More slightly surprising news about the Wii. Mind you, does it really make that much difference?
Check out the Headline for more info.
More slightly surprising news about the Wii. Mind you, does it really make that much difference?
Check out the Headline for more info.
HEXUS.net - undisputedly the UK's largest, best trusted and most influential PC technology enthusiasts resource
HEXUS.trust - the original, the best, the most trusted independent customer & retailer ratings
HEXUS.community - discussions, help, opinions & news
HEXUS.gaming - Own The Competition!
HEXUS.lifestyle - Digital Home buying advice, help, news & entertainment
DVdoctor.community - discussions, help, opinions & news for video editors
Booooooo - this is a no-no surely! I was kinda looking forward to getting some digital surround sound support (Dolby Digital) from Nintendo this time round. Pro Logic II is fine as far as it goes - but thats its problem, it doesn't go far enough.
<still looking forward to my Wii though>
What we share with everyone is glum, and dark...
I've never compared the two - what are the differences between them?
HEXUS.net - undisputedly the UK's largest, best trusted and most influential PC technology enthusiasts resource
HEXUS.trust - the original, the best, the most trusted independent customer & retailer ratings
HEXUS.community - discussions, help, opinions & news
HEXUS.gaming - Own The Competition!
HEXUS.lifestyle - Digital Home buying advice, help, news & entertainment
DVdoctor.community - discussions, help, opinions & news for video editors
makes sense, they are after all targetting it at kiddies, what sort of 12 year old has a optical surround sound system?
But it's not being targetted at kids.
Seems a little half arsed by the mighty 'N' this - if they have pro logic II then it would present an almost negligable cost to up this to dolby digital. Most dev houses are more than happy to work with it, it isnt a new spangly tech anymore but the DD experience is ultimately superior. Are DD setups all that rare now-a-days?
What we share with everyone is glum, and dark...
negligable? there's the extra connectors (money), the silicon to manage encoding (money), and the licensing fees (money) - plus major changes to the development kits (money).Originally Posted by noTHINGface
every tiny detail on a games console magnifies when you're building millions of them, and it's important to minimise costs wherever possible, if you don't want to make a loss.
An optical output aint that expensive per unit part and they're licensing PLII already, silicon I have no experience so wont comment but I wouldn't expect that to be savagely more expensive. Dev kits would be fitted with the above (if they had gone down the DD route).
Agreed costs are magnified and the h/w has to be a cost efficient as possible to hit the agreed price point - consoles tend to be sold at loss.
Either way - even the xbox which made its debut five years ago (its really been that long?!) has DD.
What we share with everyone is glum, and dark...
remember SoundStorm? much as a small number of people used it, from nvidia's perspective, it was expensive to include & used by too few people - and therefore dropped.Originally Posted by noTHINGface
tend to be. nintendo have never played that game - which is why they made the largest profits in the last console generationAgreed costs are magnified and the h/w has to be a cost efficient as possible to hit the agreed price point - consoles tend to be sold at loss.
at significant cost - and the xbox was sold at a massive lossEither way - even the xbox which made its debut five years ago (its really been that long?!) has DD.
All true but the Wii isn't targetted at the home cinema technophile...
It's targetted, as hex says, at everyone. How many people have a dolby digital decoder? Not as many as you'd think.
Those that have it will have gone out and pondered long and hard over decoder boxes and will know all about oygen free copper cables and all that malarkey. The Wii, while being a console they can certainly use, isn't aimed specifically at them.
The Wii is aimed at the lowest common denominator, ie. the casual gamer who doesn't have an HDTV or a dedicated sound decoder and 7 speakers. This person will probably get these things in the future but they're NOT an early adopter, buying the latest tech because it's there...
In all honetsly DTS is a nice thing but it won't make THAT much difference to the experience - though it is a nice thing for sure. I agree with hex - this will help Nintendo once again sell consoles at a profit which should also mean lower costs being handed onto the people who want a big splash of Wii
True, but you're talking about a different demographic group from the one Wii is aimed at. You have the kit and know how to set it up and aren't daunted by technology, so 'most of us' is correct... the thing is, the 'most of us' you're talking about ISN'T a significant proportion of the potential gaming market.Originally Posted by bertie
But you're not being left out, you can go buy a Wii if you want, it's just going to be a tad more simplistic than us dedicated gamers might want.
However, having said that, as far as I'm concerened, if it is a simple solution that gives me fun games to play, I don't really care if it doesn't have dolby digital ubberyfrippery or doesn't have ultra-realistic photo quality graphics with real-time shadowing, specular effects and seventy four layers of pixel shading... That's what my PC is for...
Indeed - I'll be using the PC for surround sound intensive "highend graphics and effects" gaming, and using the Wii for looking like a right tool diving round the front room pretending to be a ninja after a few jars of sauceOriginally Posted by Nick
Oh yeah, I shown that "uber video" to a Sony fanboy last night and he was speechless - the only thing's that came out of his mouth were "uhhhh....","how much","when", and "I want it...." as well as a bit of drool
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)