Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 18

Thread: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    NVIDIA claims that Intel's Core i7 will bring SLI to life. We take a closer look at multi-GPU performance.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Hicks12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Plymouth-SouthWest
    Posts
    6,586
    Thanks
    1,070
    Thanked
    340 times in 293 posts
    • Hicks12's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z68-V
      • CPU:
      • Intel i5 2500k@4ghz, cooled by EK Supreme HF
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Kingston hyperX ddr3 PC3-12800 1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • 64GB M4/128GB M4 / WD 640GB AAKS / 1TB Samsung F3
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Palit GTX460 @ 900Mhz Core
      • PSU:
      • 675W ThermalTake ThoughPower XT
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-A70 with modded top for 360mm rad
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 Professional 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2311H IPS
      • Internet:
      • 10mb/s cable from virgin media

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    Couldnt it be down to the motherboard?Nvidia SLI may be utilised better on the core 7 motherboard which could affect results like this, i dont know if im right or wrong but still . I think amd will have something to say when their card would cost less(2x£350) compared to to £1000 on nvidia card's, look forward to seeing how well ati cards compete.
    Quote Originally Posted by snootyjim View Post
    Trust me, go into any local club and shout "I've got dual Nehalem Xeons" and all of the girls will practically collapse on the spot at the thought of your e-penis

  3. #3
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    Was about to say exactly the same thing as Hicks.

    But either way, it's good to know that the core i7 + X58 combination looks like it's a good one for those people wanting triple SLI with top end cards.

  4. #4
    Chillie in here j.o.s.h.1408's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    a place called home
    Posts
    8,545
    Thanks
    757
    Thanked
    256 times in 193 posts
    • j.o.s.h.1408's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P6T Delux
      • CPU:
      • Intel core i7 920 @ 3ghz
      • Memory:
      • 3GB DDR RAM
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung F1, 500GB Seagate baracuda + 320gb Seagate PATA +150GB WD PATA
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 480GTX SC edition
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic M12 600W Module PSU FTW
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-A7010B (the rolls royce of pc cases)
      • Operating System:
      • vista ultimate edition and windows xp
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22inch 2005FPW dell monitor
      • Internet:
      • 24mb BE There Broadband

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    too much money for tri sli and a i7

  5. #5
    Chillie in here j.o.s.h.1408's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    a place called home
    Posts
    8,545
    Thanks
    757
    Thanked
    256 times in 193 posts
    • j.o.s.h.1408's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P6T Delux
      • CPU:
      • Intel core i7 920 @ 3ghz
      • Memory:
      • 3GB DDR RAM
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung F1, 500GB Seagate baracuda + 320gb Seagate PATA +150GB WD PATA
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 480GTX SC edition
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic M12 600W Module PSU FTW
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-A7010B (the rolls royce of pc cases)
      • Operating System:
      • vista ultimate edition and windows xp
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22inch 2005FPW dell monitor
      • Internet:
      • 24mb BE There Broadband

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jenny_Y8S View Post
    What am I missing? How many FPS can a TFT actually show? 60hz? 120hz?

    Why would you ever care if your game tried to output at a higher frame than your monitor could display? At best it would be wasted electricity and therefore more heat, and at worst it would make the game judder (effecitively down sampling through frame binning)

    If you capped the framerate at the frequency of your monitor, the CPU / RAM would be able to be focussed on game macanics and user interraction without having to pump so much wasted data to the GPU.

    In modern games & game engines. Is the FPS linked to processing server commands, user input etc? If so that's just so very old skool.

    So never spend effort getting a framerate higher than the hz of your TFT is that a good technique?

    Any games able to cap the framerate?

    Or am I a doofus?
    all this try SLI stuff is so that people can play crysis at full settings with 60fps (still cant do that even with 3 way sli with 280gtx)

  6. #6
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jenny_Y8S View Post
    Any games able to cap the framerate?

    Or am I a doofus?
    It's called V-sync (in a way).

    Triple 280 is overkill for small monitors, but if you're running a gazillion pixels, across multiple monitors, use full AA and AF, and play something like crysis or future games, you might just need it.

  7. #7
    NOT Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,905
    Thanks
    412
    Thanked
    278 times in 253 posts

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jenny_Y8S View Post
    So never spend effort getting a framerate higher than the hz of your TFT is that a good technique?

    Any games able to cap the framerate?

    Or am I a doofus?
    I wouldn't think it to be a good technique as what happens when the next game comes out, the card that is built to just stay above or near my refresh rate of my monitor wouldn't do so well would it. Do I want to buy a newer card for every new game that comes out? The more powerful setup would drop some frames but might still stay above the refresh rate so it still performs well for longer.


    You can cap the framerate it's called V-Sync, but if your card isn't up to it, it will make your movements with the mouse like jelly.

    No you aren't you're just asking some interesting questions

    Agent can tell us about the FPS thingy I forgot all about it again too

  8. #8
    Senior Member this_is_gav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,854
    Thanks
    175
    Thanked
    255 times in 217 posts

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    Regarding V-Sync, the limitation (apart from perhaps compatibility issues in some combinations) is that if the theoretical frame-rate drops beneath 60FPS, even to 59FPS, then you'll see 30FPS.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    176
    Thanks
    173
    Thanked
    18 times in 8 posts

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    There's an article on a certain hardware site from tom that has a good cross section of benchmarked platforms and shows exactly where the 3-way SLi/i7 comes into its own. Worth a look at the benches.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • Jamsta's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Shoddyboard
      • CPU:
      • P4 2.4 HT blx
      • Memory:
      • 1.5gb PC2700 DDR
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 250gb Sextor
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon 9600xt
      • PSU:
      • 400watt 1999 PSU
      • Case:
      • Dell Crapola
      • Operating System:
      • XP 32bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x 15" TFTs
      • Internet:
      • 20mb Virgin Cable

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    Shame no Crysis Warhead benchs for the i7, that would test it seriously.

  11. #11
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamsta View Post
    Shame no Crysis Warhead benchs for the i7, that would test it seriously.
    More than Crysis?

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • Jamsta's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Shoddyboard
      • CPU:
      • P4 2.4 HT blx
      • Memory:
      • 1.5gb PC2700 DDR
      • Storage:
      • 2 x 250gb Sextor
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon 9600xt
      • PSU:
      • 400watt 1999 PSU
      • Case:
      • Dell Crapola
      • Operating System:
      • XP 32bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x 15" TFTs
      • Internet:
      • 20mb Virgin Cable

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    Quote Originally Posted by kalniel View Post
    More than Crysis?
    Same as Crysis, but the didn't test that either, unless I'm blind and missed the benches?

  13. #13
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    11,193
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked
    1,091 times in 833 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD 2700X (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Patriot Viper 2 @ 3466MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB WD Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    which other x58 boards have SLI?

    V-Sync inst necessarily capping the frame rate as such, its more to do with prevention of the horizontal image tearing. When the processed framerate is above the limit of the monitor this happens... or at least thats how i understand it. Its all very complicated and can involve multiple levels of buffering each frame.

    Capping the frame rate in a more traditional sense is often done with a command that runs in the users config file ie for COD4 it would be /com_maxFPS 60.

    Dont forget to tell me about other x58 SLI boards btw
    Last edited by Biscuit; 18-11-2008 at 04:39 AM.

  14. #14
    Chillie in here j.o.s.h.1408's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    a place called home
    Posts
    8,545
    Thanks
    757
    Thanked
    256 times in 193 posts
    • j.o.s.h.1408's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASUS P6T Delux
      • CPU:
      • Intel core i7 920 @ 3ghz
      • Memory:
      • 3GB DDR RAM
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung F1, 500GB Seagate baracuda + 320gb Seagate PATA +150GB WD PATA
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVGA 480GTX SC edition
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic M12 600W Module PSU FTW
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-A7010B (the rolls royce of pc cases)
      • Operating System:
      • vista ultimate edition and windows xp
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22inch 2005FPW dell monitor
      • Internet:
      • 24mb BE There Broadband

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    dont they all have sli and crossfire?

  15. #15
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    Quote Originally Posted by j.o.s.h.1408 View Post
    dont they all have sli and crossfire?
    They all have crossfire. They all have the capability to provide SLI, but it's licensed, so they have to pay nVidia who will then allow them to use it on that board, so most boards have it, but it's possible in theory to get one that doesn't allow it.

  16. Received thanks from:

    j.o.s.h.1408 (18-11-2008)

  17. #16
    Oh Crumbs.... Biscuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    N. Yorkshire
    Posts
    11,193
    Thanks
    1,394
    Thanked
    1,091 times in 833 posts
    • Biscuit's system
      • Motherboard:
      • MSI B450M Mortar
      • CPU:
      • AMD 2700X (Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3)
      • Memory:
      • 16GB Patriot Viper 2 @ 3466MHz
      • Storage:
      • 500GB WD Black
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic Focus Gold 750W
      • Case:
      • Lian Li PC-V359
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Internet:
      • BT Infinity 80/20

    Re: Reviews - Intel Core i7 and NVIDIA SLI: the way it's meant to be played?

    Ok but so far, other than the Eclipse, which ones do we know that can provide us with SLI and Xfire?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •