Can I get a 'woot'?[L'Inq]THE AMD FX-60 is due out in the second week of January.
Preliminary reports are that it will be a decent overclocker, early samples went to almost 3GHz on air, with little or no tweaking.
Can I get a 'woot'?[L'Inq]THE AMD FX-60 is due out in the second week of January.
Preliminary reports are that it will be a decent overclocker, early samples went to almost 3GHz on air, with little or no tweaking.
Woot!!!
Think I'll ask for cash this xmas!! ;o)
Will this be a single core chip?
I heard it was a dual core chip but i could be wrong.
Neo
Home Entertainment =Epson TW9400, Samsung 65" HDTV, Denon AVRX6300H, Panasonic DPUB450EBK Ultra HD Blu-Ray and Monitor Audio Silver RX 7.0, Monitor Audio CT265IDC(x4) Dolby Atmos and XTZ 12.17 Sub - (Config 7.1.4)
My System=Gigabyte X470 Aorus Gaming 7 Wi-Fi, AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, Patriot 16 GB DDR4 3200MHz, 256GB Crucial SSD, Kingston 256GB SSD and 500GB Samsung F3, Palit GTX1070 GameRock Edition , Enermax Liberty 620W, Akasa Eclipse-32,Dell 2715H & Dell U2311H
Home Server 2/HTPC - Ryzen 5 3600, Asus Strix B450, 16GB Ram, Gigabyte 1660 Super, Corsair TX550, Kodi with MadVR & Nvidia Shield Pro (4K)
Diskstation/HTPC - Synology DS2415+ with 47TB
Portable=Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Huawei M5 10" & HP Omen 15 laptop
Hmm, this is on my shopping list, but like many I'm wondering if it'll be dual core or not. The switch to a 6x naming series (as opposed to naming it the FX-59; the logical successor) suggests that it could be more than just a tweaked piece of silicon. This story over at The Inquirer suggests it is indeed a dual core part, but they talk of 2.8 GHz clock speeds, rather than the 3 GHz I'd heard elsewhere.
3ghz dual core is not going to happen, certanly not for while.
I reckon it will be 2.6ghz multi unlocked, 1mb each, dual core.Unimpressive to say the least.
Okay, I think this image should settle any doubts![]()
Smokey21: this image suggests base clock of 2.8 GHz. Remember that the FX-55 was 2.6GHz. Given that AMD had already acknowledged that dual core wasn't the ultimate for gaming (the FX was) it'd have to substantially add on what the FX-55 gives if it was to remain at the same clock. It'd be pointless introducing a CPU with a lower clock than the FX-57 which only adds dual-core (it'd end up being slower for single-threaded games - I'm not sure I'd pay the requisite arm and a leg for that).
2.8 GHz dual core seems like the safe bet here, but the suggestions that it may be easily overclocked are encouraging.
It's reported that they can reach 3GHz, not sayin' they are going to be 3GHz. Plus, nVIDIA and ATi will probably release drivers that will use both cores to their advantage in games, so it's pretty cool AMD are making a DC FX chip.
I don't know how this can be unimpressive for 939 people! - This could be the best thing for them!
I've made my friend turn from intel to AMD, and he plans on one of these babies to save him!
BEER to AMD!
it will have to be dual core otherwise the opterons spank its azz and call it charlie
Well 2.8ghz, Dual core, is going to cost an arm a leg and a kidney, seeing as one 2.8ghz X-57 is well over 600quid, and the 2.4ghz 4800+ is the same.Originally Posted by kapowaz
Like i said, i reckon 2.6ghz.![]()
Me, too! Now I just need to find 100 friends to give me £10 each...Originally Posted by GFiSH
![]()
You're guestimating it'll be around £1000!? :|
Well, if it's less, I'm sure I'll be able to find something to spend the excess on.Originally Posted by xpronic
![]()
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT
cant wait till get my hands on one!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)