Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 TOXIC 2GB review

  1. #1
    HEXUS.admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    31,709
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2,073 times in 719 posts

    Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 TOXIC 2GB review

    But there's a twist.
    Read more.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    780
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked
    49 times in 38 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 TOXIC 2GB review

    Yep pretty fair review. I'm starting to wonder about Sapphire recently, it's like they've really slipped since XFX came on to AMD's side and forced prices down.

    Not very impressed by this.

  3. #3
    OilSheikh
    Guest

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 TOXIC 2GB review

    Screwdriver slot to overclock?

    Btw, cooler is umimpressive

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    780
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked
    49 times in 38 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 TOXIC 2GB review

    I agree, I remember Tarinder's last Toxic review was the same and the cooler was very "meh".

    It looks like Sapphire is trying to get by on the name now without providing the quality they used to have. It's just not good enough and I'd recommend people look elsewhere. HIS IceQ is nice imo.

  5. #5
    IQ: 1.42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    old trafford
    Posts
    1,340
    Thanks
    132
    Thanked
    94 times in 80 posts
    • Tunnah's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus somethingorother
      • CPU:
      • 3700X
      • Memory:
      • 16GB 3600
      • Storage:
      • Various SSDs, 90TB RAID6 HDDs
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 1080Ti
      • PSU:
      • Silverstone 650w
      • Case:
      • Lian-Li PC70B
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • 40mbit Sky Fibre

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 TOXIC 2GB review

    can we please get some previous gen numbers to use if anyone is planning to upgrade ?

  6. #6
    S1L3NT danroyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    sussex
    Posts
    4,243
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked
    186 times in 153 posts
    • danroyle's system
      • Motherboard:
      • N/A
      • CPU:
      • Intel Core I7 4720HQ
      • Memory:
      • 8GB
      • Storage:
      • 128GB SSD +1tb HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Geforce Gtx960m
      • PSU:
      • N/A
      • Case:
      • N/A
      • Operating System:
      • WINDOWS 10 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15.6" IPS
      • Internet:
      • BT Fibre

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 TOXIC 2GB review

    £15 less than the cheapest 6970 also. I'd pay the £15 for guaranteed extra cores and less hoop jumping


  7. #7
    Banhammer in peace PeterB kalniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    31,025
    Thanks
    1,871
    Thanked
    3,383 times in 2,720 posts
    • kalniel's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Ultra
      • CPU:
      • Intel i9 9900k
      • Memory:
      • 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1TB Samsung 970Evo+ NVMe
      • Graphics card(s):
      • nVidia GTX 1060 6GB
      • PSU:
      • Seasonic 600W
      • Case:
      • Cooler Master HAF 912
      • Operating System:
      • Win 10 Pro x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell S2721DGF
      • Internet:
      • rubbish

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 TOXIC 2GB review

    Hexus have it right - they're waiting for the new cards so have to do something to try and keep places buying new SKUs.

  8. #8
    HEXUS.timelord. Zak33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    I'm a Jessie
    Posts
    35,176
    Thanks
    3,121
    Thanked
    3,173 times in 1,922 posts
    • Zak33's system
      • Storage:
      • Kingston HyperX SSD, Hitachi 1Tb
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Nvidia 1050
      • PSU:
      • Coolermaster 800w
      • Case:
      • Silverstone Fortress FT01
      • Operating System:
      • Win10
      • Internet:
      • Zen FTC uber speedy

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 TOXIC 2GB review

    But there's more, folks, because this card is outfitted with a new type of rear bracket that, Sapphire says, enables more hot air to be exhausted out of the back. The premise is simple: just add more space for the air to escape from. It makes sense as the cooler is otherwise fully enclosed inside the plastic cover.

    about time too....

    I;'ve just gone from a 275GTX to a 6950 and while it's great, the cooler is NOT extracting air from my case.. not like the 260/275/280/285 range did.

    I think the current crop of "twin fan but internal airflow in the case " has been a mistake.

    Quote Originally Posted by Advice Trinity by Knoxville
    "The second you aren't paying attention to the tool you're using, it will take your fingers from you. It does not know sympathy." |
    "If you don't gaffer it, it will gaffer you" | "Belt and braces"

  9. #9
    Anthropomorphic Personification shaithis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Last Aerie
    Posts
    10,857
    Thanks
    645
    Thanked
    872 times in 736 posts
    • shaithis's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8Z77 WS
      • CPU:
      • i7 3770k @ 4.5GHz
      • Memory:
      • 32GB HyperX 1866
      • Storage:
      • Lots!
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Sapphire Fury X
      • PSU:
      • Corsair HX850
      • Case:
      • Corsair 600T (White)
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10 x64
      • Monitor(s):
      • 2 x Dell 3007
      • Internet:
      • Zen 80Mb Fibre

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 TOXIC 2GB review

    Quote Originally Posted by Zak33 View Post
    I;'ve just gone from a 275GTX to a 6950 and while it's great, the cooler is NOT extracting air from my case.. not like the 260/275/280/285 range did.

    I think the current crop of "twin fan but internal airflow in the case " has been a mistake.
    The thing is, what you can exhaust from those gaps is pathetic compared to what a few decently setup case fans will do.

    I'd rather have my case, mobo and cpu running a couple of degrees warmer, then the gfx card 5-10c hotter.....when it's already by far the hottest PC component. I see the externally venting cards as great for SFF build but are otherwise just a way to make the gfx card run hotter then it needs to.
    Main PC: Asus Rampage IV Extreme / 3960X@4.5GHz / Antec H1200 Pro / 32GB DDR3-1866 Quad Channel / Sapphire Fury X / Areca 1680 / 850W EVGA SuperNOVA Gold 2 / Corsair 600T / 2x Dell 3007 / 4 x 250GB SSD + 2 x 80GB SSD / 4 x 1TB HDD (RAID 10) / Windows 10 Pro, Yosemite & Ubuntu
    HTPC: AsRock Z77 Pro 4 / 3770K@4.2GHz / 24GB / GTX 1080 / SST-LC20 / Antec TP-550 / Hisense 65k5510 4K TV / HTC Vive / 2 x 240GB SSD + 12TB HDD Space / Race Seat / Logitech G29 / Win 10 Pro
    HTPC2: Asus AM1I-A / 5150 / 4GB / Corsair Force 3 240GB / Silverstone SST-ML05B + ST30SF / Samsung UE60H6200 TV / Windows 10 Pro
    Spare/Loaner: Gigabyte EX58-UD5 / i950 / 12GB / HD7870 / Corsair 300R / Silverpower 700W modular
    NAS 1: HP N40L / 12GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Arrays || NAS 2: Dell PowerEdge T110 II / 24GB ECC RAM / 2 x 3TB Hybrid arrays || Network:Buffalo WZR-1166DHP w/DD-WRT + HP ProCurve 1800-24G
    Laptop: Dell Precision 5510 Printer: HP CP1515n || Phone: Huawei P30 || Other: Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Pro 10.1 CM14 / Playstation 4 + G29 + 2TB Hybrid drive

  10. #10
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,231
    Thanked
    2,291 times in 1,874 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 TOXIC 2GB review

    Unless I'm misreading the page badly, the bang-for-buck graph is wrong. You've substituted the bang-for-watt score of 0.78 in place of the bang-for-buck score of 0.58. The correct score puts the Toxic down near the bottom of the pack, a shade *under* the GTX570...

  11. Received thanks from:

    Tarinder (24-08-2011)

  12. #11
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,231
    Thanked
    2,291 times in 1,874 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 TOXIC 2GB review

    Quote Originally Posted by OilSheikh View Post
    Screwdriver slot to overclock?
    Erm.... no?

    There's a microswitch to load up a second BIOS, otherwise overclocking is done via AMD Overdrive or another third party software of your choice. The big fill-port looking thing is ... designer fapping, maybe? I'm sure we saw it on another Sapphire card recently but I can't remember what it was for...

  13. #12
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    25
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    1 time in 1 post

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 TOXIC 2GB review

    thats a nice card, i might just buy one if i see one 4 my new rig

  14. #13
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts

    Re: Reviews - Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 TOXIC 2GB review

    looks okay, may upgrade if prices are not too expensive

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-06-2011, 11:36 AM
  2. Replies: 46
    Last Post: 06-03-2011, 02:55 AM
  3. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 16-03-2010, 10:35 PM
  4. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-04-2009, 12:26 PM
  5. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 04-08-2008, 04:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •