Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 25 of 25

Thread: Reviews - AMD A10-5700

  1. #17
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,231
    Thanked
    2,291 times in 1,874 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-5700

    Quote Originally Posted by imadman View Post
    What the F is the point of using an APU with a discrete GPU?!? (besides the hybrid crossfire stuff ofcourse)
    Because APUs are pretty much AMDs only presence in the CPU market sub-£100, and it is relevant to show the effect of the CPU in your subsystem on gaming performance - i.e. if you want to get the most out of your gaming rig you really need to spend more than £100 on your CPU. Just because most people won't put a dGPU in an AMD APU based system doesn't mean testing that combination is worthless.

  2. #18
    Headless Chicken Terbinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    7,670
    Thanks
    1,210
    Thanked
    727 times in 595 posts
    • Terbinator's system
      • Motherboard:
      • ASRock H61M
      • CPU:
      • Intel Xeon 1230-V3
      • Memory:
      • Geil Evo Corsa 2133/8GB
      • Storage:
      • M4 128GB, 2TB WD Red
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte GTX Titan
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX760i
      • Case:
      • Coolermaster 130
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 8.1 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell Ultrasharp U2711H
      • Internet:
      • Virgin Media 60Mb.

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-5700

    Can you imagine if these had the FX cache as well Absolutely sew the low end up.
    Kalniel: "Nice review Tarinder - would it be possible to get a picture of the case when the components are installed (with the side off obviously)?"
    CAT-THE-FIFTH: "The Antec 300 is a case which has an understated and clean appearance which many people like. Not everyone is into e-peen looking computers which look like a cross between the imagination of a hyperactive 10 year old and a Frog."
    TKPeters: "Off to AVForum better Deal - £20+Vat for Free Shipping @ Scan"
    for all intents it seems to be the same card minus some gays name on it and a shielded cover ? with OEM added to it - GoNz0.

  3. #19
    Not a good person scaryjim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Gateshead
    Posts
    15,196
    Thanks
    1,231
    Thanked
    2,291 times in 1,874 posts
    • scaryjim's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Dell Inspiron
      • CPU:
      • Core i5 8250U
      • Memory:
      • 2x 4GB DDR4 2666
      • Storage:
      • 128GB M.2 SSD + 1TB HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Radeon R5 230
      • PSU:
      • Battery/Dell brick
      • Case:
      • Dell Inspiron 5570
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • 15" 1080p laptop panel

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-5700

    Problem with that is L3 cache == more silicon area == higher cost dies == no longer low end chip! Perhaps on 28nm we'll get enough space for a shared CPU/GPU cache as well?

  4. #20
    bored out of my tiny mind malfunction's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Lurking
    Posts
    3,923
    Thanks
    191
    Thanked
    187 times in 163 posts
    • malfunction's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte G1.Sniper (with daft heatsinks and annoying Killer NIC)
      • CPU:
      • Xeon X5670 (6 core LGA 1366) @ 4.4GHz
      • Memory:
      • 48GB DDR3 1600 (6 * 8GB)
      • Storage:
      • 1TB 840 Evo + 1TB 850 Evo
      • Graphics card(s):
      • 290X
      • PSU:
      • Antec True Power New 750W
      • Case:
      • Cooltek W2
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 10
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2715H

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-5700

    Quote Originally Posted by Agent View Post
    Anyone seen any undervolting / underclocking on these chips yet?
    The only thing I can find is on Tom's (and the idiots don't even state what the default voltage of the chip is, presume 1.4V):

    http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/a10-58...w-32536-2.html

    The FM1s seem to undervolt quite nicely though:

    http://www.silenthardware.de/2011/07...s-ist-moglich/
    http://www.hardware.fr/focus/48/amd-...ervolting.html

    (taken from here: http://forums.hexus.net/cpus/222321-...therboard.html)

    And I'm sure I read a review or two that shows similar gains for piledriver / vishera, though I can only find this one at the mo:

    http://www.hardcoreware.net/amd-pile...shera-8350/11/

  5. Received thanks from:

    Agent (27-10-2012)

  6. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Halley's Comet
    Posts
    197
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    3 times in 3 posts
    • Dottorrent's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus P8H61m-LE Rev3
      • CPU:
      • Intel pentium dual core G620 @2.6GHz
      • Memory:
      • 2x2GB Kingston hyperX @1333MHz
      • Storage:
      • Seagate Barracuda SATA I 160GB
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Gigabyte Radeon HD 7770
      • PSU:
      • OCZ CoreXStream 500W
      • Case:
      • Antec Three Hundred Two
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 ultimate 64Bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 22" LG Flatron monitor
      • Internet:
      • Virgin media

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-5700

    This CPU (or APU) is the best value of the A-series. It provides the high power of the FX-4170 while at the same time providing highly powered DirectX 11.1 graphics and at only £90, it's the same price of the equivalent Sandy Bridge Core i3-2120 processor. Unfortunately, it uses the completely different FM2 architecture. Would of been nice if the architecture was the same like what Intel did for Ivy bridge by keeping the architecture of Sandy bridge.

  7. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    162
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked
    12 times in 10 posts
    • MustardCutter's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Sabretooth
      • CPU:
      • i5 3570K @ 4.4GHz
      • Memory:
      • Samsung 30nm DDR3 @ 1866
      • Storage:
      • 64Gb + 256Gb Crucial M4 SSDs, 1.5Tb Seagate HDD
      • Graphics card(s):
      • MSI 560 Ti @ 915MHz, 4.4GHz RAM
      • PSU:
      • Corsair Gold 850AX
      • Case:
      • Antec 900
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 7 64-bit

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-5700

    "snips in-use power-draw by one-third - to 65W from 100W"

    Sorry but this is a bit misleading as the 65W and 100W values are TDP (thermal design power), it is not the same thing as power draw. It's more about how much heat the chip produces which you notice by your system being quieter with the 65W chip, i.e. less fan speed required to remove heat.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dottorrent View Post
    This CPU (or APU) is the best value of the A-series. It provides the high power of the FX-4170 while at the same time providing highly powered DirectX 11.1 graphics and at only £90, it's the same price of the equivalent Sandy Bridge Core i3-2120 processor. Unfortunately, it uses the completely different FM2 architecture. Would of been nice if the architecture was the same like what Intel did for Ivy bridge by keeping the architecture of Sandy bridge.
    I wouldn't call the FX-4170 'high power', nor say these APUs provide 'highly powered graphics', I would call it good enough and good value (I will be buying one when itx boards are available). The statement about intel and sockets is interesting as Intel are usually the bad guys in that respect, like when sandy bridge came out there was no real need for a new socket for it.
    Last edited by MustardCutter; 29-10-2012 at 11:55 AM.

  8. #23
    GazP172
    Guest

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-5700

    Not read the review fully but would have been nice to see some temperatures.

  9. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    780
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked
    49 times in 38 posts

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-5700

    AMD's temperature sensors are completely whacked on their recent chips - they show about 20C lower than they actually are. This has been the case since Thuban and possibly before then, and it's nigh on impossible to get an accurate reading of temperature.

  10. #25
    GazP172
    Guest

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-5700

    Some details on the heatsink and fan would be usefull too, mainly dimensions (after a bit of research apparently its the exact same cooler thats supplied with the Lano). I feel AMD should have supplied it with a low profile quiet cooler as the customer who will go for this over the A10 5800k will be more than likely either a) fitting to a HTPC or b)fitting to a mini/sff PC.

    Going off on one I feel AMD should aim their new APU's at 2 areas in the market

    1 - 5800k/5600k for budget friendly capable tower/desktops - which they have done by great all round performance, great specs, basic cooler and ATX boards that seem to be available


    2 - 5700/5500 for HTPC/SFF - Needs a low profile fan and ITX boards (pref with built in wifi) for icing on the cake.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •