Read more.Observed max GPU temp of 63°C, system was stable using reference air cooler.
Read more.Observed max GPU temp of 63°C, system was stable using reference air cooler.
Pretty nuts if true, able to hit such high clock frequencies, while being stable and only consuming a smidge more than the designed power envelope.
It seems unlikely that AMD would leave so much performance on the table, that would be an odd situation nowadays if 2.5GHz or even 2.4GHz was reliably hit.
We'll have to see what the supply is like. Going conservative might be an attempt to get more silicon in products.
how to destroy nvidia .. just make all those that scream OMG have you seen this ..reviewers tech sites .. fan boi's of both sides .. shout amd for a change ..
the more noise they can make the more market share they will grab .. and what a better way than leave a rubbishrubbishrubbishrubbish tonne of o/c room ..
What does it matter now if men believe or no?
What is to come will come. And soon you too will stand aside,
To murmur in pity that my words were true
(Cassandra, in Agamemnon by Aeschylus)
To see the wizard one must look behind the curtain ....
Not gonna touch Nvidia, before I know for sure what Radeon can give me, that is for sure....
So ! Nvidia cards can do that too,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Snap
The crazy thing is Polaris really wasn't too bad at OCing with the right cooling. My launch day 480 Nitro+ is currently clocking up above 580 levels and all through one click in AMD's driver. It really was a luck of the draw on how good/bad your chip was and poor cooling solutions that caused issues at launch. With the 580's they had just dialled in the chip production and put better coolers on.
Really hopeful for these but went for a Series X instead as it was cheaper... Still good news all round for AMD. Will look to pick one up in about a year.
Tabbykatze (17-11-2020)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)