That might be an interesting thread in it's own right.
Is it intentionally misleading if you simply keep quiet and don't actively prevent people from reaching an incorrect conclusion?
Is it lying if you tell the exact truth in a way that people don't believe you?
And in relation to consumer purchases, why on earth would buyers not be expected to take reasonable care to ask questions before buying. After all, in relation to almost all aspects of buying from a non-trader (except, for example, safety-critical aspects of buying a car) the golden rule is "caveat emptor" - let the buyer beware. As my old consumer law lecturer rather eloquently put it, when buying a horse, walk around it and check there's a leg on each corner.
Standards are a bit more onerous for a trade seller, but really only amount to Sale of Goods Act (now Consumer Rights laws) of as described, satisfactory quality, etc). Sellers aren't responsible for evaluating the various options for buyers and determining which suits them best, not least because they don't know what priorities the buyer has.
Buyers should accept some responsibility for checking out that what they're buying is the best option for them, not expecting sellers to read their minds and do it for them.
Manufacturers should be expected to provide accurate info and spec's, but not to read between the lines as to what more you get if you buy a more expensive model.
For example, when buying a car I always avoid manufacturers sound systems and go for the very minimum available because I'm willing (and do) then spend several grand putting in my choice of after-market system.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

