Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G desktop APU tested in Geekbench

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    30,077
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,940 times in 681 posts

    Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G desktop APU tested in Geekbench

    8C/16T APU is very similar in perf to the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 in single/multi core tests.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    240
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    12 times in 9 posts

    Re: Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G desktop APU tested in Geekbench

    I sort of wish they'd balanced the gpu/cpu side a little more towards the gpu... I'm currently running an ancient A10 so it it would be a heck of an upgrade for me, and I realise the 8CUs in this are stronger than the 11 in the 3400G... But I do think they could have made room for the 11 (or more) upgraded CUs and lopped off a core.

  3. #3
    Poor graduate. Ulti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,018
    Thanks
    714
    Thanked
    222 times in 191 posts
    • Ulti's system
      • Motherboard:
      • AsRock B450M Pro4
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 5 3600
      • Memory:
      • Team Group Delta 32GB
      • Storage:
      • Corsair MP510 960GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Palit GTX 1070 8GB
      • PSU:
      • SilverStone SX500-LG V2.0
      • Case:
      • Jonsbo UMX3 TG Version
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • AOC Agon AG322QC4 31.5"
      • Internet:
      • Plusnet Fibre Extra 80/20

    Re: Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G desktop APU tested in Geekbench

    Quote Originally Posted by Luke7 View Post
    I sort of wish they'd balanced the gpu/cpu side a little more towards the gpu... I'm currently running an ancient A10 so it it would be a heck of an upgrade for me, and I realise the 8CUs in this are stronger than the 11 in the 3400G... But I do think they could have made room for the 11 (or more) upgraded CUs and lopped off a core.
    That would indeed be nice. I'm hardly ever CPU bound but if I ever game I will become GPU bound quite quickly.

    I remember I bought the last gen HP Envy 13" x360 with the Ryzen 5 3500U and it would throttle and leave the CPU clocks rather high whilst lowering the GPU clocks when trying to run a basic game (FFXIV) - it was running above 30fps before throttling but only around 10fps when throttled. Although not quite the same, it would have been nice if they could make the GPU stronger relative to the CPU. Needless to say, neither matter when it throttles in less than 5 minutes so I returned it very quickly. It's a shame as it was such a nice machine.

    This year's HP Envy with the new Renoir Ryzen series seem very adequate though but again, still more CPU power than I'll ever need but lacking a bit in GPU power for it to be genuinely useful.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    407
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    24 times in 18 posts
    • Bagpuss's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Pro Wi-Fi
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9-9900K
      • Memory:
      • 32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4 3400
      • Storage:
      • Gigabyte 512GB NVMe SSD, Crucial 1Tb NVMe SSD, 6Tb Seagate 7200
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 2080 Black Edition
      • PSU:
      • Corsair 850 RMx 850 Gold
      • Case:
      • Fractal Meshify C Copper Front Panel
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • LG UK850 27in 4K HDR Freesync/Gsync
      • Internet:
      • Three Mobile 4G Unlimited Data (35-45Mbit)

    Re: Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G desktop APU tested in Geekbench

    I'd imagine this APU design is closer to the 8c16t CPU's used in the new consoles than the desktop 3700/3800's, especially with the cut down cache...and gives a pretty good idea of the consoles real CPU performance, relative to a desktop parts.

  5. #5
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    10,949
    Thanks
    585
    Thanked
    1,177 times in 1,002 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 30 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G desktop APU tested in Geekbench

    Quote Originally Posted by Luke7 View Post
    I sort of wish they'd balanced the gpu/cpu side a little more towards the gpu...
    Whereas I'm fine with a CPU heavy setup, I'm tempted to get one for my next work machine. I need enough graphics to drive two (preferably three) Displayport/hdmi monitors with some text editors. I just need to see some GCC code compile benchmarks on these things, though frankly from seeing what a 2200G can do I imagine these will be very nice.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    240
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked
    12 times in 9 posts

    Re: Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G desktop APU tested in Geekbench

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Luke7 View Post
    I sort of wish they'd balanced the gpu/cpu side a little more towards the gpu...
    Whereas I'm fine with a CPU heavy setup, I'm tempted to get one for my next work machine. I need enough graphics to drive two (preferably three) Displayport/hdmi monitors with some text editors. I just need to see some GCC code compile benchmarks on these things, though frankly from seeing what a 2200G can do I imagine these will be very nice.
    That's a fair enough point, I guess it works both ways really like the other reply to me said. Some of us need more gpu and less cpu, whilst some of us need max cpu and can do without gpu... I guess its a really hard thing to balance in terms of what will sell plus what they can physically do with how their CCXs work. Be nice if they could do both though lol

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    304
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    6 times in 6 posts

    Re: Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G desktop APU tested in Geekbench

    Bummer...Wasted the gpu again with wimp 8cu when it needed 16cu. 65w....LOL. You should have spent whatever you could get into 95w on GPU. That should be your goal for a desktop that doesn't care about power. This isn't a laptop model. WTF were you thinking? This could have been the HTPC chip to get, but...they AMD'd it again...Yeah, I'm coining a new term...Dang you just AMD'd it. At least pricing seems to be coming UP a bit. Maybe they'll have a quarter where NET INCOME is somewhere near their current stock price (way over it's worth!). RAISE your prices AMD.

  8. #8
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    10,949
    Thanks
    585
    Thanked
    1,177 times in 1,002 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 30 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G desktop APU tested in Geekbench

    Quote Originally Posted by Luke7 View Post
    I guess its a really hard thing to balance in terms of what will sell plus what they can physically do with how their CCXs work. Be nice if they could do both though lol
    I guess if they are getting about the same number of complaints from both sides then they balanced it about right.

    The die photo for Renoir look fairly balanced to me though:



    That compares to the previous Raven Ridge which looks like a GPU with a bit of CPU lost in the middle. I guess with half the transistors it was a bit more of a compromise. Nice chips, but my 2200G is back in the box waiting for a job it can be a bit underpowered at


  9. #9
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    87
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    5 times in 4 posts

    Re: Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G desktop APU tested in Geekbench

    very impressive numbers for the APU's, that is actually giving me a hope for a big improvement on Zen 3 full fat desktops CPU

  10. #10
    Moosekateer CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    29,687
    Thanks
    3,344
    Thanked
    4,669 times in 3,603 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G desktop APU tested in Geekbench



    Those despicable Elk,stealing the pond weed!

  11. #11
    Registered+
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    69
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts

    Re: Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G desktop APU tested in Geekbench

    Quote Originally Posted by half_empty_soul View Post
    very impressive numbers for the APU's, that is actually giving me a hope for a big improvement on Zen 3 full fat desktops CPU
    Why does this give you hope that the 3000 series hasn't already?

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    10,842
    Thanks
    656
    Thanked
    375 times in 261 posts

    Re: Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G desktop APU tested in Geekbench

    I’m on an i5-3470 in my server at the mo so I’m all about the CPU side rather than GPU so I’ll be looking at the reviews and benchmarks before I decide what I’m doing.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •