Intel says AMD laptops sacrifice performance for battery life

[Tabbykatze]

Not disagreeing with your point, but (pedant mode on) .... it can't really be a duopoly, or certainly not an effective one, if either duopolist can force suppliers to do much of anything, unless there is collusion between the duopolists, and not only is that illegal but in this case would suggest AMD actively sought to screw itself.

Intel's putative actions suggest it is, or at least believes itself to be, effectively a monopoly. At an absolute minimum, a duopoly with a substantial element of monopolistic power.

Just sayin'.

Duopoly is certainly the wrong word, lets leave it at "anti-competitive actions to force a monopoly".

I used the term duopoly as there really is only two competitors in the commercial CPU space for desktops and laptops.

[ik9000]

Duopoly is certainly the wrong word, lets leave it at "anti-competitive actions to force a monopoly".

I used the term duopoly as there really is only two competitors in the commercial CPU space for desktops and laptops.

Isn't it technically 3 now apple have their apple-M silicon stuff in the market for macs (derived from ARM IIRC)?

[ohmaheid]

Hexus won't post my original posts, just thjs doesn't surprise me one little but.


It's nothing new from what Intel have done in the past.

Ditto.

[Tabbykatze]

Isn't it technically 3 now apple have their apple-M silicon stuff in the market for macs (derived from ARM IIRC)?

Mmm, yes and no, Apple isn't going to sell it others in the market, it's theirs and theirs alone.

I would say it's "difficult" to classify them in the same basket as Intel/AMD

[bowepa]

If you want performance, get a PC laptop is for battery life.

[DavidThompton]

I would recommend you to try <a href="https://book-of-ra-slot.com/dolphins-pearl-spiel/">dolphins pearl spiel</a>. There you can play or if you don't want to spend your money you can play demo.