Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 19 of 19

Thread: Windows on Arm gets x64 emulation support in latest beta

  1. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    1,617
    Thanks
    167
    Thanked
    227 times in 208 posts
    • kompukare's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V LX
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-3570K
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 8GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 850 EVo 500GB | Corsair MP510 960GB | 2 x WD 4TB spinners
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sappihre R7 260X 1GB (sic)
      • PSU:
      • Antec 650 Gold TruePower (Seasonic)
      • Case:
      • Aerocool DS 200 (silenced, 53.6 litres)l)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10-64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x ViewSonic 27" 1440p

    Re: Windows on Arm gets x64 emulation support in latest beta

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    Hahahaha yes but in this case, they have removed a lot of things as well. Mac Mini and M1 laptops have limited IO, no ram interface and limited pci-e lanes. They've removed the dram interface and integrated the dram on the chip. They have thunderbolt lanes but because of what's been chopped not full thunderbolt connectivity. Removed a lot of ways to communicate with the outside wolrd and the usb implementation is slow. Now if someone else tried that in say the pc arm space, they'd be derided. But as it's Apple nobody looks at that. So the M1 is useless out of the niche market that Apple have over the last couple of years created for themselves. Heck even the Pi has loads more io available - and yes I know that's because it has 40 pins available...
    I like the M1 - but it's only useful to Apple and what they are trying to do. For me, not enough usb lanes for starters for anything I'd probably want to do (Macbook Pro has 2 x usb-c ports... and 1 is for charging)
    But aren't you mainly criticizing the SOC (Unicore, what used to be the traditional northbridges/southbridges)?
    What's impressive about Apple's ARM designs is the CPU performance (and in the case of the M1 the GPU too) with them being way faster than Qualcomm or ARM. Although since Qualcomm and Samsung gave up making their own, everybody except Apple is basically using ARM's design.

    What I see in a lot of tech forums is a major (IMO justified) fear of Apple's success leading others to copy them and therefore massively decreasing choice for enthusiasts.

    And yes, there is a reason almost every company wants to copy Apple's business model rather than the free-for-all commodity PC market which allow enthusiasts to do what they want.

    However, acknowledging that Apple's SOC design group is very talented does not meant that I want to confined into an Apple-like walled garden were everything is disposable.

  2. #18
    root Member DanceswithUnix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the middle of a core dump
    Posts
    12,342
    Thanks
    714
    Thanked
    1,408 times in 1,190 posts
    • DanceswithUnix's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus X470-PRO
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 32GB 3200MHz ECC
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Linux, 1TB Games (Win 10)
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus Strix RX Vega 56
      • PSU:
      • 650W Corsair TX
      • Case:
      • Antec 300
      • Operating System:
      • Fedora 33 + Win 10 Pro 64 (yuk)
      • Monitor(s):
      • Benq XL2730Z 1440p + Iiyama 27" 1440p
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb/20Mb VDSL

    Re: Windows on Arm gets x64 emulation support in latest beta

    Quote Originally Posted by 3dcandy View Post
    Hahahaha yes but in this case, they have removed a lot of things as well. Mac Mini and M1 laptops have limited IO, no ram interface and limited pci-e lanes. They've removed the dram interface and integrated the dram on the chip. They have thunderbolt lanes but because of what's been chopped not full thunderbolt connectivity. Removed a lot of ways to communicate with the outside wolrd and the usb implementation is slow. Now if someone else tried that in say the pc arm space, they'd be derided. But as it's Apple nobody looks at that. So the M1 is useless out of the niche market that Apple have over the last couple of years created for themselves. Heck even the Pi has loads more io available - and yes I know that's because it has 40 pins available...
    I like the M1 - but it's only useful to Apple and what they are trying to do. For me, not enough usb lanes for starters for anything I'd probably want to do (Macbook Pro has 2 x usb-c ports... and 1 is for charging)
    Oh there are a ton of reasons why I won't be spending money on one of these things.

    The lack of connectivity is quite odd though. Many machines in computing history could have a large part of their success down to their ability to take plug in cards, including the Apple II. The original PC was a dog of a product, but oh the ISA bus was so useful. Even the Pi I doubt would have taken off without that header.

    I'm still convinced that Nvidia will want to aim for the high end with ARM, and the latest ARM cores look pretty quick. Denver was one of the few interesting recent CPU designs. Should be interesting times ahead.

  3. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    West Sussex
    Posts
    1,617
    Thanks
    167
    Thanked
    227 times in 208 posts
    • kompukare's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77-V LX
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5-3570K
      • Memory:
      • 4 x 8GB DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 850 EVo 500GB | Corsair MP510 960GB | 2 x WD 4TB spinners
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sappihre R7 260X 1GB (sic)
      • PSU:
      • Antec 650 Gold TruePower (Seasonic)
      • Case:
      • Aerocool DS 200 (silenced, 53.6 litres)l)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10-64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x ViewSonic 27" 1440p

    Re: Windows on Arm gets x64 emulation support in latest beta

    Quote Originally Posted by DanceswithUnix View Post
    Oh there are a ton of reasons why I won't be spending money on one of these things.

    The lack of connectivity is quite odd though. Many machines in computing history could have a large part of their success down to their ability to take plug in cards, including the Apple II. The original PC was a dog of a product, but oh the ISA bus was so useful. Even the Pi I doubt would have taken off without that header.

    I'm still convinced that Nvidia will want to aim for the high end with ARM, and the latest ARM cores look pretty quick. Denver was one of the few interesting recent CPU designs. Should be interesting times ahead.
    Aside from the Apple II and some NuBus and PowerPC Macs, Apple has philosophically been against expansion for decades.
    Possibly a bit simplistic, but I think Jobs just hated the idea of anyone other than Apple making money of their machines (and probably told Wozniak never to include an expansion card again)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •