Read more.Quote:
I'm content with my 7,781 points - can you go higher?
Printable View
Read more.Quote:
I'm content with my 7,781 points - can you go higher?
Single core: 1596
Multi core: 15832
Cpu: 5800x
Ram: 3600mhz CL16
Motherboard: Asus Strix B550-E Gaming
No standalone versions?
8349 here - Ryzen 7 2700. Not bad for a 65 w cpu
Core i9-9900k @ a lowly 10208
8740 multi and 1203 single core on my Intel i7-8700K.
i7 4790k @ 4.08Ghz
12Gb DDR3 Ram
ASUS Z97-P
Multi Core : 4729
Single Core : 1059
Ageing system now but still good for gaming at 1080p High settings so happy enough.
Single Core - 705
Multi Core - 13033
May I ask, Is your system spec up to date? if so, how doe's that 3080 FE run in it? games wise, if you play them that is. sorry for going off topic, I know it would have been a total work horse in its day! just seeing such low single core, then games getting more multi threaded etc, quite interesting to know.
Edit: because of the 2x Xeon's
Ryzen 7 2700
Single core: 992
Multi core: 8658
As someone else said, not bad for a 65W CPU.
No need to install. It downloads a zip and you run the exe from within the zip. It creates a local folder or two eg for results but pretty low footprint.
Direct link to offline zips (they call them installers - they aren't you just unzip them):
PC
Mac
Techpowerup also have links to the R15 (win7+10 and last version with openGL test) and R20 (win7+10 and basiclly same as R23 but with different score rating - roughly a 2.58x multiplier to get from R20 to R23 scoring if you have old R20 test results) Since R23 won't work in win7 (or at least it wouldn't when I tried) run R20 (same test image) and use the multiplier.
My scores:
[to be uploaded shortly]
edit - uploaded as separate post on page 2 here: https://forums.hexus.net/hexus-news/...ml#post4287352
2nd edit - to get it on first page: Remember to go to settings/prefences -> advanced, so it shows both the multi core and single thread options, and then to run both. Also remember to state your CPU and mobo.
Ryzen 7 5800X
14348
11390 Multi
1229 Single
here you go:
18807; 1370 for 3900x on x570 MSI ACE
and how it compares between win7 and win 10 (hardly at all)
and between gtx460 and RTX3070 (the only big difference is in open GL (obviously for a CPU test in R23 there is no difference))
and some comparison to my i7-870 s1156 H55 system of 10 years ago.
https://i.ibb.co/nb8JhM2/Cinebench-R23-Comparison.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/vc0nPCN/Cinebench-R20-Comparison.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/kKYktp4/Cinebench-R15-Comparison.jpg
CPU Cores Clock Single Multi
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 - 12c/24t 3.8GHz 1,310 18,125
Intel i7-4770S - 4c/8t 3.1GHz 866 4,259
Intel i5-4210M - 2c/4t 2.6GHz 549 1,661
Intel i3-4330 - 2c/4t 3.5GHz 745 1,853
Intel i7-3770K - 4c/8t 4.2GHz 820 4,136
I've got an i7-2700K, Phenom 9950, Core2 Q6600, and K6/3 knocking around in the spare room, so I might get around to benchmarking them over the weekend.
I have no idea, and absolutely no inclination to find out.
i think its over a decade since i ran any benchmark on a computer.
My machine do everything i want it to do, though not at a power consumption i would like, but that would necessitate a complete new build, or at least a new CPU and motherboard.
My machine idle at 180 watts.
Go on please, it's a threadripper system and it would be great to add it to the Hexus chart!
Here's the chart as it stands so far today:
https://i.ibb.co/C9hnN9n/Hexus-Cineb...1-20210313.jpg
I'll add more as they come in - and if anyone wants to share missing system details let me know and I'll add those too. I'm currently logging:
CPU; Cooler; motherboard type; RAM size; RAM type; RAM speed; RAM latency (as the chart notes on the right)
I'll assume the CPU is at stock unless you say otherwise.
CPU: Ryzen 9 5950X
Single: 1644
Multi: 25144
Yey! Someone managed to find a 5950X - so the unicorn does exist in the wild! I imagine you'll be top and stay there for some time unless someone rocks in with a server or something similar. I'll add you to the next chart with tomorrow's entries (sry i need to head to bed now.) Welcome to Hexus btw - cracking choice for a first post!
If anyone has a 3950x and 5900x it'd be mighty interesting to see how big the leap is from 3900x to 5900x and 3950x to 5950x
The K6/3 is on Win98 so I probably can't run Cinebench on that. Everything else on my list has Win10.
I've got the bits for an old dual-core Opteron, some Athlon 64 x2's and a Core2 Duo E6600. They'll all run Win10, but I don;t have enough PSUs or cases to have them all assembled at once.
My R9-3900X has 32GB DDR4-3200 and an MSI x570 mobo and a huge Noctua cooler
The i7-4770S has 16GB DDR3-1600 and a low profile Noctua cooler
The i5-4210M is a Clevo laptop and has 16GB DDR3-1600
The i3-4330 has 8GB DDR3-1600 and is in an HP SFF case with custom cooler
The i7-3770K has 16GB DDR3-1866 and is OC'd to 4.2GHz on all cores (stock is 3.5GHz) with an Arctic Freezer 13
I can't remember the mobo specs or RAM timings off the top of my head.
Single core: 1574
Multi core: 15223
5800x (Ram needs tuning)
Definitely stock, cooler I'm using is a Corsair Hydro H115i RGB Platinum set to quiet mode (barely hear it even under full load). I'm actually surprised there is such a variation between mine and the 9900k results posted by nar. Of course this is completely unscientific due to the variation in background processes running on each PC. Interesting to see the generational improvements though, in real world scenarios.
Single core: 1,103
Multi core: 10,003
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core Processor
RAM: 32 GB (8 GB x 4), 2,998 MHz CL16 (DDR4-3000)
Motherboard: X470 Gaming Pro
OS: Windows 10, 64 Bit, Professional Edition (build 19042)
Same system, but after swapping to a Ryzen 5 5600X
Single core: 1,529
Multi core: 9,550
Single: 1285
Mutli: 9461
CPU: Ryzen 5 3600X
Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212X
RAM: 16GB (3600 CL16)
MoBo: X570 Aorus Pro
Single core 1581 pts
Multi core 15158 pts
CPU 5800x
Ram 3600mhz CL18
Msi X570 gaming plus
EVGA RTX2070 super
Single 1292
Multi 12274
3800X
Single: 1304
Multi: 12898
CPU: Ryzen 7 3700X
Cooler: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280
MB: ASRock X570 Extreme4
RAM: 16GB (8GB x2), 3800MHz CL16 (optimised sub timings), FCLK - 1900MHz
It's OK in most situations. Looking at the scores from 3dmark compared to hexus review scores I'm very much as expected.
I don't feel like it's holding me back too much.
There are a couple of games I do worry about due to the very low single core performance and I can see the games only using one core but it's still doing OK.
Latest scores on the doors. Keep it coming folks!
https://i.ibb.co/Dffb4xP/Hexus-Cineb...2-20210313.jpg
Also here's a normalised chart which makes for a more interesting comparison I think. (I've deliberately left the order as before).
https://i.ibb.co/n04xgV4/Hexus-Cineb...2-20210313.jpg
Edit: Here are charts sorted by CPU multi/no threads and by CPU single
https://i.ibb.co/JHFKZ8D/Hexus-Cineb...2-20210313.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/YXV2JJ7/Hexus-Cineb...2-20210313.jpg
These show the generational improvement in Ryzen 5000 series over 3000 series in single thread (by 20-25%), but little to no difference in the multi CPU/thread, with the exception of the R7-5800x which seems to show a consistent leap versus both its predecessors and its current siblings, even against the 5950x. *
Compared to the 5950x the 5800x has 96-97% of the single thread performance, while its multicore performance per thread is 20%-25% better in these results. Bang for buck that's pretty appealing, and unless the 5900x comes in similarly performing, then it does give some grounds to people going for a 5800x if they don't need the extra cores.
*Edit 2 - 5600x score will come in v0.3 chart, and shows it performing similarly to the 5800x - it might be this 5950x sample is hitting a thermal limit, TBC if we can get more samples from people using R9-5900x and R9-5950x (and 5700x would be useful too). It could just be the lower clock speed of the 5950 (3.4GHz vs 3.7-3.8GHz for the rest of the 5000x models) holding it back.
Sry missed this on my sweep through. I've added your cooler in, it will show in v0.3 with the next updates. The difference could be down to a variety of things, but the cooling is an interesting one to see. I wish I hadn't turned down the chance to review that MSI AIO in December - I'd love to see how the NH-U14S compares to a decent AIO. Especially now I've worked out the best fans to use with the Noctua (and no, they're not Noctua)
Single Core: 1,595
Multi Core: 15,166 (initial score), 15,562 (score after replacing thermal paste with Kryonaut)
CPU: Ryzen 7 5800X
RAM: 2x16GiB Crucial 3600MHz CL16
Cooler: Noctua NH-D15S with 2x ultra quiet (<16 dBA) Nanoxia fans
Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk Max
Single Core: 1516
Multi Core: 11509
CPU: 5600X
so adding the 5600x into the mix shows it doing fairly similarly to the 5800x in terms of per-thread and single core performance. I wonder if the 5950x is hitting some kind of thermal throttling.
@Beffa what cooler, mobo, ram are you using with it?
Does anyone have a 5700x and/or 5900x they can add into this (and a 3950x for that matter)?
Mobo: MSI X570 Tomahawk
RAM: G.Skill Trdent Z Neo 3600Mhz, 64GB
Cooler: Deepcool Castle 360
GPU: XFX Radeon RX 6900XT Merc 319
Case Be Quiet! Dark Base Pro 900.
I will make a few more tests today, I have cleared CMOS and updated Bios because of a missing Bluetooth (Might have been some other things missing too)
Edit on edit:
Single 1635 Max temp 63C (Stock)
Multi 25100 Max temp 54C (Stock)
Tried a few runs with some overclock and hit 29810 at best for multi, could not a better score in single mode with OC
5900X
Single Core: 1,645
Multi Core: 21,892
10700K
Single Core: 1,378
Multi Core: 11,969
Both at stock, they're running optimized for silence not airflow though (mostly closed caes, NH-D15 with ULNA) so they'd probably boost a bit higher in more open cases
On my Xeon E5-2670 0 (8 core, 16 Thread, 2.6Ghz):
Multicore: 5363
Single core 587
MP ratio 9.13x
and my ancient core 2 quad Q9550 (4 core, 4 thread, 2.84GHz):
Multicore: 1234
Single core 401
MP ratio 3.08x
CPU: Intel i5-9600K @3.7 GHz (i.e. stock)
Memory: 3200 MHz, CL16, 16 GB
Motherboard: Asus Prime Z390-A
Cooler: Noctua NH-U12S
OS: Windows 10
Single core: 1060
Multi core: 5419
With an overclock to 4.8 GHz by "Asus AI Overclocking":
Single core: 1225
Multi core 6565
I'd be really surprised if the single core bench throttles. I was watching my core temps using HWInfo64 when running the single core and it looks like the process for Cinebench was being moved around the different cores while running, not sure if anyone else notices this behaviour if they monitor the core temps. I only noticed it because I was curious what a light overclock would do to my scores (set all cores to run static @4.9 = 12600/1305).
You won't want to add this to any graphic.
Single: 652
Multi: 2069
A10-7860K @4.5GHz
ASRock FM2A88X Extreme4+
EDIT: some intriguing results under Linux.
Yeah Zen should move load around to the best cores IIRC. Not really sure how it does that, but seem to remember people saying it did this. Re throttling I was meaning more on multi core than single thread - due to accumulated heat from many cores. I wondered if it might account for that missing 10%? There's more than enough RAM in Beff'a system.
Edit: when Beffa's manual OC score is applied it hits the right place to correlate with the other CPUs that are doing it natively. This suggests there is something holding back the auto-overclock on multithreaded performance, that doesn't necessarily need to be doing so. Perhaps the PBO settings needs adjusting?
Latest charts (absolute and normalised) - using thumbnail links now as they're getting large. Thanks all and keep 'em coming.
absolute (ranked by multi cpu score)
https://i.ibb.co/cFKvQR7/Hexus-Cineb...3-20210313.jpg
normalised (but still ranked by multi cpu score)
https://i.ibb.co/YWDF6yY/Hexus-Cineb...3-20210313.jpg
normalised and ranked by multi core score/no. threads
https://i.ibb.co/wK7KYbp/Hexus-Cineb...3-20210313.jpg
normalised and ranked by single core score
https://i.ibb.co/jTzRSJ6/Hexus-Cineb...3-20210313.jpg
As mentioned above: your normalised manual OC score hits the right place to correlate with the other 5000 series CPUs that are doing it natively. This suggests there is something holding back the auto-overclock on multithreaded performance that doesn't necessarily need to be doing so. Perhaps the PBO settings needs adjusting? Did you have PBO on for the first test?
Asus strix G15 Laptop (2021)
5800H/3070 RTX
12600 Multi . . . not bad for a 45w cpu :)
Single core 1363
When I first looked at your charts with score pr. core I wonder what the **** was wrong, cleared CMOS, flashed bios and still was not able to do better than last night. Then I had to search the big Internet for other that had a 5950x and had made a Cinebench23 test. It looks like my scores was spot on for stock and OC, the problem of a top of the line CPU is almost the same as the GPU. You have to pay 100% more money to get 15 to 30% more power, with some tiny adjustments I might break the 30K. Also had some thoughts of the amount of RAM holding my score back a tiny bit
First test was done with stock settings, re-tested today after clearing CMOS and flashing Bios, got results like +/- 1640/21500, then did some tests with PBO and got +/- 1630/29800
MULIT 6496
SINGLE 874
Ryzen 5 1600
Ram 3000Mhz
B350
3700x
Single 1263
Multi 12347
Ancient i5-4690K
Multi - 3267
Single - 854
Okay since you ask so polite, and i can DL from Microsoft where i will get the full gigabit Dl speed.
System spec stock CPU speed on the 1920X and just 48GB or RAM at the moment.
Multi: 12464
Single: 966
i3 7100T (2C/4T)
1836 Multi
693 Single
i3 10100F (4C/8T)
5203 Multi
1114 Single
Single Core: 1631
Multi Core: 21683
CPU: 5900X
Ram: 3600@CL16
MB: Asus X570 ROG Gaming E
It definitely shouldn't be the heat causing an issue, not with that cooling.
Looking at the chart, I'd say AMD have made great strides with both Zen 2 and Zen 3, especially when you look at the multicore score for the 5800H in a laptop (45W) matching my overclocked multicore score on a 9900KF which is more power hungry. Intel is definitely languishing down the bottom half of those charts.
What I've found interesting is the oc,d Intel i5 hitting a high multi/thread. It does suggest there is some chance that with a better architecture node they can pull things back; they just need to get the die size down and power draws to competing levels. I say just... If it was that ready they'd have done it already.
Multi - 13173
Single - 1304
3700x, 16GB 3200MHz CL16
Asus ROG Strix B450-F Gaming, BIOS 4007
Win 10, 20H2 (19042.867)
Double post..
i3 4160T (2C/4T)
1795 multi
745 single
That is SOOOOO close to the 7100T and beats it in single, even though there are 3 gens difference!
Undoubtedly the process node will make a difference, how much? I guess we'll have to wait and see. The i5 9600K does seem to be a bit of an outlier though, perhaps the lack of hyperthreading helps it on the overclock side of things (my 9700K overclocked far better than the 9900KF). I do however like how scalable the architecture of the Zen cores are, it shows how consistent they are.
Just a shame about the pricing on the 5xxx series, if they had kept it more in line with the 3xxx series I'd have gone AMD subject to availability. They would make their profit through sheer volume instead of relying on margin alone, which would have also helped them with market share compared to Intel. So the business decision to charge more because the chips are better, probably hurts them longer term.
i5 4210u (2C/4T)
Multi 1137
Single 551
Mine scored over 1. Anything more than that is just pathetic e-peening :)
Single 1532 multi 11356.
Ryzen 5600x
Msi MAG X570 Tomahawk WIFI.
Crucial Ballistix 16GB Kit (2 x 8GB) DDR4-3200.
AGH. I tried this once and got a pathetic 8686 on multithreaded on a 3900X. Something was up but I've just recently got out of the local major trauma unit, and I wasn't up to finding the problem.
Found the problem today and reran the benchmark. Multi of 17756 and single 1292.
I'm pretty sure it would have been slightly higher, but Windows decided that whilst I was loading all cores to their max and clearly doing something requiring all the available chooch, that THIS was the time to run a virus scan.
Max CPU temperature was around 73C and max CPU power draw was around 117W. Peak multithreaded speed was around 4.04GHz and single was around 4.4GHz. I think there is room for improvement here but honestly this thing is plenty fast for me and I've no need to overclock it now. I might consider delving into it when my PC isn't quite so important to me and when I have the mental and physical ability to repair any issues.
Spec 3900X, 16GB RAM @ 3200, 6 year old liquid cooler which I'm expecting to die soon, X570 Aorus something (lower end).
Interestingly, despite the issue which caused the CPU performance to half, I haven't noticed any issues in use. But I've not been up to playing any fast paced games lately but it might explain some of the weird crashes when I've had 3 or 4 VMs running whilst expecting plenty of resources to be available compared to what I've assigned them. It might also be that two of the VMs were Windows 10 machines.
ryzen 5800x 15446
Multi core: 10989
Single core: 1532
(stock 5600x, never went above 50oC 8) - all about that quiet life haha)
5950X PBO on.
Single: 1525
Multi: 27132
Not that great though I am not expecting much as this is a launch day CPU and this board is not a OC champion by any means.
Now I do have another 5950X from a later batch on a Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Dark Hero that I building for my bro so I shall bench that for a comparison soon.
Thanks all, latest charts:
absolute (ranked by multi cpu score)
https://i.ibb.co/gM5Qh71/Hexus-Cineb...4-20210315.jpg
normalised (but still ranked by multi cpu score)
https://i.ibb.co/QQMxYB6/Hexus-Cineb...4-20210315.jpg
normalised and ranked by multi core score/no. threads
https://i.ibb.co/bF6r9HX/Hexus-Cineb...4-20210315.jpg
normalised and ranked by single core score
https://i.ibb.co/JnHVc5h/Hexus-Cineb...4-20210315.jpg
Intel I7-5930K
64GB DDR4-2133 SDRAM
Asus X99-Deluxe
Single core: 826
Multi core: 5983
Had the system Since Nov 2015
4790K @ 4.7GHz all core, 16GB DDR3 1800, NH-U12P, Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD5H
Single Core: 1129
Multi-Core: 5490
Interesting to see all these plotted, the trusty old 4790K (OC) almost getting beaten by the £80 i3-10100F.
My Dell Precision M6800 laptop with an i7 4810MQ CPU running at 2.8Ghz and 16Gb of RAM
2755 with all 4 cores and 8 threads. I cannot be bothered running the single core, I'd loose the will to live.
:-((
You're probably throttling. Dell cooling leaves a lot to be desired I really don't know why they put i7 chips in some of their machines, a lot of the real-world tests show the cooler running i5 outperform it due to a better net thermal headroom. Particularly so when they introduced the "high-end" iris pro graphics that seem to gobble-up the thermal envelope available at the first sign of any animation.
Intel Core i7 8750H on an MSI laptop: 1021 single-core, 4901 multi-core (4.80x). It maxed out at 45.03W on multi-core, and stayed at about 28W single-core (with the 4 GHz turbo kicking in).
Core i5 2500K, at 3.3 GHz (turbo disabled): 632 single, 2276 multi (3.60x). At 4.0 GHz all-core overclocked: 776 single, 2907 multi (3.75X). Even at 4 GHz, it used 76.34W maximum, significantly below its 95W TDP, with a max temperature of 62C (with a Hyper 212 Evo cooler). Single-core at 4 GHz, it used 30W, just slightly more than the laptop's CPU at 4 GHz (although the laptop one was about 60% faster in IPC).
I wish Rocket Lake and Intel's newer CPUs in general were so considerate about the TDP. The low noise level of the 2500K at 4 GHz is quite acceptable; I'm doubtful I'd find the same with an 11700K that can peak at two to three times that depending on the workload. *checks if AMD has released the 5800 to retail yet*
CPU Ryzen R5-3600 @ 3.6GHZ 6 core 12 thread
Memory 16 GB Corsair CMK16GX4M273600C18 'Ryzen optimized' (according to scan website) running at 3597mhz
Motherboard Asus ROG STRIX B450-F Gaming, BIOS 4204 (28/1/2021)
Cooler Stock. wraith stealth, runs at mid 30's C in windows.
cinebench bumped it to 52C ish. for single core, occasionaly went to 4200mhz for about a second, mainly stayed at 3600
72C multi core, clock went to 4025mhz for entire run (according to ASUS AI suite 3)
OS Windows 10 64bit build 19042
cinebench scores
Multi 9450 pts
Single 1245 pts
MP ratio 7.59 x
the 5800x has been out for weeks - stocks levels are low and they sell out instantly.
the i5-2500k and i7-2700k were excellent chips. IIRC intel still soldered that generation, and they had miles of OC potential, so much so intel locked the BCLK to stop people just buying those instead of i7-920 et al on x58. By decoupling the mem controller in 1155 vs linked in 1156 the memory OC was also much easier and more capable. With proper unlocking those chips could easily have done 5GHz+ on air, and still could with water cooling just off the multi alone. I'd suggest trying to get yours up to 4.5GHz, that was a good common level at the time IIRC. I really wish they'd left bclk unlocked. There was real fun in playing around with bclk, multi and turbo ratios, then balancing that with mclock ratios and ram multi to get the RAM to its sweetspot alongside it. OC'ing my i3-540 and i7-870 was fun. I got it 4GHz on all cores and turboing up to 7.4GHz (according to HWmonitor anyway, though I suspect that is a transient and not the actual speed)
https://i.ibb.co/x5zr0p3/old-i7-870-OC-transient.jpg
Enlightening - that My 4th Gen Intel 4C/8T old home PC beats out my works 6c/12T 8th Gen lol
Already a result in the table very close to My 4th Gen of the same CPU type so I'll just give my works HP desktop I7-8700 CPU @3.2Ghz Single core = 977 Multicore = 4999 {Shocking}
Thanks all, just doing the new charts now.
Edit: latest charts (v0.5)
absolute (ranked by multi cpu score)
https://i.ibb.co/HFFq8mm/Hexus-Cineb...5-20210316.jpg
normalised (but still ranked by multi cpu score)
https://i.ibb.co/PCrpNLt/Hexus-Cineb...5-20210316.jpg
normalised and ranked by multi core score/no. threads
https://i.ibb.co/jLbfXkJ/Hexus-Cineb...5-20210316.jpg
normalised and ranked by single core score
https://i.ibb.co/zQYYBmH/Hexus-Cineb...5-20210316.jpg
Apologies, I didn't specify my cooler before.
MSI MAG CORELIQUID 360R using Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut :)
The missing specs for my entries too:
5900X - MSI B450 Tomahawk, 16GB DDR4 3200 CL16
10700K - Asus TUF Gaming Z490-plus, 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Here's a result for the low end on your table. It's made me very glad that I've got a 5600x that I'm waiting to install!
Intel i5 3470 @3.2 GHz
8GB DDR3 RAM @ 1600
Multi Core Result = 1721
Single Core Result = 557
Intel Core i9 10900k (underclocked/undervolted as in laptop):
Single Core : 1211
Multi Core: 13871.
Just tried this on another PC also:
Intel i7 5820k @ 3.3 GHz
16GB DDR4 RAM @ 2666
Multi Core Result = 6164
Single Core Result = 735