Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 24

Thread: Quake 4 Performance: Athlon 64 & X850XT PE, GeForce 6/7 series

  1. #1
    HEXUS webmaster Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    14,283
    Thanks
    293
    Thanked
    841 times in 476 posts

    Quake 4 Performance: Athlon 64 & X850XT PE, GeForce 6/7 series

    Crazy Chris* Tom of AMDZone has been benchmarking the latest edition of the Quake series on various bits of juicy graphics hardware.
    Clearly with AA enabled the balance starts to tip towards SLI especially at higher resolutions as we would expect from the Doom 3 engine. We will continue to add additional graphic card configurations to our benchmarks as time allows as we will add Crossfire results, and other Radeon and GeForce numbers soon. From what we see so far if you want to deathmatch with Quake 4 at high resolution and image quality then you will be spending several hundred dollars on a high end video card if you have not already.
    [AMDZone]

    *Chris may not be crazy, but I am an apparent alliteration abuser.
    PHP Code:
    $s = new signature();
    $s->sarcasm()->intellect()->font('Courier New')->display(); 

  2. #2
    Senior Member Merlin4458's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Kingston Uni
    Posts
    2,606
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked
    11 times in 11 posts
    Sounds to me like the engine is poo. If im going to get 40 fps at 1280 with my setup then thats silly.
    Rig: Amd 64 3700+ San Diego | Abit AT8 | 4x512 Corsair XMS3200C2PRO | PowerColour X850XTPE / Arctic Cooled | Samsung Spinpoint 250Gig | Enermax NoiseTake 485w | Arctic Freezer 64 Pro | Coolermaster Wavemaster Silver | Dell 2405FPW | Logitech G5 / Everglide Destrukt Monstermat |

  3. #3
    Senior Member Blackmage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,934
    Thanks
    202
    Thanked
    65 times in 45 posts
    • Blackmage's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI P67-GD65
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core I7 2600k
      • Memory:
      • 8 Gb Hynix DDR3 1333
      • Storage:
      • Crucial m4 120Gb, 2TB Samsung F4
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI HD5830
      • PSU:
      • 700w Coolermaster Gold Plus
      • Case:
      • Xclio/Aplus Windtunnel
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic VX2239WM 22" LCD Monitor
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Broadband 10mbit
    ^^ agreed just like the fear engine, has a load of crap in it.

  4. #4
    Real Ultimate Power! Grey M@a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    4,625
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked
    156 times in 139 posts
    • Grey M@a's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 7
      • CPU:
      • i7 4790K (With H100i cooling)
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance Pro 16GB DDR3 (2 x 8GB)
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 Pro 128GB SSD, 1TB Cavier Black WD HD, 4TB Cavier Black WD HD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI R9 390X Gaming Edition 8GB
      • PSU:
      • SuperFlower Leadex GOLD 850W Fully Modular
      • Case:
      • Corsair 650D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" LG 24GM77-B 144Hz
      • Internet:
      • 100MB Virgin Media Cable
    Man oh man, I love these threads, first off people moan as graphics ain't good, then you get the good graphics and moan more due to it not pushing hundred's of frames a second. Hopefully this is will swing things back the way it should be, playability over graphics. Doom 3 is the perfect proof here, good graphics dog of a plot/story/playability bores the life out of you :/

  5. #5
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Merlin4458
    Sounds to me like the engine is poo. .
    Thought this used the doom3 engine?

  6. #6
    Real Ultimate Power! Grey M@a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    4,625
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked
    156 times in 139 posts
    • Grey M@a's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 7
      • CPU:
      • i7 4790K (With H100i cooling)
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance Pro 16GB DDR3 (2 x 8GB)
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 Pro 128GB SSD, 1TB Cavier Black WD HD, 4TB Cavier Black WD HD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI R9 390X Gaming Edition 8GB
      • PSU:
      • SuperFlower Leadex GOLD 850W Fully Modular
      • Case:
      • Corsair 650D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" LG 24GM77-B 144Hz
      • Internet:
      • 100MB Virgin Media Cable
    It does but a lot of people are complaining about it as it really hammers the old graphic cards. Thing is it runs fine on the 6800GT at home and I have worse systems than the one's mentioned above.

  7. #7
    Lovely chap dangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    8,398
    Thanks
    412
    Thanked
    459 times in 334 posts
    • dangel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • See My Sig
      • CPU:
      • See My Sig
      • Memory:
      • See My Sig
      • Storage:
      • See My Sig
      • Graphics card(s):
      • See My Sig
      • PSU:
      • See My Sig
      • Case:
      • See My Sig
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • See My Sig
      • Internet:
      • 60mbit Sky LLU
    OpenGL was/is usually better on nVidia cards. nVidia built a card for the doom3 engine effectively and so it's no suprise nVidia do well here. Half Life 2 mysteriously runs faster on ATI hardware shock/horror _i really wonder why_.
    D3 engine is very good but just hasn't been used in a good game (i've yet to play quake 4). Name another engine with all that loverly organic sticky stuff in it
    Crosshair VIII Hero (WIFI), 3900x, 32GB DDR4, Many SSDs, EVGA FTW3 3090, Ethoo 719


