here.

    Not to mention (missing in top image)...
    11th Gen Intel Core i7-1165G7 @ 2.80 GHz versus Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 1.50 GHz... I'd like to think a 2.8GHz cpu would beat a 1.5GHz cpu when based on pretty similar architecture.

    That clock difference would easily compensate for the difference in opencl performance between gpu's at that sort of level, even more so if it's got the 'AI' stuff added.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    179
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    5 times in 5 posts

    Re: Intel Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 laptop benchmarks impress

    Quote Originally Posted by SpeedyJDK View Post
    True. Everything from intel is fake scores. Can't trust any of it. And don't want anything from intel before they can enter the competition again.
    Exactly, always pulling scams.

    I will wait until consumers have access to them and trusted sources verify exactly what chips cab and can't do.

    I NEVER pay any attention to Intel propaganda.

  6. #6
    Long member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,896
    Thanks
    63
    Thanked
    325 times in 230 posts
    • philehidiot's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Father's bored
      • CPU:
      • Cockroach brain V0.1
      • Memory:
      • Innebriated, unwritten
      • Storage:
      • Big Yellow Self Storage
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Semi chewed Crayola Mega Pack
      • PSU:
      • 20KW single phase direct grid supply
      • Case:
      • Closed, Open, Cold
      • Operating System:
      • Cockroach
      • Monitor(s):
      • The mental health nurses
      • Internet:
      • Please.

    Re: Intel Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 laptop benchmarks impress

    AMD has been a little dodgy of late occasionally, too. I think it's a matter of they don't need to if Intel is being honest. But, if Intel boost their scores with trickery, then AMD feels they have to do the same. It's like the mobile SoC benchmarking stuff. If you don't do it, everyone else beats you, so you have to do it to the same extent they do.

    Myself, I don't trust any of this stuff. I may have missed it but the main thing here is TDP. If you compared an 8 core AMD chip which is restricted into a 15W envelope and compare it with an Intel chip that's 4 cores, 8 threads but in a 25W envelope, you may well see these results as the single core boost may well go higher. In my mind anyway.

    I wait until Anandtech has reviewed stuff before buying. It's that simple, and they have an excellent way of killing that "OOH MUST HAVE SHINY" thing with raw data. Lots of raw data. They often take time but there's a reason for that. The secondary advantage is that you get to buy later when it's cheaper.

  7. #7
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Intel Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 laptop benchmarks impress

    Quote Originally Posted by LSG501 View Post
    Not to mention (missing in top image)...
    11th Gen Intel Core i7-1165G7 @ 2.80 GHz versus Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 1.50 GHz... I'd like to think a 2.8GHz cpu would beat a 1.5GHz cpu when based on pretty similar architecture.
    You are making conclusions on wrong data. Read any review of the 1065G7 and it never runs at the base frequency. The Turbo frequency differences are far less between the two. The 1065G7 can Turbo to 3.9GHz in ST and 3.5GHz in MT.

    Not to mention Geekbench OpenCL results do not correlate into gaming or 3D.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    190
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    6 times in 5 posts

    Re: Intel Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 laptop benchmarks impress

    Quote Originally Posted by Yoyoyo69 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SpeedyJDK View Post
    True. Everything from intel is fake scores. Can't trust any of it. And don't want anything from intel before they can enter the competition again.
    Exactly, always pulling scams.

    I will wait until consumers have access to them and trusted sources verify exactly what chips cab and can't do.

    I NEVER pay any attention to Intel propaganda.
    I also never pay attention to 'leaked' AMD benchmarks either. its to easy for a company to 'leak' a piece of completely fake info.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,679
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked
    80 times in 71 posts

    Re: Intel Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 laptop benchmarks impress

    Quote Originally Posted by DavidC1 View Post
    You are making conclusions on wrong data. Read any review of the 1065G7 and it never runs at the base frequency. The Turbo frequency differences are far less between the two. The 1065G7 can Turbo to 3.9GHz in ST and 3.5GHz in MT.

    Not to mention Geekbench OpenCL results do not correlate into gaming or 3D.
    If you're going to try and correct someone at least quote their entire post.... I never even mentioned gaming and you even agree with what I was saying about there being a difference... even if it's not at exactly base (due to I assume decent cooling) there is still a difference in the frequencies. Also just because a review shows something as running as higher than base frequency doesn't mean the one a person buys or one used in another review will see the same results.

    I'll quote the bit you missed on purpose...

    That clock difference would easily compensate for the difference in opencl performance between gpu's at that sort of level, even more so if it's got the 'AI' stuff added.
    Last edited by LSG501; 06-07-2020 at 03:09 PM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Where you are not
    Posts
    758
    Thanks
    290
    Thanked
    58 times in 47 posts
    • Iota's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus Hero XI
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core i7 9700K
      • Memory:
      • CMD32GX4M2C3200C16
      • Storage:
      • 1 x 250GB / 1 x 1TB Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia RTX 2080 FE
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HXi 850
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-X500B
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2716DG
      • Internet:
      • 40Mbps SKY Fibre

    Re: Intel Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 laptop benchmarks impress

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    Different version of geekbench, higher clock speed, different version of Win 10....
    This nails it, if there is going to be any comparison it has to at the very least be using the same software versions.

  11. #11
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    California
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 2 posts
    • thewelshbrummie's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z87Deluxe/Dual
      • CPU:
      • i5-4670K
      • Memory:
      • 4x4GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • 2.5TB in SSDs, 24TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • GTX 970
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 650W
      • Case:
      • Antec 1200 V3
      • Operating System:
      • Win8.1/10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2410
      • Internet:
      • terrible BT fibre

    Re: Intel Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 laptop benchmarks impress

    Quote Originally Posted by SpeedyJDK View Post
    True. Everything from intel is fake scores. Can't trust any of it. And don't want anything from intel before they can enter the competition again.
    ...except Intel hasn't published these scores - they've simply been spotted on Geekbench.

    Obviously there's too many variables to directly compare but all the article is talking about is that these results have been found on Geekbench with the quote from a current Mercedes-Benz employee that may or may not be accurate.

    But to say that everything from Intel is "fake scores" is pretty much false in this context when, so far as is apparent, Intel doesn't appear to be involved in these results being published.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    6
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Intel Tiger Lake Core i7-1165G7 laptop benchmarks impress

    in general somehow suspiciously unreliable

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •