Read more.Quote:
And the first image of these desktop processors 'in the flesh' is shared online.
Printable View
Read more.Quote:
And the first image of these desktop processors 'in the flesh' is shared online.
i wish Intel, AMD and Nvidia would all release their CPU's and GPU's at the same time, it would make comparisons sooooo much easier.
Not that I'm a huge fan of geekbench but including the 3900x/3950x would have been nice, and arguably more relevant for some users.
3950x
1292 - Single-Core Score
14097 - Multi-Core Score
3900x
1280 - Single-Core Score
11861 - Multi-Core Score
That kind of brings out a bit of an anomaly on the multicore for the 5950x, the odds of it being slower than the 3950x is pretty slim considering all other 'benches' we've seen....
Every reviewer on the planet are sharpening their pitchforks for you now. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by will19565
Seriously though it would be a mess if everyone released all their CPU's and GPU's at the same time, can you imagine trying to review upwards of 10+ different products all on the same day.
it would show who were the paid reviewers but apart from that, chaos!Quote:
Originally Posted by Corky34
Maybe the 5xxx series were being run at lower clocks?
(In reply to LSG501)
Maybe the 5xxx series were being run at lower clocks?Quote:
Originally Posted by LSG501
Possible but whatever it is it's lower than it should be imo, AMD scales pretty well with core count (always have done in all honesty) and it seems to do it quite well with the 5900x.Quote:
Originally Posted by ohmaheid
It just doesn't seem 'right' for the newest cores which are faster per clock to be slower, even with a 100mhz lower clock (which the 5900x has as well), in multi-core score on the 5950x. In all honesty I'd expect closer to the 15,250 range for the 5950x based on some rudimentary assumptions and maths based off the 3xxx series.
Being bored i started browsing geekbech multi-core scores for the 3950x and they're all over the place, I'm guessing that 14097 - Multi-Core Score for the 3950x must be an average or something as scores seem to jump around from the high 800's on linux to the high 1600's on OSX and Windows.Quote:
Originally Posted by LSG501
I just took the first link that came up in google tbh, but those varaitions could just be geekbench being geekbench.... It's often used to compare stuff between operating systems/architectures but they're all compiled differently and make use of any coprocessors etc so the only real use it has is comparing like for like and even then I wouldn't say it's necessarily reliable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Corky34
Yea that's the point i was trying to make, sorry that it came across as questioning the score you posted as that wasn't the intention, tis why i said geekbench must be basing that on an average or something.Quote:
Originally Posted by LSG501
Either way TIL geekbench is strange and doesn't seem to be much use as a benchmark.
In all honesty it isn't really unless you're an apple fan and want to quote the high numbers it gets to 'support' your choice of an iPhone lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Corky34