  8. #8
    Real Ultimate Power! Grey M@a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    4,625
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked
    156 times in 139 posts
    • Grey M@a's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 7
      • CPU:
      • i7 4790K (With H100i cooling)
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance Pro 16GB DDR3 (2 x 8GB)
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 Pro 128GB SSD, 1TB Cavier Black WD HD, 4TB Cavier Black WD HD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI R9 390X Gaming Edition 8GB
      • PSU:
      • SuperFlower Leadex GOLD 850W Fully Modular
      • Case:
      • Corsair 650D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" LG 24GM77-B 144Hz
      • Internet:
      • 100MB Virgin Media Cable
    Duke Nukem Forever is on the D3 engine so only time will tell how people use it. Soldier of Fortune 3 is on the D3 engine apparently.

  9. #9
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Grey M@a
    Duke Nukem Forever is on the D3 engine so only time will tell how people use it. Soldier of Fortune 3 is on the D3 engine apparently.

    oh dear

  10. #10
    Real Ultimate Power! Grey M@a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    4,625
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked
    156 times in 139 posts
    • Grey M@a's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z97X Gaming 7
      • CPU:
      • i7 4790K (With H100i cooling)
      • Memory:
      • Corsair Vengeance Pro 16GB DDR3 (2 x 8GB)
      • Storage:
      • Samsung 840 Pro 128GB SSD, 1TB Cavier Black WD HD, 4TB Cavier Black WD HD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI R9 390X Gaming Edition 8GB
      • PSU:
      • SuperFlower Leadex GOLD 850W Fully Modular
      • Case:
      • Corsair 650D
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" LG 24GM77-B 144Hz
      • Internet:
      • 100MB Virgin Media Cable
    Oh Dear? what for? The Doom 3 engine is a good engine its just how the devs work with it. To be honest what Carmack and crew did with the D3 engine was good. The engine and graphics are two different things. Remember Soldier of fortune 2, was the Quake 3 engine with their own front end/models/textures bolted on

  11. #11
    Senior Member Blackmage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,934
    Thanks
    202
    Thanked
    65 times in 45 posts
    • Blackmage's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI P67-GD65
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core I7 2600k
      • Memory:
      • 8 Gb Hynix DDR3 1333
      • Storage:
      • Crucial m4 120Gb, 2TB Samsung F4
      • Graphics card(s):
      • ATI HD5830
      • PSU:
      • 700w Coolermaster Gold Plus
      • Case:
      • Xclio/Aplus Windtunnel
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional
      • Monitor(s):
      • Viewsonic VX2239WM 22" LCD Monitor
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Broadband 10mbit
    The Doom 3 engine is good, for doom3 but in quake4 it looks like they have messed with the coding? and it doesn't look that much better then Doom3

  12. #12
    Eccentric Trend setter
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Torquay, Devon, UK
    Posts
    512
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Source > D3 Purely for not being a system hog

  13. #13
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Kordir
    Source > D3 Purely for not being a system hog

    Couldn't have put it better myself!!

  14. #14
    Lovely chap dangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    8,398
    Thanks
    412
    Thanked
    459 times in 334 posts
    • dangel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • See My Sig
      • CPU:
      • See My Sig
      • Memory:
      • See My Sig
      • Storage:
      • See My Sig
      • Graphics card(s):
      • See My Sig
      • PSU:
      • See My Sig
      • Case:
      • See My Sig
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • See My Sig
      • Internet:
      • 60mbit Sky LLU
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Kordir
    Source > D3 Purely for not being a system hog

    er... no. HL2 sucks up plenty of memory thank-you-very-much (and, runs much smoother on 2gig as opposed to 1 because of it).
    Crosshair VIII Hero (WIFI), 3900x, 32GB DDR4, Many SSDs, EVGA FTW3 3090, Ethoo 719


  15. #15
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    Memory is alot cheaper than a Gfx card!

  16. #16
    Lovely chap dangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    8,398
    Thanks
    412
    Thanked
    459 times in 334 posts
    • dangel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • See My Sig
      • CPU:
      • See My Sig
      • Memory:
      • See My Sig
      • Storage:
      • See My Sig
      • Graphics card(s):
      • See My Sig
      • PSU:
      • See My Sig
      • Case:
      • See My Sig
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • See My Sig
      • Internet:
      • 60mbit Sky LLU
    Eh? I don't see your point - both games use up lots of memory, and both games require lots of graphic power to see them at their best.
    Crosshair VIII Hero (WIFI), 3900x, 32GB DDR4, Many SSDs, EVGA FTW3 3090, Ethoo 719


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Enabling 2D Enhancements on GeForce 6 and 7 Series
    By Tobeman in forum Graphics Cards
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 25-07-2005, 09:58 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19-08-2004, 04:42 PM
  3. Do you get an 'XP rating' applied when you o/c?
    By Austin in forum PC Hardware and Components
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 11-12-2003, 03:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •