Read more.But there's a twist.
Read more.But there's a twist.
Yep pretty fair review. I'm starting to wonder about Sapphire recently, it's like they've really slipped since XFX came on to AMD's side and forced prices down.
Not very impressed by this.
Screwdriver slot to overclock?
Btw, cooler is umimpressive
I agree, I remember Tarinder's last Toxic review was the same and the cooler was very "meh".
It looks like Sapphire is trying to get by on the name now without providing the quality they used to have. It's just not good enough and I'd recommend people look elsewhere. HIS IceQ is nice imo.
can we please get some previous gen numbers to use if anyone is planning to upgrade ?
Hexus have it right - they're waiting for the new cards so have to do something to try and keep places buying new SKUs.
But there's more, folks, because this card is outfitted with a new type of rear bracket that, Sapphire says, enables more hot air to be exhausted out of the back. The premise is simple: just add more space for the air to escape from. It makes sense as the cooler is otherwise fully enclosed inside the plastic cover.
about time too....
I;'ve just gone from a 275GTX to a 6950 and while it's great, the cooler is NOT extracting air from my case.. not like the 260/275/280/285 range did.
I think the current crop of "twin fan but internal airflow in the case " has been a mistake.
Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
The thing is, what you can exhaust from those gaps is pathetic compared to what a few decently setup case fans will do.
I'd rather have my case, mobo and cpu running a couple of degrees warmer, then the gfx card 5-10c hotter.....when it's already by far the hottest PC component. I see the externally venting cards as great for SFF build but are otherwise just a way to make the gfx card run hotter then it needs to.
Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive
Unless I'm misreading the page badly, the bang-for-buck graph is wrong. You've substituted the bang-for-watt score of 0.78 in place of the bang-for-buck score of 0.58. The correct score puts the Toxic down near the bottom of the pack, a shade *under* the GTX570...
Tarinder (24-08-2011)
Erm.... no?
There's a microswitch to load up a second BIOS, otherwise overclocking is done via AMD Overdrive or another third party software of your choice. The big fill-port looking thing is ... designer fapping, maybe? I'm sure we saw it on another Sapphire card recently but I can't remember what it was for...
thats a nice card, i might just buy one if i see one 4 my new rig
looks okay, may upgrade if prices are not too expensive
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)