Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 17 to 22 of 22

Thread: Reviews - AMD A10-6800K (32nm Richland)

  1. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    375
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    13 times in 13 posts

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-6800K (32nm Richland)

    I look at these chips in hope that they are a significant upgrade to my 6! year old core 2 quad and the answer is no it performs about the same if not a bit slower!
    Which is a bit of a problem for amd as most people these days will be upgrading from an existing system rather than buying there first pc and will be looking for a significant jump. Not so long ago even budget chips were a jump from any 3+ year old chip. But anyone that has a true quad (pre dozer) this is likely to be a downgrade.

    Those that have existing dual core machines probably run a lot of single threaded apps (and there is a lot of those out there) and again this may end up being a downgrade as it's single thread performance is so laughable despite it's high clock speed.

  2. #18
    Moosing about! CAT-THE-FIFTH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    32,039
    Thanks
    3,910
    Thanked
    5,224 times in 4,015 posts
    • CAT-THE-FIFTH's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Less E-PEEN
      • CPU:
      • Massive E-PEEN
      • Memory:
      • RGB E-PEEN
      • Storage:
      • Not in any order
      • Graphics card(s):
      • EVEN BIGGER E-PEEN
      • PSU:
      • OVERSIZED
      • Case:
      • UNDERSIZED
      • Operating System:
      • DOS 6.22
      • Monitor(s):
      • NOT USUALLY ON....WHEN I POST
      • Internet:
      • FUNCTIONAL

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-6800K (32nm Richland)

    Is it possible Hexus can review the Athlon II X4 760K?? It looks quite a decent budget offering especially for the budget overclocker!!

    Quote Originally Posted by scaryjim View Post
    Don't suppose you've got a 6700 hiding in the back room have you hexus? Be nice to see that compared to the 5800k & i3 - should have very similar performance but be much more impresive on the power draw side of things...
    Hexus are going to review it as they mentioned this in the article!!

  3. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    1,675
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked
    124 times in 101 posts
    • Percy1983's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Gigabyte x570 Aorus Pro
      • CPU:
      • AMD 5900x + Cooler Master Nepton 140XL
      • Memory:
      • 64GB (4x16GB ) Corsair Vengence 3200mhz @ 3600mhz CL16
      • Storage:
      • 1tb SP US75 Boot + Fast 4tb SP XS70 + Slow Raid 0 4tb (2tbx2) with 100gb NVME cache
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Vega 56 8GB
      • PSU:
      • 875w Thermaltake Toughpower XT
      • Case:
      • Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
      • Operating System:
      • Windows 11 Pro 64bit
      • Monitor(s):
      • 24" Acer UHD x2
      • Internet:
      • Vodafone

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-6800K (32nm Richland)

    Quote Originally Posted by keithwalton View Post
    I look at these chips in hope that they are a significant upgrade to my 6! year old core 2 quad and the answer is no it performs about the same if not a bit slower!
    Which is a bit of a problem for amd as most people these days will be upgrading from an existing system rather than buying there first pc and will be looking for a significant jump. Not so long ago even budget chips were a jump from any 3+ year old chip. But anyone that has a true quad (pre dozer) this is likely to be a downgrade.

    Those that have existing dual core machines probably run a lot of single threaded apps (and there is a lot of those out there) and again this may end up being a downgrade as it's single thread performance is so laughable despite it's high clock speed.
    I think you are missing the point of the APUs, if you want to beat your old core2 quad then get an 8350 for not too much more.

    Anyway the point is get an intel cpu + graphics card which performs as well and then look at the price...

    These are great chips, ideal for budget builds and htpcs, they are not made to take the all out performance crown.

  4. #20
    Registered+
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    83
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked
    6 times in 5 posts
    • YEHBABY's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Asus Maximus V Gene
      • CPU:
      • i7 2700k @ 4.7ghz
      • Memory:
      • 8GB Corsair LP 1600mhz
      • Storage:
      • 256GB Samsung,2x2TB F4
      • Graphics card(s):
      • Asus GTX580 DirectCUii
      • PSU:
      • Corsair AX850W
      • Case:
      • Antec P182
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 64 Pro
      • Monitor(s):
      • Dell U2412m

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-6800K (32nm Richland)

    This is ideal for a HTPC and it allows a little gaming as well.
    i7 2700K @ 4.7Ghz / Asus Gene V / 8GB Corsair Vengeance LP / Asus GTX580 DirectCUII / Samsung 830 256GB /
    2x2TB Samsung F4EG / Corsair AX850W / Antec P182 / Silver Arrow Cooler / Dell U2412M

  5. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    KSQ PA
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    0 times in 0 posts
    • Weberrp's system
      • Motherboard:
      • Zotac A55 mini-itx
      • CPU:
      • AMD A10-6800k
      • Memory:
      • 8GB (2 x 4GB) G.skill 1866 DDR3
      • Storage:
      • Seagate SSHD 500GB 2.5" Sata III
      • PSU:
      • 250watt Apex
      • Case:
      • Apex MI
      • Operating System:
      • Win 7 Pro 64
      • Monitor(s):
      • Samsung 40" 120hzLED

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-6800K (32nm Richland)

    Can I squeeze one of these into a Shuttle SN95 chassis on a Zotac A55 mini-itx mobo?

  6. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked
    2 times in 1 post

    Re: Reviews - AMD A10-6800K (32nm Richland)

    Why use a NVidia card, e all knowwill be better with the intel cpu's, why not a radeon card, to xfire the apu's , then I think we wll see more performance, all I can say is intel bias

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •