Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: AMD patent suggests it is looking closely at hybrid CPU designs

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    30,229
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1,940 times in 681 posts

    AMD patent suggests it is looking closely at hybrid CPU designs

    It proposes mixing "high-feature," and "low-feature" CPU cores in a single CPU/APU.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    HEXUS.Squirrel Output's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,928
    Thanks
    783
    Thanked
    320 times in 240 posts
    • Output's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte AORUS Master X570
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 Corsair Vengeance Platinum @ 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • Sandisk Ultra 3D 2TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte RX Vega 56 Gaming OC 8GB
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750
      • Case:
      • bequiet Dark Base Pro 900 Rev.2
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Dell P2214H

    Re: AMD patent suggests it is looking closely at hybrid CPU designs

    Would a patent even be able to be granted since ARM's big.LITTLE already exists as a prior example?

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,747
    Thanks
    111
    Thanked
    229 times in 165 posts

    Re: AMD patent suggests it is looking closely at hybrid CPU designs

    People call big.LITTLE as a generalised term and I see no reason why this patent wouldn't be permitted because it is around the handling of high and low featured cores and their interaction across the greater package.

    As I understand it, ARMs big.LITTLE architecture is consistent between the small and big cores and anything extra is extraneously accessed and the small cores are just literally "small" cores but are the same as the big ones?

  4. #4
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    11,033
    Thanks
    592
    Thanked
    1,191 times in 1,015 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 30 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: AMD patent suggests it is looking closely at hybrid CPU designs

    Quote Originally Posted by Output View Post
    Would a patent even be able to be granted since ARM's big.LITTLE already exists as a prior example?
    This isn't big.LITTLE

    I'm guessing the "small" cores here would have ripped out all the 16/32 bit support and all the garbage x86 CISC baggage like repeat instructions and complex addressing modes that even Intel have told us to avoid for decades.

    It if tries to run an old/complex instruction, the CPU saves context with an illegal instruction trap and the thread gets restored onto a full x86 CPU. That would need OS support, but Linux could adopt that quite quickly so could be interesting for cramming more cores into a server power envelope.

  5. Received thanks from:

    Output (10-08-2020),Tabbykatze (10-08-2020)

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,773
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked
    84 times in 75 posts

    Re: AMD patent suggests it is looking closely at hybrid CPU designs

    With the way that MS is making windows arm and x86/x64 compatible I've always wondered why AMD haven't pushed harder with making a combo chip (they supposedly were at one point according to google) with both types of cpu's or even an amd cpu with 'x86' instructions co-processor, to offset the impact of virtualisation.

  7. #6
    HEXUS.Squirrel Output's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,928
    Thanks
    783
    Thanked
    320 times in 240 posts
    • Output's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte AORUS Master X570
      • CPU:
      • AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 Corsair Vengeance Platinum @ 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • Sandisk Ultra 3D 2TB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte RX Vega 56 Gaming OC 8GB
      • PSU:
      • EVGA G3 750
      • Case:
      • bequiet Dark Base Pro 900 Rev.2
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Dell P2214H

    Re: AMD patent suggests it is looking closely at hybrid CPU designs

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    This isn't big.LITTLE
    I was assuming it would count as similar enough to be considered as having prior examples.

    I guess it just depends upon how detailed the patent application is. Probably because most times I hear about patents, it's usually the vague "how did that ever get granted?" type attempting to be used by patent trolls.

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    I'm guessing the "small" cores here would have ripped out all the 16/32 bit support and all the garbage x86 CISC baggage like repeat instructions and complex addressing modes that even Intel have told us to avoid for decades.

    It if tries to run an old/complex instruction, the CPU saves context with an illegal instruction trap and the thread gets restored onto a full x86 CPU. That would need OS support, but Linux could adopt that quite quickly so could be interesting for cramming more cores into a server power envelope.
    It will certainly be interesting to see how things play out. Obviously Intel has something upcoming, and this indicates that AMD does too - even if the article does state that it doesn't guarantee that AMD will make something based on the patent, I suspect it's likely to happen at some point so both companies have another thing to compete against each other with.

  8. #7
    <Insert witty one liner> Kanoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    845
    Thanks
    71
    Thanked
    79 times in 55 posts
    • Kanoe's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (Custom BIOS for NVMe Booting)
      • CPU:
      • 2x Intel Xeon E5-2667v2 @ Stock
      • Memory:
      • Samsung ECC RDIMM DDR3 PC-14900 128GB (8 x 16GB) @ Stock
      • Storage:
      • 960GB M.2, 960GB M.2, 960GB SSD, 2TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI Sea Hawk X 1080Ti (2012MHz @1.012V)
      • PSU:
      • Superflower 1200W
      • Case:
      • Phanteks Enthoo Primo v2
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 28" ASUS PB287Q 4k + 24" Dell U2412M
      • Internet:
      • VM @ 940/45

    Re: AMD patent suggests it is looking closely at hybrid CPU designs

    Quote Originally Posted by LSG501 View Post
    With the way that MS is making windows arm and x86/x64 compatible I've always wondered why AMD haven't pushed harder with making a combo chip (they supposedly were at one point according to google) with both types of cpu's or even an amd cpu with 'x86' instructions co-processor, to offset the impact of virtualisation.
    They did, the ARM core was being used to run security features rather than as a low power alternative.

  9. #8
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    11,033
    Thanks
    592
    Thanked
    1,191 times in 1,015 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3200MHz
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 30 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Samsung 2343BW 2048x1152
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: AMD patent suggests it is looking closely at hybrid CPU designs

    Quote Originally Posted by Output View Post
    I was assuming it would count as similar enough to be considered as having prior examples.
    Only if you look at it as a power saving core and a full core co-operating.

    This is the first I have heard of where some cores are incapable of running all code. The knock on from that is pretty huge.

  10. Received thanks from:

    Output (10-08-2020)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •